Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Understanding Grip Choice and Comfort Whilst Hoovering

Authors: S.R.Kamat, A.Yoxall, C.Craig , M.J.Carré, J.Rowson

Abstract:

The hand is one of the essential parts of the body for carrying out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Individuals use their hands and fingers in everyday activities in the both the workplace and home. Hand-intensive tasks require diverse and sometimes extreme levels of exertion, depending on the action, movement or manipulation involved. The authors have undertaken several studies looking at grip choice and comfort. It is hoped that in providing improved understanding of discomfort during ADLs this will aid in the design of consumer products. Previous work by the authors outlined a methodology for calculating pain frequency and pain level for a range of tasks. From an online survey undertaken by the authors with regards manipulating objects during everyday tasks, tasks involving gripping were seen to produce the highest levels of pain and discomfort. Questioning of the participants showed that cleaning tasks were seen to be ADL's that produced the highest levels of discomfort, with women feeling higher levels of discomfort than men. This paper looks at the methodology for calculating pain frequency and pain level with particular regards to gripping activities. This methodology shows that activities such as mopping, sweeping and hoovering shows the highest numbers of pain frequency and pain level at 3112.5 frequency per month while the pain level per person doing this action was 0.78.The study then uses thin-film force sensors to analyze the force distribution in the hand whilst hoovering and compares this for differing grip styles and genders. Women were seen to have more of their hand under a higher pressure than men when undertaking hoovering. This suggests that women may feel greater discomfort than men since their hand is at a higher pressure more of the time.

Keywords: hovering, grip, pain

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1327780

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1136

References:


[1] Fellow, G.L., Frevivalds, A., Ergonomics evaluation od a foam rubber grip for tool handles. Applied Ergonomics, 1991, 22(4), pp 225 - 230.
[2] Arhazadeh, F., Mital, A., . Injuries due to hand tools; result of a questionnaire. Applied. Ergonomics, 1987, 18(4), pp 273 -278.
[3] Chao, A., Kumar. A.J., Emery, C.T.N.D., Nagarajarao,K., You.,H.,. An ergonomic evaluation of cleco pliers, Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, 2000.
[4] Freund, F., Takala, E.P., Toivonen, R.,. Effects of two ergonomic aids on the usability of an in-line screwdriver. Applied Ergonomics, 2000, 31, pp 371-376
[5] Chang, S.R., Park, S., Freivalds, A., Ergonomic evaluation of the effect of handle types on garden tools. Int. Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1999, 24, pp 99-105.
[6] Slater, K., ed. Human Comfort. (Springfield, IL, 1985).
[7] Richards, L.G., On the psychology of passenger comfort. Human Factors in Transport Research, 1980, 2, pp15- 23.
[8] Kadefors, R., Areskoug ,A., Dahlman, S., Kilbom, A., Sperling, L., Wikstrom, L., An approach to ergonomic evaluation of hand tools. Applied Ergonomics, 1993, 24(3), pp 203-211
[9] Zhang, L., Helander, M.G., Drury, C.G.,Identifying factors of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Human Factors, 1996, 38(3), pp 377 - 389
[10] de Looze, M.P., de Kuijt-Evers. L.F.M., van Dieen. Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationship with objective meansures. Ergonomics, 2003, 46(10), pp 985-997.
[11] Gurram, R. Rakheja, S., Gouw, G.J., A study of hand grip pressure distribution and EMG of finger flexor muscle under dynamic loads. Ergonomics, 1995, 38(4), pp. 684- 699.
[12] Habes. D.J., G., K.A., An electromographic study of maximum torques and upper extremity muscle activity in simulated screw driving tasks. Int. Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1997, 20,pp 339 - 915.
[13] Niemela, T., Leppanen, M., Paivinen, M., Mattila, M., Evaluation of an experimental testing system for non-powered hand tools. In. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress2000.
[14] Chang, H.H., Wang., M.J.J. Evaluating factors that influence hand arm stress while operating an electric screwdriver. Applied Ergonomics, 2000, 31, pp 283 - 289.
[15] Marcotte, P,. Y.Aldien Y., Boileau, P-E., Rakheja S., and Boutin J., Effect of handle size and hand-handle contact force on the biodynamic responses of the hand-arm system under Z-axis vibration . Journal of Sound Vibration 2005, 283, pp 1071-1091.
[16] Aliden,Y., Welcome, D., Rakheja, S., Dong, R., Boileau. P-E., Contact pressure distribution at hand-handle interface: role of hand force and handle size. Int. Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2005, 35, pp 267-286.
[17] L.F.M.Kuijt-Evers, T.Boseh, M.A.Huysmans, M.P.de Looze, P.Vink. Association between objective and subjective measurement of comfort and discomfort in hand tool.. Journal Applied Ergonomics, 2007, 38, pp 645 - 654.
[18] Ingrid, Thyberg, Ursula A.M.Hass, Ulta Nordenskiold, Bjokn Gerdle, Thomas Skogh. Activity limitation in Rheumatoid Arthritis correlated with reduced grip force regardless of sex: The Swedish TIRA Project Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research). Vol 53 No 6, December 15, 2005,pp 886-896
[19] Carre M., J. Rowson.J, A Yoxall, S.R. Kamat A Preliminary Study into the Human Perception of Hand Pain for Activities Common in Daily Life. Conference Global Ergonomic Denmark 26 - 28 Jun 2009