Creativity: A Motivational Tool for Interest and Conceptual Understanding in Science Education
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Creativity: A Motivational Tool for Interest and Conceptual Understanding in Science Education

Authors: Thienhuong Hoang

Abstract:

This qualitative, quantitative mixed-method study explores how students- motivation and interest in creative hands-on activities affected their conceptual understanding of science. The objectives of this research include developing a greater understanding about how creative activities, incorporated into the classroom as instructional strategies, increase student motivation and their learning or mastery of science concepts. The creative activities are viewed as a motivational tool, a specific type of task, which have an impact on student goals. Pre-and-post tests, pre-and-post interviews, and student responses measure motivational-goal theory variables, interest in the activity, and conceptual change. Implications for education and future research will be discussed.

Keywords: Science education, motivation, conceptual understanding, instructional strategies.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1085060

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1764

References:


[1] A. Taylor, "Learning science through creative activities," School Science Review, vol. 79, No. 286, pp. 39-46, 2007.
[2] S. Alao and J Guthrie, "Predicting conceptual understanding with cognitive and motivational variables," The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 92, No. 4, pp.243-255, 2000.
[3] T. DeBacker and M. Nelson, "Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type and ability," The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 245-256, 2005.
[4] M. Maehr, "Goal theory is not dead - not yet, anyway: A reflection on the special issue," Educational Psychological Review, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 117-185, 2003.
[5] D. Hodson, Teaching and Learning Science: A Personalized Approach. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 2002.
[6] P. Pintrich, D. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. McKeachie, "Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ)," Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 53, pp. 801-813, 2003.
[7] P. Pintrich, R. Marx, and R. Boyle, "Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change," Review of Educational Research, vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 167-199, 2004.
[8] M. Dowson and D. McInerney, "What do students say about their motivational goals?: Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation," Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 28, pp. 91-113, 2006.
[9] J. Leach and P. Scott, "Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing up the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning," Studies in Science Education, vol. 38, pp. 115-142, 2002.
[10] B. Phillips, "Can creativity be assessed/ Why not allow an experience to be its own reward and, if anything, reflection will naturally result?," Orbit, vol. 46, pp. 407-441, 2002.
[11] H. Gardner, Intelligence Reframed. New York: Basic Books, 2005.
[12] J. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2006.
[13] R. Sternberg, The Nature of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[14] M. Miles and M. Huberman, Quantitative Data analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. London: Sage Publications, Inc, 2004.
[15] L. Aday, Designing and Conducting Health Surveys: A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
[16] P. Hewson and M. Hewson, "The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction," Instructional Science, vol. 13, pp. 1-13, 2006.
[17] B. Woolnough, "Motivating students or teaching pure science?," School science review, vol. 78, No. 285, pp. 67-72, 2005.
[18] M. Braud, "Electric drama to improve understanding in science," School Science Review, vol. 81, No. 294, pp. 35-41, 2006.
[19] P. Johnson-Laid. Freedom and Constraint in Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2006.
[20] G. Wiggins, Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
[21] G. Posner, K. Strike, P. Hewson, P., and W. Gertzog, "Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change," Science Education, vol. 66, pp. 211-227, 2007.