The Self-Energy of an Ellectron Bound in a Coulomb Field

Authors: J. Zamastil, V. Patkos

Abstract:

Recent progress in calculation of the one-loop selfenergy of the electron bound in the Coulomb field is summarized. The relativistic multipole expansion is introduced. This expansion is based on a single assumption: except for the part of the time component of the electron four-momentum corresponding to the electron rest mass, the exchange of four-momentum between the virtual electron and photon can be treated perturbatively. For non Sstates and normalized difference n3
En −
E1 of the S-states this itself yields very accurate results after taking the method to the third order. For the ground state the perturbation treatment of the electron virtual states with very high three-momentum is to be avoided. For these states one can always rearrange the pertinent expression in such a way that free-particle approximation is allowed. Combination of the relativistic multipole expansion and free-particle approximation yields very accurate result after taking the method to the ninth order. These results are in very good agreement with the previous results obtained by the partial wave expansion and definitely exclude the possibility that the uncertainity in determination of the proton radius comes from the uncertainity in the calculation of the one-loop selfenergy.

Keywords: Hydrogen-like atoms, self-energy.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1335616

References:

[1] P. J. Mohr et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 633 (2008); P. J. Mohr in Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, edited by G. W. F. Drake (Springer 2006). See also S. G. Karshenboim, Phys. Rep. 422, 1 (2005); M. I. Eides et al, Phys. Rep. 342, 63 (2001).
[2] E. Borie, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032508 (2005). See also K. Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2092 (1996); ibid 60, 3593 (1999).
[3] M. Niering et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5496 (2000); T. Udem et al, ibid 79, 2646 (1997). See also S. Bourzeix et al, ibid 76, 384 (1996).
[4] R. Pohl et al, Nature 466, 213 (2010).
[5] A. Antognini et al, J. Phys.: Conf. Series 312, 032002 (2011).
[6] The influence of the non-zero proton radius on the energy levels is given by the formula (1) where N is the principal quantum number of the state under consideration. The fundamental constants are denoted in the usual way and their values can be found in (1). The proton radius rp = 0.8768fm given in (1)leads to the the shift 1.052 MHz between 2S and 1S states, while the radius rp = 0.84184fm found in (4) leads to the shift 0.96977 MHz.
[7] R. Karplus et al, Phys. Rev. 86, 288 (1952); G. W. Erickson and D. R. Yennie, Ann. Phys. (NY) 35, 271 (1965); ibid 35, 447 (1965). See also M. Baranger et al, Phys. Rev. 92, 482 (1953); A. J. Layzer, J. Math. Phys. 2, 292 (1961); ibid 2, 308 (1961).
[8] K. Pachucki, Ann. Phys. (NY) 226, 1 (1993). See also W. Erickson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 780 (1971); J. Sapirstein, ibid 47, 1723 (1981).
[9] S. G. Karshenboim, Z. Phys. D 39, 109 (1997).
[10] U. D. Jentschura et al. Phys. Rev. A 72, 062102 (2005). See also A. Czarnecki et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 180404 (2005); U. D. Jentschura et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 163001 (2003); E.-O. Le Bigot et al. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042101 (2003); U. D. Jentschura and K. Pachucki, ibid 54, 1853 (1996); U. D. Jentschura et al. ibid 56, 1739 (1997). B. J. Wundt and U. D. Jentschura, Phys. Lett. B 659, 571 (2008).
[11] U. D. Jentschura et al, Phys. Rev. A 63, 042512 (2001). See also U. D. Jentschura et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 53 (1999).
[12] P. J. Mohr et al., Phys. Rep. 293, 227 (1998). See also P.J. Mohr, Phys. Rev. A 46, 4421 (1992); P. J. Mohr and Y. K. Kim, ibid 45, 2727 (1992); P. J. Mohr, ibid 26, 2338 (1982); P. J. Mohr, Ann. Phys. (NY) 88, 26, (1974); ibid 88, 52 (1974).
[13] K. Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 52, 1079 (1995). See also G. Bhatt and H. Grotch, Ann. Phys. (NY) 178, 1 (1987).
[14] The following notation is used: d4kF stands for i(2π)−2d4k and k stands for the four-momentum of the virtual photon. We use the summation convention A.B = AB = A0B0 − ~A.~B. In particular, k2 = k2 0 − ω2, ω2 = ~k.~k. The Dirac γ matrices are defined by the anticommutation relation {γμ, γ} = 2gμ, where g0μ = δ0μ and gij = −δij . Here δ has the usual meaning of the Kronecker symbol. When integrating over k0 in Eq. (5) we replace the electron mass m by m−iη and take the limit η → 0 from above. This is the same notation and the same way of integration as the one used by Feynman in his original papers in Phys. Rev. 76, 749 (1949); ibid 76, 769 (1949). The natural units (¯h = c = 1) are used throughout the paper. Symbol α stands for the fine structure constant. In actual calculation we took the value 1/137.03599911 given in (1).
[15] J. Zamastil, Ann. Phys. (NY) 327, 297 (2012).
[16] J. Zamastil and V. Patk´oˇs, Phys. Rev. A 86, 042514 (2012).
[17] J. Zamastil, Ann. Phys. (NY) 328, 139 (2013).
[18] J. Zamastil and V. Patk´oˇs, to be published.