Research Trend Analysis – A Sample in the Field of Information Systems
As research performance in academia is treated as one of indices for national competency, many countries devote much attention and resources to increasing their research performance. Understand the research trend is the basic step to improve the research performance. The goal of this research is to design an analysis system to evaluate research trends from analyzing data from different countries. In this paper, information system researches in Taiwan and other countries, including Asian countries and prominent countries represented by the Group of Eight (G8) is used as example. Our research found the trends are varied in different countries. Our research suggested that Taiwan-s scholars can pay more attention to interdisciplinary applications and try to increase their collaboration with other countries, in order to increase Taiwan's competency in the area of information science.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1083455Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1509
 Van Damme, D. (2001). Quality issues in the internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 41, 415-441.
 Bordons, M., Fernandez, M. T., & Gomez, I. (2002). Advantages and limitations in the use of impact fator measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics, 53(2), 195-206.
 Ball, R., & Tunger, D. (2006). Bibliometric analysis - A new business area for information professionals in libraries? Scientometrics, 66(3), 561-577. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0041-0.
 Davis, P. M. (2011). Do discounted journal access programs help researchers in sub-Saharan Africa? A bibliometric analysis. Learned Publishing, 24(4), 287-298. doi: 10.1087/20110406.
 Sengupta, I. N. (1985). Bibliometrics: A bird's eye view. IASLIC Bulletin, 60, 167-174.
 Schloegl, C., & Stock, W. G. (2004). Impact and relevance of LIS journals: A scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals - Citation analysis versus reader survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(13), 1155-1168. doi: 10.1002/asi.20070.
 Voracek, M., & Loibl, L. M. (2009). Scientometric Analysis and Bibliograph of Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Research, 1998-2008. Psychological Reports, 104(3), 922-956. doi: 10.2466/pr0.104.3.922-956.
 Van Raan, A. F. J. (1990). Bibliometric indicators as research performance evaluation tools. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European University Institute Conference on 'Research Management in Europe Today', Florence.