Sweetpotato Organic Cultivation with Wood Vinegar, Entomopathogenic Nematode and Fermented Organic Substance from Plants

Authors: U. Pangnakorn, P. Tayamanont, R. Kurubunjerdjit

Abstract:

The effect of wood vinegar, entomopathogenic nematodes ((Steinernema thailandensis n. sp.) and fermented organic substances from four plants such as: Derris elliptica Roxb, Stemona tuberosa Lour, Tinospora crispa Mier and Azadirachta indica J. were tested on the five varieties of sweetpotato with potential for bioethanol production ie. Taiwan, China, PROC No.65-16, Phichit 166-5, and Phichit 129-6. The experimental plots were located at Faculty of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of the five treatments for growth, yield and insect infestation on the five varieties of sweetpotato. Treatment with entomopathogenic nematodes gave the highest average weight of sweetpotato tubers (1.3 kg/tuber), followed by wood vinegar, fermented organic substances and mixed treatment with yields of 0.88, 0.46 and 0.43 kg/tuber, respectively. Also the entomopathogenic nematode treatment gave significantly higher average width and length of sweet potato (9.82 cm and 9.45 cm, respectively). Additionally, the entomopathogenic nematode provided the best control of insect infestation on sweetpotato leaves and tubers. Comparison among the varieties of sweetpotato, PROC NO.65-16 showed the highest weight and length. However, Phichit 129-6 gave significantly higher weight of 0.94 kg/tuber. Lastly, the lowest sweet potato weevil infestation on leaves and tubers occurred on Taiwan and Phichit 129-6.

Keywords: Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas), sweetpotato weevil (Cylas formicarius Fabr), wood vinegar, Entomopathogenic nematode (Steinernema thailandensis n. sp.), fermented organic substances.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1087610

References:

[1] Nedunchezhiyan, M., Byju, G. and S.N. Dash. 2010. Effects of organic production of orange fleshed sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) on root yield, quality and soil biological health. International Research Journal of Plant Science (ISSN: 2141-5447) Vol. 1(6) pp. 136-143, December, 2010.
[2] Talekar NS. 1982. Effects of a sweetpotato weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infestation on sweetpotato root yields. Journal of Economic Entomology 75: 1042-1044.
[3] Ekanayake, H. M. R. K., Abeysinghe, A. M. C. P. and Yukio Toida 2001. Potential of Entomopathogenic Nematodes as Bio-Control Agents of Sweetpotato Weevil, Cylas formicarius (FABRICIUS) (Coleoptera : Brenthidae) Japanese Journal of Nematology Vol.31 No.1/2 December, 2001.
[4] Talekar NS. 1982. Effects of a sweetpotato weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infestation on sweetpotato root yields. Journal of Economic Entomology 75: 1042-1044.
[5] Sherman , M., and M. Tamashiro .1954. The sweetpotato weevils in Hawaii: their biology and control. Hawaii Agric Exp Stn Tech Bull 23:1–36.
[6] Talekar, N.S. 1988. How to control sweetpotato weevil: A practical IPM approach. International Cooperator's Guide AVRDC 88-292. Asian Vegetable research and Development Center (AVRDC), Tainan, Taiwan, 6 p.
[7] Katherine L. Adam 2005. Sweetpotato: Organic Production Horticulture Crops, National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT).
[8] Apai W., and S. Thongdeethae. 2001. Wood vinegar: new organic for Thai Agriculture. The 4 th Toxicity Division Conference, Department of Agriculture pp. 166-169.
[9] Pangnakorn U., Watanasorn S., Kuntha C., and Chuenchooklin S. 2010. Effects of Wood Vinegar and Fermented Liquid Organic Fertilizer on Soybean (Srisamrong 1) in the Drought Season Cultivation: Journal of ISSAAS (The International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences) Vol.16 (2):67-73.
[10] Nderitu, J., Sila, M., Nyamasyo, G., and M. Kasina. 2009. Effectiveness of Entomopathogenic Nematodes against Sweetpotato Weevil (Cylas puncticollis Boheman (Coleoptera: Apionidae)] Under Semi-Field Conditions in Kenya. Journal of Entomology, 6: 145-154.
[11] Smart, G.C., 1995. Entomopathogenic nematodes for the biological control of insects. J. Nematol., 27: 529-534.
[12] McGraw, B.A. and A.M. Koppenhofer, 2008. Evaluation of two endemic and five commercial entomopathogenic nematode species (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae) against annual bluegrass weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) larvae and adults. Biol. Control, 46: 467-475.
[13] Tangchitsomkid, N. 1998. New entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema thailandensis n. sp. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) from Thailand. Thai Agricultural Research Journal (Sep-Dec 1998) v. 16(3) p. 185-193.
[14] Michael Hughes 2010. Reducing pest and disease impact on yield in selected Papua New Guinea sweet potato production systems. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).
[15] Kaya, H.K. and R. Gaugler. 1993. Entomopathogenic nematodes. Annual Review of Entomology 38, 181–206.
[16] Gaugler, R. and H.K. Kaya. 1990. Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Biological Control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
[17] Gaugler, R. 2002. Entomopathogenic Nematology. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
[18] Olgaly Ramos-Rodrı´gueza, James F. Campbellb, Sonny B. Ramaswamya. 2006. Pathogenicity of three species of entomopathogenic nematodes to some major stored-product insect pests. Journal of Stored Products Research 42 (2006) 241–252.
[19] Talekar, N. S.; Lai, R. M.; Cheng, K. W.1989. Integrated control of sweetpotato weevil at Penghu Island. Plant Protection Bulletin, Taiwan, 1989, 31, 2, pp 185-191.
[20] Talekar, N. S. 1987. Resistance in sweetpotato to sweetpotato weevil. Insect Science and its Application, 1987, 8, 4-6, pp 819-823.