An Approach to Construct Criteria for Evaluating Alternatives in Decision-Making

Authors: Niina M. Nissinen

Abstract:

This paper introduces an approach to construct a set of criteria for evaluating alternative options. Content analysis was used to collet criterion elements. Then the elements were classified and organized yielding to hierarchic structure. The reliability of the constructed criteria was evaluated in an experiment. Finally the criteria were used to evaluate alternative options indecision-making.

Keywords: Conceptual analysis, Content Analysis, Criteria, Decision-Making, Evaluation of Candidates

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1086551

References:

[1] J. L. Bermúdez, Decision Theory and Rationality, Oxford UniversityPress Inc., New York, 2009.
[2] S. Bond, K. A. Carlson, and R. L. Keeney, “Generating Onjectives:Can Decision Makers Articulate What They Want”, Management ScienceVol. 54, No. 1, January 2008, pp. 56-70.
[3] P. Busch, P. S. De Maret, T. Flynn, R. Kellum, S. Le, B. Meyers,M. Saunders, R. White, and M. Palmqvist. Content Analysis.Writing@CSU. Colorado State University, 1994 - 2012. Available athttp://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=61. (AccessedFebruary 10, 2013).
[4] R. Dhar and I. Simonson, “The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice”,Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 40, No. 2 (May 2003), pp. 146-160.
[5] E. H. Forman and M. A. Selly, Decisions by Objectives – How to Convince Others That You Are Right, World Scientific Publishing Co.Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 2001.
[6] R. K. Guenther, Human cognition, Hamline University. Prentice Hall College Div; 1 edition, 1997.
[7] K. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to itsMethodology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
[8] W. Lowe, “Content Analysis Software: A Review”, Technical Report for the Identity Project, Weatherhead. Center for InternationalAffairs, Harvard University, 2003.
[9] G. A. Miller, “The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information”. PsychologicalReview, 63, pp. 81–97.
[10] R. P. Weber, Basic Content Analysis. Sage university Paper Serieson Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 49.Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.