Exploring Perceptions and Practices About Information and Communication Technologies in Business English Teaching in Pakistan

Authors: M. Athar Hussain, N.B. Jumani, Munazza Sultana., M. Zafar Iqbal

Abstract:

Language Reforms and potential use of ICTs has been a focal area of Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. Efforts are being accelerated to incorporate fast expanding ICTs to bring qualitative improvement in language instruction in higher education. This paper explores how university teachers are benefitting from ICTs to make their English class effective and what type of problems they face in practicing ICTs during their lectures. An in-depth qualitative study was employed to understand why language teachers tend to use ICTs in their instruction and how they are practicing it. A sample of twenty teachers from five universities located in Islamabad, three from public sector and two from private sector, was selected on non-random (Snowball) sampling basis. An interview with 15 semi-structured items was used as research instruments to collect data. The findings reveal that business English teaching is facilitated and improved through the use of ICTs. The language teachers need special training regarding the practices and implementation of ICTs. It is recommended that initiatives might be taken to equip university language teachers with modern methodology incorporating ICTs as focal area and efforts might be made to remove barriers regarding the training of language teachers and proper usage of ICTs.

Keywords: Information and communication technologies, internet assisted learning, teaching business English, online instructional content.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1085012

References:

[1] Government of Pakistan (1998-2010). National Education Policy, Islamabad: Ministry of Education.
[2] Warschauer, M. (2000). The changing global economy and the future of English teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 511-533.
[3] Okamoto, T. (2004). How a web based course facilitates acquisition of English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 33-49. Retrieved from www.msu.edu.com.
[4] Whitehead, D. & Whitehead, G. (1993). English for business. Oxford: M. Simple Books.
[5] Fotos, S. & Browne, C. (2004). The development of CALL and current options. In S. Fotos and C.M.Browne (Eds), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
[6] Susser, B. & Robb. T. N. (2004). Evaluation of ESL/EFL instructional websites.In S. Fotos & C. M. Browne (Eds.), NEW perspective on CALL for second language classroom. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
[7] Browne, C. & Gerrity, S. (2004). Setting up and maintaining a CALL laboratory. New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 171-198). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
[8] Hassan, S. (2005). Reading and Writing skills for advanced students of business English in Pakistan. NUML, Islamabad. Unpublished PhD Thesis.
[9] Finely, L & Hartman, D. (2004). Institutional change and resistance: Teacher preparatory faculty and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 319-337.
[10] Ertmer, P.A. (1999). Addressing first and second order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(4), 47-61.
[11] Chen, Yu-Li. (2008). Factors affecting the integration of information and communication technology in Language teaching. Asian EFL Journal. Professional teaching articles.
[12] Van Sachie, J. (1997). A World Wide Web survey on the use of information and communication technology in Education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 20:1, 85-92. Retrieved from www.informaworld.com on 25 June, 2009.
[13] Black, P. (1996). Changing the Subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: Routledge.
[14] Higher Education Commission (2006) Annual Report 2005-06, Islamabad.
[15] Maeers, M. & Cooper, D. (2002). A faculty of education as a community of learners: Growing to meet the demands of instruction and technology. Retrieved from www.eric.com.
[16] Davies, G. (2003). Perspectives on offline and online training initiatives.Language learning online: Towards best practice (pp. 193- 214). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
[17] Chen, H.J. (2003). Internet-assisted language learning and professional development. Seminar on multimedia English teaching, Chungtai institute of health sciences and technology, pp. 16-33.
[18] Safdar, M. (2008). Facilitating and empowering teachers through information and communication technologies. Conference Proceedings. Islamabad: SZBIST.
[19] Epper, R.M. (2001). The new economy meets the Ivory tower. Teaching faculty how to use technology: Best practices from leading institutions (pp. 1-18). Westport, CT: The American council on education, ORYX press.
[20] Terwindt, S. (2000). Constructivist learning. Faculty development (pp. 448-450). Retrieved from www.eric.com.
[21] Brown, H.D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman.
[22] Solobodina, T. (2000). Faculty development in technology for teachers of English for specific purposes. Retrieved from www.eric.com on October, 2006.
[23] Clark, K. (2000). Power Web searching techniques for teacher educators. ERIC document reproduction service no. ED 444497, retrieved from www.eric.com.
[24] Shrivastava, P. (1998). Learning community. Retrieved from www.Environmentalintel.com/Soc.
[25] Merriam, S.B. (2002). Assessing and evaluating qualitative research: Examples for discussion and analysis. Qualitative Research in Practice (pp. 18-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Company.