Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Determination and Assessment of Ground Motion and Spectral Parameters for Iran
Authors: G. Ghodrati Amiri, M. Khorasani, Razavian Ameri, M.Mohamadi Dehcheshmeh, S.Fathi
Abstract:
Many studies have been conducted for derivation of attenuation relationships worldwide, however few relationships have been developed to use for the seismic region of Iranian plateau and only few of these studies have been conducted for derivation of attenuation relationships for parameters such as uniform duration. Uniform duration is the total time during which the acceleration is larger than a given threshold value (default is 5% of PGA). In this study, the database was same as that used previously by Ghodrati Amiri et al. (2007) with same correction methods for earthquake records in Iran. However in this study, records from earthquakes with MS< 4.0 were excluded from this database, each record has individually filtered afterward, and therefore the dataset has been expanded. These new set of attenuation relationships for Iran are derived based on tectonic conditions with soil classification into rock and soil. Earthquake parameters were chosen to be hypocentral distance and magnitude in order to make it easier to use the relationships for seismic hazard analysis. Tehran is the capital city of Iran wit ha large number of important structures. In this study, a probabilistic approach has been utilized for seismic hazard assessment of this city. The resulting uniform duration against return period diagrams are suggested to be used in any projects in the area.Keywords: Attenuation Relationships, Iran, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, Tehran, Uniform Duration
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1055186
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1694References:
[1] Ghodrati Amiri, G., Mahdavian, A. and Manouchehri Dana, F. (2007), Attenuation Relationships for Iran, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 11(4), 469-492.
[2] Ghodrati Amiri, G., Rokneddin, K., KarimpourFard, M., JafarianMarzouni, Y. and RazavianAmrei, S.A. (2006), Seismic hazard assessment of southern Iran dry docks, 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland .
[3] Jalali, A. and Hakimvand V. (2006), Effect of ground motion duration on seismic response of steel MRF structures, 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
[4] Naeim, F. (2001), the seismic design handbook, Second edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, United States of America.
[5] Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (2005) Standard No. 2800, Third Revision, Building & Housing Research Center, Iran (In Persian)
[6] McGuire, R.M. (2001), Deterministic vs. Probabilistic Earthquake Hazards and Risks, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Earthquake Engineering, 21, 377-384 .
[7] Berberian, M., Ghoreishi, M., Ravesh, B.A., and Ashjaei, A.M., 1983, Seismotectonic and Earthquake Fault Hazard Investigations in the Tehran Region, Geological Survey of Iran, Report No. 56. (In Persian)
[8] Nowroozi, A., 1985, Empirical relations between magnitude and fault parameters for earthquakes in Iran, Bulletin of the Siesmological Society of America 75(5), 1327-1338.
[9] Iranian Geological Survey, http://www.ngdir.com.
[10] Berberian, M., 1994, Natural Hazards & the First Earthquake Catalogue of Iran, Vol. 1: Historical Hazards in Iran Prior to 1900, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, (IIEES).
[11] Nabavi, S.M., 1978, Historical earthquakes in Iran, 300BC - 1900 AD, Journal of Earth and Space Physics 7, 70-117.
[12] Ambraseys, N.N. and Melville, C.P., 1982, A History of Persian Earthquakes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Britain).
[13] Kijko, A., 2000, Statistical estimation of maximum regional earthquake magnitude Mmax, Workshop of Seismicity Modeling in Seismic Hazard Mapping, Poljce, Slovenia, Geological Survey, 1-10.
[14] Gardner, J. K. and Knopoff, L., 1974, Is the sequence of earthquake in southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?, Bulletin of the Siesmological Society of America 64(5), 1363-1367.
[15] IRCOLD, Iranian Committee of Large Dams, 1994, Relationship between MS and Mb , Internal Report. (In Persian)
[16] Cornell, C.A., 1968, Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bulletin of the Siesmological Society of America 58(5), 1583-1606.
[17] Green, A.R. and Hall, W.J., 1994, An Overview of Selected Seismic Hazard Analysis Methodologies, A Report on a Research Project, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.
[18] Bender, B. and Perkins, D.M., 1987, SEISRISKΙΙΙ: A Computer Program for Seismic Hazard Estimation, U.S. Geological Survey, Bulletin 1772.
[19] Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, 2005, Standard No.2800, Third Revision, Building & Housing Research Center, Iran. (In Persian)