Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Influence of OMF Application Rates on Post Field Soil Fertility Status under Pawpaw (Carica papaya L.) Varieties

Authors: O. O. Olubode, I. O. O. Aiyelaagbe, J. G. Bodunde

Abstract:

Field study was conducted to determine the post field soil fertility status responses of pawpaw (Carica papaya L.) var. homestead selection and sunrise-solo orchards to organo-mineral fertilizer (OMF) rates applied at 10, 20 40 t/ha where both the zero t/ha OMF and NPK 15:15:15 at 50 g/plant/month served as control. The result showed that all pawpaw orchards treated with OMF rates recorded significantly (p≤0.01) higher % P, % K, Na and % organic matter in soil compared to applied NPK which recorded lower Na. However, while orchards plated with sole pawpaw were higher in soil bulk density (SBD), orchards with homestead mixture were lower in SBD and significantly lower % organic matter compared to obtainable under sunrise crop mixture which recorded lower Na and Mg. In conclusion, as a result of loosening effect on soil particles, the homestead pawpaw probably due to more rooting activities as well as the addition of organic fertilizer to soils both had significant influence leading to lower SBD. 

Keywords: Carica papaya (L), growth and yield, organo-mineral fertilizer, soil fertility status.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1087712

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1654

References:


[1] Lampkin N. H. (1990) Organic Farming. Farming Press Books, Wharfedale Rd., Ipswich IPI 4CG, U.K.
[2] Altieri, M. A. (1987) Agro-ecology- The scientific basis of Alternate Agriculture. Westview press. (Boulders).
[3] Olubode, O. O. and Fawusi, M. O. A (1998) Effect of organic manure on growth and yield of pawpaw (Carica papaya L) Nig. J. Hort. Soc. vol. 3. pp. 80-87.
[4] Aruleba, J. O. and Fasina, A. S. (2004) Soil degradation and vegetable production in South Western Nigeria. Proc.of the 22nd Annual conference of HORTSON, Kano. pp. 134 – 137.
[5] Darwish, O. H., Persaud, N., Martens, D. C. (1995) Effect of long-term application of animal manure on physical properties of three soils. Plant Soils 178, 289-295.
[6] Hati, K. M., K. G. Mandal, A. K. Mistra, P. K. Ghosh, and K. K. Bandyopadhyay (2006) Effect of inorganic fertilizer and farm yard manure on soil physical properties, root distribution, and water use efficiency of soybean in Vertisols of Central India, Bio-resource Technology 97: 2182-2188.
[7] Bhagat, R. M. and T. S. Verma (1991), Impact of rice straw management on soil physical properties and wheat yield. Soil Sci. 152, 108-115.
[8] Acharya, C. I. Bisnoi, S. K., Yaduvanshi, H. S. (1988) Effect of longterm application of fertilizer and organic and inorganic amendments under continuous cropping on physical and chemical properties in an Alfisol. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 58, 509-516.
[9] Khaleel, R., Reddy, K. R. Overcash, M. R. (1981) Changes in soil physical properties due to organic waste application a review. J. Environ. Quality 10, 133-141.
[10] Avnimelech, Y. (1986) Organic residues in modern agriculture In: Chen, Y. and Avnimelech, Y. (eds) The role of organic matter in modern agriculture. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrechi, The Netherlands.
[11] Lowell J. F. (1998) Producing Foods without pesticides. Local solutions to crop pest control in West Africa. Technical center for Agricultural and Rural Coperation. (ACP-EC). CTA, Postbus 380, 6700 AJ, Wagenigen, The Netherlands.
[12] Stastistical Analysis System (1990) SA/STAT Users’ Guide. Version 6 Fourth Edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
[13] Steel, R. G. D and Torrie, J. A. (1980) Principles and procedure of Statistics. New York: McGraw –Hill Book Co.
[14] Ikeorgu, J. E. (1984) Some micro environmental changes under cassava – maize intercrops grown with okra and egusi. Ph D Thesis, Univ. of Ibadan, Nigeria.
[15] Ossom, E. M. (2003) Effect of cucumber (Cucumber sativus L) management methods on weed infestation and soil temperature in Swaziland. Trop. Agric.(Trinidad) vol. 80 no 4 pp. 205-214.