Expanding Affordable Housing through Inclusionary Zoning in the City of Toronto

Authors: Sam Moshaver

Abstract:

Reasonably priced and well-constructed housing must be an integral and element supporting a healthy society. The absence of housing everyone in society can afford negatively affects the people's health, education, ability to get jobs, develop their community. Without access to decent housing, economic development, integration of immigrants and inclusiveness, the society is negatively impacted. Canada has a sterling record in creating housing compared to many other nations around the globe. Canadian housing gets support from a mature and responsive mortgage network and a top-quality construction industry as well as safe and excellent quality building materials that are readily available. Yet 1.7 million Canadian households occupy substandard abodes. During the past hundred years, Canada's government has made a wide variety of attempts to provide decent residential facilities every Canadian can afford. Despite these laudable efforts, today Canada is left with housing that is inadequate for many Canadians. People who own their housing are given all kinds of privileges and perks, while people with relatively low incomes who rent their apartments or houses are discriminated against. To help solve these problems, zoning that is based on an "inclusionary" philosophy is tool developed to help provide people the affordable residences that they need. No, thirty years after its introduction, this type of zoning has been shown effective in helping build and provide Canadians with a houses or apartments they can afford to pay for. Using this form of zoning can have different results +depending on where and how it is used. After examining Canadian affordable housing and four American cases where this type of zoning was enforced in the USA, this makes various recommendations for expanding Canadians' access to housing they can afford.

Keywords: Affordable Housing, Inclusionary Zoning Low- Income Housing, Toronto Housing.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1055591

References:

[1] A. Jackson, "Home truths: why the housing system matters to all Canadians" CHRA and CCPA, 2004, page3.
[2] T. Carter, "Current practices for procuring affordable housing: The Canadian Context" Housing policy debate, volume 8, Issue 3, 2009, pp. 593-631.
[3] J.D. Hulchanski, "Rethinking Canada-s affordable housing challenge, a discussion paper prepared for the government of Canada-s CanadianHousing framework initiative", University of Toronto, pp. 10- 14
[4] A. Jackson, "Home truths: why the housing system matters to all Canadians" CHRA and CCPA, 2004, page1.
[5] Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation, "Canadian Housing Observer 2009". Ottawa, CHMC, 2009.
[6] J.D. Hulchanski, "Rethinking Canada-s affordable housing challenge, a discussion paper prepared for the government of Canada-s CandianHouing framework initiative", University of Toronto, pp. 10-14
[7] T. Carter, "Current practices for procuring affordable housing: The Canadian Context" Housing policy debate, volume 8 ,Issue 3, 2009, pp. 250-254.
[8] A. Rose, "Canadian Housing policies 195-1980" Toronto, Butterworths, 1980.
[9] T. Carter, "Current practices for procuring affordable housing: The Canadian Context" Housing policy debate, volume 8, Issue 3, 2009, pp. 593-631.
[10] N. Bradford, "why cities matter: policy research perspectives for Canada". Ottawa, Canadian policy research networks, 2002,
[11] City of Toronto. 2006b. Perspectives on Housing Tenure. from:www.toronto.ca/planning/pdf/housing_tenure.pdf. Reviewed Jan 18, 2013.
[12] Toronto Community Foundation. 2008. Toronto Vital Signs, From: www.tcf.ca/Portals/0/docs/Toronto%27sVitalSigns2008.V6A.TCFWeb %284%29.pdf. Reviewed Jan 19, 2013.
[13] J. Hackworth. 2008. The Durability of Roll-Out Neoliberalism under Centre-Left Governance: The Case of Ontario-s Social Housing Sector, Studies in Political EconomyVol. 81: 7-26.
[14] City of Toronto. 2007b. Consolidated Section 37 Implementation Guidelines and Protocol for Negotiating Section 37 Community Benefits. From, www.toronto.ca/planning/pdf/s37_consolidation_080117.pdf. Retrieved Jan 8, 2013.
[15] Devine, P. 2008. Section 37: An Update on "Let-s Make a Deal Planning." Fraser, Milner, Casgrain LLP. Retrieved Jan 24, 2013 from www.fmclaw. com/upload/en/publications/2008/RealEstate_Mar2008_Devine_Sli wa_Section37.pdf.
[16] A.F. Schwartz. Housing policy in the Untied States. New York, NY: Routledge, 2010, pp.123-128.
[17] G.J. Knaap, H. Haccou, K.J. Clifton. Incentives, Regulations and plans. Maryland, Annapolis, 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. pp. 52-58.
[18] K.D. Brown. "Expanding affordable housing through inclusionary zoning: lesson from the Washington Metropolitan Area" The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. New York, 2001,
[19] G.J. Knaap, H. Haccou, K.J. Clifton. Incentives, Regulations and plans. Maryland, Annapolis, 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. pp. 52-58.
[20] A.F. Schwartz. Housing policy in the Untied States. New York, NY: Routledge, 2010, pp.123-128.
[21] T. Carter, "Current practices for procuring affordable housing: The Canadian Context" Housing policy debate, volume 8, Issue 3, 2009, pp. 585-587.
[22] S. Levine, L.Goldberg, N.Brunick, Large cities and inclusionary zoning, Washington D.C, 2003.
[23] M.Rosen, W.Sulivan, "From urban renewal and displacement to economic inclusion: San Francisco affordable housing policy 1978- 2012, poverty and race research action council" San Francisco , 2013
[24] J.Schuetz, R.Meltzer, V.Been, The effects of Inclusionary Zoning on Local Housing Market: Lessons for the San Francisco, Washington and Boston areas. Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New York University, 2007.
[25] Research Highlights, issue 46. Municipal Regulatory Initiatives: Providing for Affordable Housing. CMHC
[26] D.Rusk, Nine lessons for Inclusionary Zoning", keynote remarks of David Rusk on the National Inclusionary housing conference, Washington, DC, 2005.
[27] D.Rusk, He who pays the piper. Innovative housing Institute, 2008.
[28] J.Schuetz, R.Meltzer, V.Been, The effects of Inclusionary Zoning on Local Housing Market: Lessons for the San Francisco, Washington and Boston areas. Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New York University, 2007.
[29] Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Barristers & Solicitors, Ontario Expropriations Association Annual Caselaw Update October 25-26, 2012.
[30] J. Gladki, S.Pomeroy, Implementing the inclusionary policy to facilitate affordable housing in. Ontario, Ontarionon-profit housing association, Toronto, 2007.
[31] San Diego Housing Commission, Retrieved Jan 11, 2009 from, http://www.sdhc.net/Real-Estate/Developers/Inclusionary-Housing- Requirements/.
[32] Policy link, Increasing housing opportunity in New York City, Pratt institute for community and environmental development, New York, 2004.
[33] G.J. Knaap, H. Haccou, K.J. Clifton. Incentives, Regulations and plans. Maryland, Annapolis, 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. pp. 52-58.
[34] S. Levine, L.Goldberg, N.Brunick, Large cities and inclusionary zoning, Washington D.C, 2003.
[35] CMHC,Average market rents and affordable housing. Reviewed Jan, 09, 2013 from http://www.toronto.ca/housing/ social_housing/ otherdocs/avmarketrent_ahp.pdf
[36] G.J. Knaap, H. Haccou, K.J. Clifton. Incentives, Regulations and plans. Maryland, Annapolis, 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. pp. 52-58.