Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Paradigm and Paradox: Knowledge Management and Business Ethics

Authors: A. Evans, M. McKinley

Abstract:

Knowledge management (KM) is generally considered to be a positive process in an organisation, facilitating opportunities to achieve competitive advantage via better quality information handling, compilation of expert know-how and rapid response to fluctuations in the business environment. The KM paradigm as portrayed in the literature informs the processes that can increase intangible assets so that corporate knowledge is preserved. However, in some instances, knowledge management exists in a universe of dynamic tension among the conflicting needs to respect privacy and intellectual property (IP), to guard against data theft, to protect national security and to stay within the laws. While the Knowledge Management literature focuses on the bright side of the paradigm, there is also a different side in which knowledge is distorted, suppressed or misappropriated due to personal or organisational motives (the paradox). This paper describes the ethical paradoxes that occur within the taxonomy and deontology of knowledge management and suggests that recognising both the promises and pitfalls of KM requires wisdom.

Keywords: business ethics, data, knowledge, knowledgemanagement, privacy, protection.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1334936

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1758

References:


[1] Alter, S. (2006). Goals and Tactics on the Dark Side of Knowledge Management. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences.
[2] Argandona, A. (2003). The New Economy: Ethical Issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 44:3-22.
[3] Baskerville, R. & Dulipovici, A. (2006). The Ethics of Knowledge Transfers and Conversions: Property or Privacy Rights? Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[4] Blodgett, J.G., Lu, L-C., Rose, G.M. & Vitell, S.J. (2001). Ethical Sensitivity to Stakeholder Interests: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (2): 190-202
[5] Choi, S.Y., Kang, Y.S. & Lee, H. (2008). The effects of socio-technical enablers on knowledge sharing: an exploratory examination. Journal of Information Science, 34(5): 742-754.
[6] Gordon-Till, J. (2002). Applied ethics in business information units. Business Information Review, 2: 48-54.
[7] Gupta, B., Lakshmi, S.I. & Aronson, J.E. (2000). Knowledge Management: Practices and Challenges. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(1):17-21.
[8] Harshman, C.L., Harshman, E.F. (2008). "The Gordian Knot of Ethics: Understanding Leadership Effectiveness and Ethical Behavior" Journal of Business Ethics, 78: 175-192.
[9] Land, F., Nolas, S-M., and Amjad, U. (2004). "Knowledge Management: The Darker Side of Knowledge management." ETHICOMP 2004.
[10] Land, F., Amjad, U. and Nolas, S-M. (2007). The Ethics of Knowledge Management. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1): 1-9.
[11] Lang, J.C. (2001). Managerial concerns in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge management, 5(1): 43-57.
[12] Larrat, P., McKinley, M. (2004). "Competitive Intelligence in France: Intentional or Incidental?" Conference on Emerging Issues in Business and Technology.
[13] Lin, C-P. (2007). "To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, its Mediators and Antecedents." Journal of Business Ethics, 70:411-428
[14] Macdonald, J.E. & Beck-Dudley, C.L. (1994). Are Deontology and Teleology Mutually Exclusive? Journal of Business Ethics, 13: 615- 623.
[15] Martensson, M. (2000). A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3):204-216.
[16] Martinet, B., Marti, Y-M. (2001). "L-Intelligence économique et concurrentielle: les yeux et les oreilles de l-entreprise." 2nd edition, Paris: Editions d-Organisations.
[17] McAllister, B. and Cripe, B. (2008). "Improper Release of Proprietary Information." The CPA Journal, 78, 3: 52-55.
[18] McDermott, R. (1999). Why Information Technology Inspired But Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 42(4): 103-117.
[19] Rooney, D. & McKenna, B. (2007). Wisdom in Organisations: Whence and Whither. Social Epistomology, 21 (2): 113-138.
[20] Rowley, J. (2006). Where is the wisdom that we have lost in knowledge? Journal of Documentation, 62(2):251-270.
[21] Said, A., Bretones, D. (2009) "Economic Intelligence and Knowledge Management. Two complementary facets of the same issue." International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2(1): 1-26.
[22] Stanton, J.M. & Stam, K.R. (2003). Information Technology, Privacy, and Power within Organisations: a view from Boundary Theory and Social Exchange perspectives. Surveillance & Society, 1(2): 152-190.
[23] Styhre, A. (2002). The Knowledge-intensive Company and the Economy of Sharing: Rethinking Utility and Knowledge Management. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(4):228-236.
[24] The Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals. Online at www.scip.org/ci/.
[25] Trethewey, A. & Corman, S. (2001). Anticipating K-Commerce. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(4): 619-628.
[26] Wong, K.Y. (2005). Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 105(3): 261-279.
[27] Zack, M. (1999). "Managing Codified Knowledge." Sloan Management Review, 40(4): 45-48.