Formation of Civic Identity in the Process of Globalization: The Example of the U.S.A. and Kazakhstan

Authors: Elnura Assyltayeva, Zhanar Aldubasheva, Zhengisbek Tolen

Abstract:

An attempt has been made several times to identify and discuss the U.S. experience on the formation of political nation in political science. The purpose of this research paper is to identify the main aspects of the formation of civic identity in the United States and Kazakhstan, through the identification of similarities and differences that can get practical application in making decisions of national policy issues in the context of globalization, as well as to answer the questions “What should unite the citizens of Kazakhstan to the nation?" and “What should be the dominant identity: civil or ethnic (national) one?" Can Kazakhstan being multiethnic country like America, adopt its experience in the formation of a civic nation? Since it is believed that the “multi-ethnic state of the population is a characteristic feature of most modern countries in the world," it states that “inter-ethnic integration is one of the most important aspects of the problem of forming a new social community (metaetnic - Kazakh people, Kazakh nation" [1].

Keywords: nation, civic identity, nation building, globalization, interethnic relations, patriotism

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1329971

References:

[1] Samsonov, L.V. (2005) 'K voprosu o formirovanii edinoi kazakhstanskoi nacii', Vestnik KASU: 4.
[2] Beisenova, G. (2009) Problemy globalizacii i identichnosti, Almaty: Print-s
[3] Shahanov, M. (2009) 'Gosudarstvennyi yiazyk', Egemen Kazakhstan, 15 November, 6(4): 83-112.
[4] Kenneth, L. and Karst, S. (1986) ÔÇÿPaths to Belonging: The Constitution and Cultural Identity-, North Carolina Law Review, pp. 301-303.
[5] Gadgiev, K.S. (1999) Amerikanskaiya naciya: nacionalnoe samosoznanie I kultura, Moskva
[6] Makeev, S. (1998) 'Processy socialnoi strukturizacii v sovremennoi Ukraine', Polis 3:50-51
[7] Kordonskii, S. (2000) Rynki vlasti: administrativnye rynki Rossii I SSSR, Moskva: ð×GI, 188-190
[8] Izdibaev, T. (2006) 'Statagenstvo podvelo predvaritelnye itogi perepisi naselenia I socialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitia', Panorama (15): 15 aprelya, 28.
[9] Nysanbaev, ðÉ.N. (1999) 'Problemy duhovno-nravstvennoi bezopanosti Kazakhstana', Sayasat, 6:28.
[10] Samsonov, L.V. (2005) 'K voprosu o formirovanii edinoi kazakhstanskoi nacii', Vestnik KASU: 4.
[11] Buluktaev, Y. (2001) Osobennosti identifikacionnyh processov v Respublike Kazakhstan, Almaty.
[12] Mustafaev, E. (2010) Nacia I nacionalnost, Almaty.
[13] Shadge, A.Y. (1996), Grazhdanskai identichnost, Moskva.
[14] Utalieva, Zh.T. (1994), Yiazyk kak factor formirovanii etnicheskoi identichnosti, Moskva.
[15] Pogorelyi, A.P. (2004) Patriotizm kak cennost rossiiskogo obshestva, Moskva, pp. 9-10.
[16] Selivanova, V.Y. (2003) 'Nacionalizm I patriotism: popytka pereosmaslenia poniatii', Vestnik MGU, 18 (1), pp. 91-93.
[17] Ashimbaev, M.S. (2004) Problemy I perspektivy grazhdanskoi identifikacii naselenia Kazakhstana, Almaty: KISI, pp. 20 - 21.