Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31743
Network Analysis in a Natural Perturbed Ecosystem

Authors: Nelson F.F. Ebecken, Gilberto C. Pereira

Abstract:

The objective of this work is to explicit knowledge on the interactions between the chlorophyll-a and nine meroplankton larvae of epibenthonic fauna. The studied case is the Arraial do Cabo upwelling system, Southeastern of Brazil, which provides different environmental conditions. To assess this information a network approach based in probability estimative was used. Comparisons among the generated graphs are made in the light of different water masses, application of Shannon biodiversity index, and the closeness and betweenness centralities measurements. Our results show the main pattern among different water masses and how the core organisms belonging to the network skeleton are correlated to the main environmental variable. We conclude that the approach of complex networks is a promising tool for environmental diagnostic.

Keywords: Coastal upwelling, Ecological networks, Plankton - interactions, Environmental analysis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082599

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1489

References:


[1] Halpern, B.S., Selkoe, K.A., Micheli, F., Kappel, K., 2007. Evaluating and ranking the vulnerability of global marine ecosystems to anthropogenic threats. Conservation Biology 21, 1301-1315.
[2] Halpern, B.S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K.A., Kappel, C.V., Micheli, F., D'Agrosa, C., Bruno, J.F., Casey, K.S., Ebert, C., Fox, H.E., Fujita, R., Heinemann, D., Lenihan, H.S., Madin, E.M.P., Perry, M.T., Selig, E.R., Spalding, M., Steneck, R., Watson, R., 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319, 948- 952.
[3] Levin, S.A., Lubchenco J. 2008. Resilience, robustness, and marine ecosystem based management. Bioscience 58, 1-11.
[4] Palumbi S,McLeod KL, Grunbaum D. 2008. Ecosystems in action: Lessons from marine ecology about recovery, resistance, and reversibility. Bioscience 58 (1): 33-42.
[5] (USCOP) US Commission on Ocean Policy. 2004. An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century.Washington (DC): USCOP.
[6] Borja, A., D.M. Dauer, 2008. Assessing the environmental quality status in estuarine and coastal systems: comparing methodologies and indices. Ecological Indicators, 8(4): 331-337.
[7] Windhorst, W., Colijn, F., Kabuta, S., Remi Laane, R., Lenhart, H.J. 2005. Defining a good ecological status of coastal waters ÔÇö a case study for the Elbe plume. Environmental
[8] Pereira, G.C., Coutinho, R., Ebecken, N.F.F. 2008. Data Mining for environmental analysis and diagnostic: a case study of upwelling ecosystem of Arraial do Cabo. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 56(1):1-12.
[9] Norberg, J. 2004. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A complex adaptive systems approach. Limnol. Oceanogr., 49(4, part 2), 1269- 1277.
[10] Raffaelli, D., Van den Putten, W. H., Person, L., Wardle, D. A., Petchey, O. L., Koricheva, J., Van den Heijden, M. G. A., 2002. Multi-trophic processes and ecosystem function. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Ed. By M. Loreau,
[11] Dunne, J.A., Williams, R.J., Martinez, N.D., 2002. Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance. Ecol. Lett. 5, 558-567.
[12] Huxel, G.R., Mc Cann, K. 1998. Food Web Stability: The Influence of Trophic Flows across Habitats. The American Naturalist 152 (3), 460- 469. Jordán, F., W-C. Liu and A.J. Davis. 2006.
[13] Albert R, Jeong H. Barabási AL, 2000, Error and attack tolerance of complex network. Nature 406: 378-382.
[14] Strogatz SH, 2001. Exploring complex networks. Nature 420: 268-276.
[15] Kolasa, J., 2005. Complexity, system integration, and susceptibility to change: biodiversity connection. Ecol. Complex. 2, 431-442. Levin SA,
[16] Libralato, S., V. Christensen and D. Pauly. 2006. A method for identifying keystone species in food web models. Ecological Modeling 195:153-171.
[17] Gonzalez AMM, Dalsgaard B, Olesen JM, 2010. Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination network. Ecological Complexity 7, 36-43.
[18] Castelao, R. M., Barth, J. A., 2005. Upwelling around Cabo Frio, Brazil: The importance of wind stress curl, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L03602.
[19] Pereira, G. C., Evsukoff, A., and Ebecken, N. F. F. 2009. Fuzzy modelling of chlorophyll production in a Brazilian upwelling system, Ecol. Model., 220, 1506- 1512.
[20] Pereira, G.C., Ebecken, N.F.F. 2009. Knowledge discovering for coastal waters classification. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 8604-8609.
[21] Newman, M.E.J. 2003. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Arxiv preprint cond-mat/0309045. 1-15 pp.
[22] Shivaram, N. 2005. The Betweenness Centrality of Biological Networks. Thesis of the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 74p.