Effective Collaboration in Product Development via a Common Sharable Ontology

Authors: Sihem Mostefai, Abdelaziz Bouras, Mohamed Batouche

Abstract:

To achieve competitive advantage nowadays, most of the industrial companies are considering that success is sustained to great product development. That is to manage the product throughout its entire lifetime ranging from design, manufacture, operation and destruction. Achieving this goal requires a tight collaboration between partners from a wide variety of domains, resulting in various product data types and formats, as well as different software tools. So far, the lack of a meaningful unified representation for product data semantics has slowed down efficient product development. This paper proposes an ontology based approach to enable such semantic interoperability. Generic and extendible product ontology is described, gathering main concepts pertaining to the mechanical field and the relations that hold among them. The ontology is not exhaustive; nevertheless, it shows that such a unified representation is possible and easily exploitable. This is illustrated thru a case study with an example product and some semantic requests to which the ontology responds quite easily. The study proves the efficiency of ontologies as a support to product data exchange and information sharing, especially in product development environments where collaboration is not just a choice but a mandatory prerequisite.

Keywords: Information exchange, product lifecyclemanagement, product ontology, semantic interoperability.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1085675

References:

[1] D. Bourke, "The PLM Software Scene: Tips for Smart Shopping", 2PLM e-zine, vol.. 6, no. 12, 2004.
[2] J. Portella, "Collaborative management of the product definition lifecycle for the 21st Century", in CD-ROM Proc. PDT Europe Conference, Noordwijk, 2000.
[3] P. Ackerman, and D. Eichelberg, "Product Knowledge Management", in Proc. International Conference on Economic, Technical and Organizational Aspects on Product Configuration System,. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, 2004.
[4] G. Brunetti, and S. Grimm, "Feature ontologies for the explicit representation of shape semantic", International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 2005, vol. 23, no.2, pp. 192ÔÇö202, 2005.
[5] R. Fikes, M. Cutkosky, T. Gruber, and J. Van Baalen, "Knowledge sharing technology: project overview", Technical Report KSL 91-71, Stanford University, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, 1991.
[6] T.R. Gruber, J.M. Tenenbaum, and J.C. Weber, "Toward a knowledge medium for collaborative product development", in Proc. Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Design, Pittsburgh, 1992, pp. 413-432.
[7] T.R Gruber, "The Role of common ontology in achieving sharable, reusable knowledge bases", in Proc. Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning:, Cambridge, MA, 1991, pp. 601-602.
[8] T.R Gruber, "Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing", in Proc. International Workshop on Formal Ontology. Available as Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Report KSL-93-04, 1993.
[9] Merriam-Webster dictionary. Available online at: http://m-w.com.
[10] T.R. Gruber, "A Translation approach to portable ontology specifications", Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp.199-220, 1993.
[11] M. Uschold, and M. Gr├╝ninger, "Ontologies: principles, methods and applications", Knowledge Engineering review, vol. 11, no. 2, 1996.
[12] M. Gr├╝ninger, and M.S Fox, "Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies", in Proc. IJCAI 95 on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Monréal, 1995.
[13] M.F. Lopez, and A.G. Perez, "Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies", Knowledge Engineering review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp.129ÔÇö156, 2002.
[14] O. Corcho, M. Fernandez-Lopez, A. Gomez-Perez, and A. Lopez- Cima, "Building legal ontologies with METHONTOLOGY and WebODE" , 2004. Available online at: http://users.isoco.net/~ocorcho/documents/LawSemWeb2004_Corch oEtAl.pdf
[15] R. Prieto-Diaz, "A Faceted Approach to Building Ontologies", 2002. Available online at: https://users.cs.jmu.edu/prietorx/ Public/publications/BulidOntologiesRPD-ER2002.doc
[16] M. Denny, "Ontology building: a survey of editing tools", 2002. Available online at: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/11/06/ontologies.html
[17] N. Fridman Noy, and D. McGuinness, "Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology",2001. Available online at: http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontology101/ontolog y101-noy-mcguinness.html
[18] W.F. Bronsvoort, et al "Essential Developments in Feature Modelling", in Proc. CAD/Graphics-2001, seventh International Conference on Computer aided Design and Computer Graphics, Kunming, China, 2001, pp.6--15.
[19] OWL web ontology language guide. W3c Recommendation. 10 Feb 2004.
[20] R. Sudarsan, et al. "Object oriented representation of electromechanical assemblies using UML", NIST internal report NISTIR 7057, 2003.
[21] R. Sudarsan et al., "Information models for product representation: core and assembly models", NIST internal report NISTIR 7173, 2004.
[22] E. Subrahmanian, et al., (2005) "Product Lifecycle Management support: a challenge in supporting product design and manufacturing in a networking economy", in Proc. International conference on Produt Lifecycle Management PLM-05, Lyon, France, july 2005, pp. 495-5006.