Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30172
Approximations to the Distribution of the Sample Correlation Coefficient
Abstract:Given a bivariate normal sample of correlated variables, (Xi, Yi), i = 1, . . . , n, an alternative estimator of Pearson’s correlation coefficient is obtained in terms of the ranges, |Xi − Yi|. An approximate confidence interval for ρX,Y is then derived, and a simulation study reveals that the resulting coverage probabilities are in close agreement with the set confidence levels. As well, a new approximant is provided for the density function of R, the sample correlation coefficient. A mixture involving the proposed approximate density of R, denoted by hR(r), and a density function determined from a known approximation due to R. A. Fisher is shown to accurately approximate the distribution of R. Finally, nearly exact density approximants are obtained on adjusting hR(r) by a 7th degree polynomial.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1334934Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1676
 A. M. Mathai, The concept of correlation and misinterpretations. International Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, 1998, 7: 157-167.
 R. A. Fisher, Distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika, 1915, 10: 507- 521.
 A. Winterbottom, A note on the derivation of Fisher-s transformation of the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 1979, 33: 142-143.
 H. Hotelling, New light on the correlation coefficient and its transforms. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B., 1953, 15: 193-232.
 A. K. Gayen, The frequency distribution of the product-moment correlation coefficient in random samples of any size drawn from non-normal universes. Biometrika, 1951, 38: 219-247.
 D. L. Hawkins, Using U statistics to derive the asymptotic distribution of Fisher-s Z statistic. The American Statistician, 1989, 43: 235-237.
 S. Konishi, An approximation to the distribution of the sample correlation coefficient. Biometrika, 1978, 65: 654-656.
 H.-T. Ha and S. B. Provost, A viable alternative to resorting to statistical tables. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 2007, 36: 1135-1151.