A Comparison of Experimental Data with Monte Carlo Calculations for Optimisation of the Sourceto- Detector Distance in Determining the Efficiency of a LaBr3:Ce (5%) Detector
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32794
A Comparison of Experimental Data with Monte Carlo Calculations for Optimisation of the Sourceto- Detector Distance in Determining the Efficiency of a LaBr3:Ce (5%) Detector

Authors: H. Aldousari, T. Buchacher, N. M. Spyrou

Abstract:

Cerium-doped lanthanum bromide LaBr3:Ce(5%) crystals are considered to be one of the most advanced scintillator materials used in PET scanning, combining a high light yield, fast decay time and excellent energy resolution. Apart from the correct choice of scintillator, it is also important to optimise the detector geometry, not least in terms of source-to-detector distance in order to obtain reliable measurements and efficiency. In this study a commercially available 25 mm x 25 mm BrilLanCeTM 380 LaBr3: Ce (5%) detector was characterised in terms of its efficiency at varying source-to-detector distances. Gamma-ray spectra of 22Na, 60Co, and 137Cs were separately acquired at distances of 5, 10, 15, and 20cm. As a result of the change in solid angle subtended by the detector, the geometric efficiency reduced in efficiency with increasing distance. High efficiencies at low distances can cause pulse pile-up when subsequent photons are detected before previously detected events have decayed. To reduce this systematic error the source-to-detector distance should be balanced between efficiency and pulse pile-up suppression as otherwise pile-up corrections would need to be necessary at short distances. In addition to the experimental measurements Monte Carlo simulations have been carried out for the same setup, allowing a comparison of results. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach have been highlighted.

Keywords: BrilLanCeTM380 LaBr3:Ce(5%), Coincidence summing, GATE simulation, Geometric efficiency

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1087366

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1846

References:


[1] A. Iltis, M.R. Mayhugh and P.Menge, Lanthanum halide scintillators: proprieties and applications. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics. Res .A 563, 359-363, (2006).
[2] BrilLanCe 380 Product Data Sheet - Saint- Gobainhttp://www.detectors.saintgobain.com/uploadedFiles/SGdetectors /Documents/Product_Data_Sheets/BrilLanCe380-data-sheet.pdf accessed 25/06/13
[3] S.R.Cherry, J.A.Sorenson, and M.E.Pheleps. Physics in nuclear medicine. 4th edition, USA: Saunders, (2012).
[4] G.F. Knoll, Radiation detection and measurement. 3rd edition, Wiley & Sons, (2000).
[5]
[Online] http://uvs-model.com/UVS%20on%20push-in%20gravity.htm.
[6] S Jan et al.,GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. Physics in Medicine and Biology.Res.
[7] G. Anil Kumar and I.Mazumdar, Experimental measurements and GENT4 simulations for a comparative study of efficiencies of laBr3: Ce, NaI(TI), and BaF2. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics. Res .A 610, 522-529, (2009).A 49, 4543–4561, (2004).
[8] P.N.Johnston, MHult, and JGasparro. Cascade summing effects in close geometry gamma-ray spectrometry.Appl Radiat Isot. 2006 Oct- Nov;64(10-11):1323-8.