Virtual Environments...Vehicle for Pedagogical Advancement

Authors: Elizabeth M. Hodge, Sharon K. Collins, Eric Kisling

Abstract:

Virtual environments are a hot topic in academia and more importantly in courses offered via distance education. Today-s gaming generation view virtual worlds as strong social and interactive mediums for communicating and socializing. And while institutions of higher education are challenged with increasing enrollment while balancing budget cuts, offering effective courses via distance education become a valid option. Educators can utilize virtual worlds to offer students an enhanced learning environment which has the power to alleviate feelings of isolation through the promotion of communication, interaction, collaboration, teamwork, feedback, engagement and constructivists learning activities. This paper focuses on the use of virtual environments to facilitate interaction in distance education courses so as to produce positive learning outcomes for students. Furthermore, the instructional strategies were reviewed and discussed for use in virtual worlds to enhance learning within a social context.

Keywords: Virtual Environments, Second Life, Instructional Strategies and Technology

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1084700

References:

[1] New Media Consortium and the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, (2007). The Horizon Report 2007 Edition. Creative Commons. Stanford, CA.
[2] Bonk, C.J., (2004). The Perfect E-Storm: emerging technology, enormous learner demand, enhanced pedagogy, and erased budgets. The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.
[3] Zuhairi, A., Wahyono, E., & Suratinah, S. (2006). The historical context, current development and future challenges of distance education in Indonesia. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 1, 95-101.
[4] Bannan-Ritland, B., Bragg, W. & Collins, M. (2006). Linking Theory, Educational Constructs, and Instructional Strategies in Web-based Course Development. Retrieved July 14, 2006, from http://www.virtual.gmu.edu/EDIT611/BannanWBC.pdf.
[5] Wenger, E. (2002). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
[6] Picciano, A. (2001). Distance learning: Making connections across virtual space and time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
[7] Dede, C. (2004, September). Enabling distributed learning communities via emerging technologies - Part one. T.H.E. Journal, 32(2), 12-22. www.thejournal.com
[8] Bielaczyc, K. & Collins, A. (1999) Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.): Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269-292). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[9] Perraton, H. (1988). A theory for distance education. In D. Sewart, D., Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 95-113). New York: Routledge.
[10] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher order psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[11] Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[12] Hodge, E., Bosse, M., Faulconer, J., & Fewell, M., (2006). Mimicking proximity: The role of distance education in forming communities of learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, Vol. 3, No. 12.
[13] Brown, A., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., and Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, pp. 188-228. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.
[14] Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
[15] Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-19.
[16] Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[17] Lave, J. & Wenger, W. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[18] Swan, K. & Shea, P. (2005). The development of virtual learning communities. In. S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks, pp. 239-260. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[19] New Media Consortium (2007). Social Networking, the “Third Place,” and the Evolution of Communication. New Media Consortium, Creative Commons. Retrieved January 20, 2008 from, http://creativecommons.org/
[20] Duemer, L., Fontenot, D., Gumfory, K., Kallus, M., Larsen, J., Schafer, S., et al., (2002). The use of online synchronous discussion groups to enhance community formation and professional identity development. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1. Retrieved September 12, 2008 from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/
[21] Lobel, M., Neubauer, M., & Swedburg, R. (2002). Elements of group interaction in a real-time synchronous online learning-by-doing classroom without F2F participation. USDLA Journal. 16. Retrieved March 5, 2005, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/
[22] Park, Y. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2007). Synchronous learning experiences: Distance and residential learners’ perspectives in a blended graduate course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3) 245-264.
[23] Robbins-Bell, S., (September/October, 2008). Higher education as virtual conversation. EDUCAUSE Review. 43(5). Retrieved October 3, 2008 from http://connect.educause.edu/Library/EDUCAUSE+
[24] Review/HigherEducationasVirtualC/47220
[25] Rickard, W. and Oblinger, D. (2004). Unlocking the potential of gaming technology. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/8/c/98c108c
[26] 2-ade9-4c60-a938-d508eea54cdc/Unlockingt
[27] hePotentialofGamingTechnology.pdf.