Performance Evaluation of Purely Mechanical Wireless In-Mould Sensor for Injection Moulding
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33093
Performance Evaluation of Purely Mechanical Wireless In-Mould Sensor for Injection Moulding

Authors: Florian Müller, Christian Kukla, Thomas Lucyshyn, Clemens Holzer

Abstract:

In this paper, the influencing parameters of a novel purely mechanical wireless in-mould injection moulding sensor were investigated. The sensor is capable of detecting the melt front at predefined locations inside the mould. The sensor comprises a movable pin which acts as the sensor element generating structure-borne sound triggered by the passing melt front. Due to the sensor design, melt pressure is the driving force. For pressure level measurement during pin movement a pressure transducer located at the same position as the movable pin. By deriving a mathematical model for the mechanical movement, dominant process parameters could be investigated towards their impact on the melt front detection characteristic. It was found that the sensor is not affected by the investigated parameters enabling it for reliable melt front detection. In addition, it could be proved that the novel sensor is in comparable range to conventional melt front detection sensors.

Keywords: Injection Moulding, In-Mould Sensor, Structure-Borne Sound, Wireless Sensor

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1087564

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2069

References:


[1] K. K. Wang, J. Zhou, and Y. Sakurai, “An Integrated Adaptive Control for Injection Molding,” in Proceedings of ANTEC 1999, New York City, 1999.
[2] Z. Chen and L.-S. Turng, “A review of current developments in process and quality control for injection molding,” Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 165–182, 2005.
[3] J. Giboz, T. Copponnex, and P. M´el´e, “Microinjection molding of thermoplastic polymers: a review,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 96–109, 2007.
[4] D. O. Kazmer, S. P. Johnston, R. Gao, and Z. Fan, “Feasibility Analysis of an In-mold Multivariate Sensor,” International Polymer Processing The Journal of the Polymer Processing Society, vol. XXVI, no. 01, pp. 63–72, 2011.
[5] D. O. Kazmer, Plastics manufacturing systems engineering:
[a systems approach]. M¨unchen: Hanser Verlag, 2009.
[6] D. O. Kazmer, S. Velusamy, S. Westerdale, S. Johnston, and R. Gao, “A comparison of seven filling to packing switchover methods for injection molding,” Polymer Engineering and Science, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2031– 2043, 2010.
[7] C. Bader, “Das kleine Einmaleins der Werkzeug-Sensorik,” Kunststoffe International, no. 6, pp. 114–117, 2006.
[8] T. Hirano, “Automated Switchover in Injection Molding,” Journal of the Japan Society of Polymer Processing, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 843, 1997.
[9] M.-S. Huang, “Cavity pressure based grey prediction of the filling-topacking switchover point for injection molding,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 183, no. 2-3, pp. 419–424, 2007.
[10] B. Sheth, C. M. Barry, N. R. Scott, R. D. Higdon, and B. Davison, “Improved part quality using cavity pressure switchover,” in Proceedings of ANTEC 2001, Dallas, 2001.
[11] F. Johannaber and W. Michaeli, Handbuch Spritzgiessen, 2nd ed. M¨unchen: Hanser, 2004.
[12] C. Collins, “Monitoring cavity pressure perfects injection molding,” Assembly Automation, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 197–202, 1999.
[13] A. Kelly, M. Woodhead, and P. Coates, “Comparison of injection molding machine performance,” Polymer Engineering & Science, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 857–865, 2005.
[14] L. Zhang, C. B. Theurer, R. Gao, and D. O. Kazmer, “Design of ultrasonic transmitters with defined frequency characteristics for wireless pressure sensing in injection molding,” IEEE Transactions on Ultransonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1360–1371, 2005.
[15] L. Zhang, C. B. Theurer, R. Gao, and D. O. Kazmer, “DEVELOPMENT OF A WIRELESS PRESSURE SENSOR WITH REMOTE ACOUSTIC TRANSMISSION,” Transaction North American Manufacturing Research Institute, vol. 30, pp. 573–580, 2002.
[16] Z. Fan, R. Gao, and D. O. Kazmer, “Design of a self-energized wireless sensor for simultaneous pressure and temperature measurement,” Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent, Montreal, 2010.
[17] C. Theurer, Li Zhang, D. O. Kazmer, R. Gao, and R. Jackson, “Passive charge modulation for a wireless pressure sensor,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2006.
[18] L. Zhang, C. B. Theurer, and R. Gao, “A SLEF-ENERGIZED SENSOR FOR WIRELESS INJECTION MOLD CAVITY PRESSURE MEASUREMENT: DESIGN AND EVALUATION,” Journal of dynamic systems, measurement, and control, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 309–318, 2004.
[19] F. Muller, G. Rath, T. Lucyshyn, C. Kukla, M. Burgsteiner, and C. Holzer, “Presentation of a novel sensor based on acoustic emission in injection molding,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 4744–4749, 2013.
[20] F. M¨uller, P. O’Leary, G. Rath, M. Harker, T. Lucyshyn, and C. Holzer, “Resonant Acoustic Sensor System for the Wireless Monitoring of Injection Moulding,” in Sensornets 2013, 2nd International Conference on Sensor Networks, Barcelona, 2013.
[21] B. Heißing, Fahrwerkhandbuch. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 2008.
[22] I. N. Bronˇstejn, Taschenbuch der Mathematik, 19th ed. Thun and Frankfurt/Main: Deutsch, 1981.
[23] C. Bader and S. C. Zeller, “Die Entdeckung der Schmelzefront: Sensortechnik,” Kunststoff Magazin Online, no. 6, pp. 2–6, 2010.
[24] M. Pahl, W. Gleissle, and H.-M. Laun, Praktische Rheologie der Kunststoffe und Elastomere, 4th ed. D¨usseldorf: VDI-Verl., 1995.
[25] Priamus System Technologies AG, “Datasheet 4007B / 4008B,” Schaffenhausen and Switzerland, 2013.