Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30184
A Socio-Ecological Study of Sacred Groves and Memorial Parks: Cases from USA and India
Abstract:The concept of sacred and nature have long been interlinked. Various cultural aspects such as religion, faith, traditions bring people closer to nature and the natural environment. Memorial Parks and Sacred Groves are examples of two such cultural landscapes that exist today. The project mainly deals with the significance of such sites to the environment and the deep rooted significance it has to the people. These parks and groves play an important role in biodiversity conservation and environmental protection. There are many differences between the establishment of memorial parks and sacred groves, but the underlying significance is the same. Sentiments, emotions play an important role in landscape planning and management. Hence the people and communities living at these sites need to be involved in any planning activity or decisions. The conservation of the environment should appeal to the sentiments of the people; the need to be 'with nature' should be used in the setting up of memorial forests and in the preservation of sacred groves.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1335298Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1948
 Beyond Belief: Linking faiths and protected areas to support biodiversity conservation WWF Report 2005
 Gadgil, M., 1985. Social restraints on resource utilization: The Indian experience.Culture and Conservation: The Human Dimension in Environmental Planning. Croom Helm, Dublin.
 Pandey, D.N., 1998. Ethnoforestry: Local Knowledge for Sustainable Forestry and Livelihood Security. Asia Forest Network & Himanshu, Berkeley, New Delhi and Udaipur.
 Chandran, S., Gadgil, M., 1998. Sacred groves and sacred trees of Uttara Kannada. Lifestyle and Ecology. Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and D.K. Printworld, Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
 Ramakrishnan P .S. Conserving the sacred for biodiversity: the conception framework, Proceedings of KFRI Workshop. 1997.
 Chandrakanth, M.G., Romm, J., 1991. Sacred forests, secular forest policies and people's actions. Natural Resources Journal, 31(4): 741- 756.
 Chandrakanth, M.G., Bhat, M.G, & Accavva M.S 2004. Socio-economic changes and sacred groves in south India: Protecting a community based resource management institution. Natural Resources Forum 28 (2): 102- 111
 Singh, N. A Study of Human Impact on Sacred Groves in India. Thesis at the Center for International Studies f Ohio University, 2006
 Godbole, A 1998. Role of sacred groves in biodiversity conservation with local people-s participation: A case study from Ratnagiri district, Maharashtra. Conserving the sacred: For biodiversity management (pp 233-246). New Hampshire: Science Publishers.
 Nagaraj, M.G. 1998, Kembatti Holeyara Samskrithi, Karnataka Sahithya Academy, Bangalore, India.
 NM Nadkarni, GG Parker, HB Rinker, DM Jarzen - Forest Canopies, 2004 - Academic Press.