The Energy Impacts of Using Top-Light Daylighting Systems for Academic Buildings in Tropical Climate
Careful design and selection of daylighting systems can greatly help in reducing not only artificial lighting use, but also decrease cooling energy consumption and, therefore, potential for downsizing air-conditioning systems. This paper aims to evaluate the energy performance of two types of top-light daylighting systems due to the integration of daylight together with artificial lighting in an existing examinaton hall in University Kebangsaan Malaysia, based on a hot and humid climate. Computer simulation models have been created for building case study (base case) and the two types of toplight daylighting designs for building energy performance evaluation using the VisualDOE 4.0 building energy simulation program. The finding revealed that daylighting through top-light systems is a very beneficial design strategy in reducing annual lighting energy consumption and the overall total annual energy consumption.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1083825Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1536
 Littlefair PJ. Predicting lighting energy use under daylight linked lighting controls. Building research & information. 1998;26:208-22.
 Li DHW, Lam JC. Measurements of solar radiation and illuminance on vertical surfaces and daylighting implications. Renewable energy. 2000;20:389-404.
 Krarti M. Energy audit of building systems: an engineering approach: CRC Press; 2010.
 Doulos L, Tsangrassoulis A, Topalis F. Quantifying energy savings in daylight responsive systems: The role of dimming electronic ballasts. Energy and Buildings. 2008;40:36-50.
 Li DHW, Lam TNT, Wong S. Lighting and energy performance for an office using high frequency dimming controls. Energy conversion and management. 2006;47:1133-45.
 Lee ES, Selkowitz SE. The New York Times Headquarters daylighting mockup: Monitored performance of the daylighting control system. Energy and Buildings. 2006;38:914-29.
 Onayg─▒l S, G├╝ler ├û. Determination of the energy saving by daylight responsive lighting control systems with an example from Istanbul. Building and environment. 2003;38:973-7.
 Plympton P, Conway S, Epstein K. Daylighting in Schools-Improving Student Performance and Health at a Price Schools Can Afford. AMERICAN SOLAR ENERGY SOCIETY; AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS; 2000. p. 487-92.
 Li DHW, Lam JC. An investigation of daylighting performance and energy saving in a daylit corridor. Energy and Buildings. 2003;35:365- 73.
 Chirarattananon S, Chaiwiwatworakul P, Pattanasethanon S. Daylight availability and models for global and diffuse horizontal illuminance and irradiance for Bangkok. Renewable energy. 2002;26:69-89.
 Rae MS. The IESNA Lighting Handbook. Reference & Application, 9th edition, New York, NY, IESNA. 2000.
 Chirarattananon S, Chaiwiwatworakul P, Patanasethanon S. Challenges of daylighting with the luminosity and variability of the tropical sky. Lighting Research and Technology. 2003;35:3-10.
 Visual D. 2.6, Version 2.61, Eley Associates, San Francisco, CA, 1999.
 Wagner BS, Rosenfeld A. Summary report of building energy compilation and analysis (BECA). Part V. Validation of energy-analysis computer programs. Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (USA); 1983.
 Ward GJ. The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. ACM; 1994. p. 459-72.