Difference in Psychological Well-Being Based On Comparison of Religions: A Case Study in Pekan District, Pahang, Malaysia

Authors: Amran Hassan, Fatimah Yusooff, Khadijah Alavi

Abstract:

The psychological well-being of a family is a subjective matter for evaluation, all the more when it involves the element of religions, whether Islam, Christianity, Buddhism or Hinduism. Each of these religions emphasises similar values and morals on family psychological well-being. This comparative study is specifically to determine the role of religion on family psychological well-being in Pekan district, Pahang, Malaysia. The study adopts a quantitative and qualitative mixed method design and considers a total of 412 samples of parents and children for the quantitative study, and 21 samples for the qualitative study. The quantitative study uses simple random sampling, whereas the qualitative sampling is purposive. The instrument for quantitative study is Ryff’s Psychological Well-being Scale and the qualitative study involves the construction of a guidelines protocol for in-depth interviews of respondents. The quantitative study uses the SPSS version .19 with One Way Anova, and the qualitative analysis is manual based on transcripts with specific codes and themes. The results show nonsignificance, that is, no significant difference among religions in all family psychological well-being constructs in the comparison of Islam, Christianity, Buddhism and Hinduism, thereby accepting a null hypothesis and rejecting an alternative hypothesis. The qualitative study supports the quantitative study, that is, all 21 respondents explain that no difference exists in psychological wellbeing in the comparison of teachings in all the religious mentioned. These implications may be used as guidelines for government and non-government bodies in considering religion as an important element in family psychological well-being in the long run. 

Keywords: Psychological well-being, comparison of religions, family, Malaysia.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1086919

References:

[1] Asmawati Desa, Asmah Ahmad, and ZainiSharkawi (2009). Kesejahteraan Psikologikal Orang Asli di Pertakdan Gerachi Jaya. (Psychological Well-being for Orang Asli in Pertak and Gerachi Jaya) Journal Psikologi Malaysia. 23: 19-25.
[2] Noradilah Md Nordinand Mansor Abu Talib (2009). Kesunyiandan Kesejahteraan Psikologi di Kalangan Pelajar Universiti di Malaysia. (Loneliness and Psychological Well-being towards student in Malaysian University) Journal Psikologi Malaysia. 23: 27-37.
[3] Haron Din. (2010). Manusiadan Islam: Jilid Dua (Humanity and Islam). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa&Pustaka.
[4] ZulkifliMohamad al-Bakri (2010). Sistem Kekeluargaan Dalam Islam. (Family System in Islam). Bangi: Darul Syakir Enterprise.
[5] Yahaya Mahamood (2002). Kesihatandan Pencapaian Kesejahteraan Manusia: Perdampingan Sumber-sumber Biologikaldengan Faktorfaktor Psikologikaldan Sosial. (Healthy and Well-being for Human; Achievement; Contiguity of biological resources withpsychology and social factors). Pasca Sidang Seminar Psikologi – Psima 2000 and 2002. 2:1-16.
[6] Amran Hassan, Fatimah Yusooff and Khadijah Alavi. (2012). Keluarga Sihat Melahirkan Komuniti Sejahtera. (A Healthy Family Generates Prosperous Community: An Overview). Geografia Malaysia Journal of Society and Space. 8 (5): 51-63.
[7] Dollahite, D.C., and Thatcher, J.Y. (2005). How Family Religious Involvement Benefits Adults, Youth, and Children and Strengthens Families. Benefits of Religious Involvement. New York: W.m. S. Hein & Co.
[8] Amran Hassan, Fatimah Yusooff, and Khadijah Alavi (2011). Pendefinisiandan Faktor-faktor Kefungsian Keluarga. (Definition and Family Functioning Factors). Presentation Paper in Seminar Kaunseling Kebangsaan Pelbagai Budaya Perkama 2011, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS).
[9] Blanton, P.G. (2005). Christian Spirituality and Mental Health. Journal of Psychologyand Christianity. 24(1): 68-79.
[10] Firth, S. (2005). End of Life: A Hindu View. (www.thelancet.com) Vol 366 August20, 2005.
[11] McLoughlin, S. (2007). World Religion: An Ilustrate Guide. London: Star Fire.
[12] Cresswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research; Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
[13] Pejabat Tanah dan Daerah Pekan. (2012). Maklumat Daerah Pekan, Pahang Darul Makmur. (Information about Pekan District, Pahang). (www.pekan98.tripod.com/peta/main.htm.) (Accessed 26 Januari 2012).
[14] PJK Kg Beruas. (2012). Info Daerah Pekan. (Information of Pekan District).
[15] (www.kgberuas.pjk.com.my/index.php?option=com_content&task=vie w&id=18&Itemid=89) (Accessed 1 November 2012).
[16] Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations On The Meaning of Psychological Well - being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.57 (6): 1069-1081.
[17] Taylor-Power, E., & Renner, M. (2003). Analyzing Qualitative Data.
[18] (www.sedl./org/pembs/fam95/279.html) (Accessed; 22 Oct 2011).
[19] Wollny, I., Apps, J., and Henricson, C. (2010). Can Government Measure Family Wellbeing? A Literatuture Review.London: Family & Parenting Institute.
[20] Khodabaksh Ahmadi, Esfandiar Azad-Marzabadi, and Sayed Mahdi Nabipoor Ashrafi (2008). The Influence of Religosity in Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Social Sciences. 4(2): 103-110.
[21] Rashid, M.A. (2004). Religosity and Psychological Well-being in a Malaysian Context. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry. 12 (2): 24-37.
[22] Haris Abd. Wahab, Faizah Yunus, and Ahmad Nadzri (2002). Nilai Perkahwinan Dalam Masyarakat Di Malaysia. Jurnal Kebajikan Masyarakat. 24(2): 27-47.