Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30455
VaR Forecasting in Times of Increased Volatility

Authors: Milan Rippel, Ivo Jánský

Abstract:

The paper evaluates several hundred one-day-ahead VaR forecasting models in the time period between the years 2004 and 2009 on data from six world stock indices - DJI, GSPC, IXIC, FTSE, GDAXI and N225. The models model mean using the ARMA processes with up to two lags and variance with one of GARCH, EGARCH or TARCH processes with up to two lags. The models are estimated on the data from the in-sample period and their forecasting accuracy is evaluated on the out-of-sample data, which are more volatile. The main aim of the paper is to test whether a model estimated on data with lower volatility can be used in periods with higher volatility. The evaluation is based on the conditional coverage test and is performed on each stock index separately. The primary result of the paper is that the volatility is best modelled using a GARCH process and that an ARMA process pattern cannot be found in analyzed time series.

Keywords: risk analysis, autoregressive process, EGARCH, conditional volatility, VaR, TARCH, GARCH, moving average process

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082787

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1086

References:


[1] Akgiray, V. (1989): "Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Time Series of Stock Returns: Evidence and Forecasts. The Journal of Business, 62, 55- 80.
[2] Angelidis, T., Benos, A., & Deggianakis, S. (2003). The Use of GARCH Models in VaR Estimation.
[3] Black, F. (1976). Studies of stock market volatility changes. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section , 177-181.
[4] Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327.
[5] Brooks, C., & Persand, G. (2003). The effect of asymmetries on stock index return Value-at-Risk estimates. The Journal of Risk Finance, 4, 29-42.
[6] Christoffersen, P. (1998). Evaluation interval forecasts. International Economic Review, 39, 841-862.
[7] Costello, A., Asem, E., & Gardner, E. (2008). Comparison of historically simulated VaR: Evidence from oil prices. Energy economics, 30, 2154-1266.
[8] Diebold, F., & Mariano, R. S. (2002). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20 (1), 134-144.
[9] Engle, R. F. (1982). Autogregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987-1008.
[10] JánskÛ, I. (2011). Value-at-risk forecasting with the ARMA-GARCH family of models during the recent financial crisis. Prague: Institute of Economic Studies.
[11] Mandelbrot, B. (1963). The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices. The Journal of Business, 36, 394-419.
[12] Mandelbrot, B. (1967). The Variation of Some Other Speculative Prices. The Journal of Business, 40, 393-413.
[13] Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59, 347-370.
[14] Pagan, A. R., & Schwert, G. W. (1990). Alternative models for conditional stock volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 45 (1-2), 267-290.
[15] Rabemananjara, R., & Zakoïan, J. M. (1993). Threshold ARCH models and asymmetries in volatility. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8, 31- 49.
[16] Zakoïan, J. M. (1994). Threshold heteroskedastic models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, 931 - 955.