The Efficacy of Neurological Impress Method and Repeated Reading on Reading Fluency of Children with Learning Disabilities in Oyo State, Nigeria

Authors: A. O. Oladele

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to find out the effectiveness of neurological impress method and repeated reading technique on reading fluency of children with learning disabilities. Thirty primary four pupils in three public primary schools participated in the study. There were two experimental groups and a control. This research employed a 3 by 2 factorial matrix and the participants were taught for one session. Two hypotheses were formulated to guide the research. T-test was used to analyse the data gathered, and data analysis revealed that pupils exposed to the two treatment strategies had improvement in their reading fluency. It was recommended that the two strategies used in the study can be used to intervene in reading fluency problems in children with learning disabilities.

Keywords: Learning disabilities, neurological impress method, repeated reading, reading fluency.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1081457

References:

[1] Langenberg, (2000) Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read (Reports of the sub groups): Washington, D.C National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
[2] Wise, B.W, & Snyder,L (2007). Clinical judgements in identifying and teaching children with language based reading difficulties. USA: National Research Centre on Learning Disabilities.
[3] Omotoso, J.A (2001). Learning disability problems prevalent among elementary school age children in Ilorin metropolis: Implications for special education and counselling. Ife Psychological 9: 128 - 133
[4] National Association of School Psychologists: (2007). Identification of students with specific learning disabilities (Position Statement) Bethesda, M.D: Author
[5] National Reading Panel: (2002). Teaching children to read: An evidence based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implication for reading instruction. Washington. D.C: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
[6] Oakley, G (2003). Improving oral reading fluency and comprehension through the creation of talking books: Reading Online 6 (7)
[7] Ming, K & Dukes, C (2008) Fluency: A necessary ingredient in comprehensive reading instruction in inclusive classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus 4 (4) 1 - 14
[8] Benson, N (2008). Cattell - horn - carroll - cognitive abilities and reading achievement. Journal of Psychological-educational Assessment 26 (1) 27 - 41
[9] Flood,J,Lapp,D,& Fisher,D. (2005). Neurological impress method plus. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly 26 (2) 147 - 160
[10] Klauda, S.L & Gutherie J.T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension: Journal of Educational Psychology 100 (2) 310 - 321
[11] Young, C (2011). Reading fluency and implicit comprehension: Implications for research and instruction. http://www.thebestclass.org/index.html.retrived Oct. 2012
[12] Chard, D. J Vaughan, S & Tyler, B.J. (2002) A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities: Journal of Learning Disabilities; 35 (5) 386 - 406.
[13] Roberts, G, Torgesen, J.K, Boardman, A & Scammacca N. (2008). Evidence based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities: Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 23 (2) 63 - 69
[14] Spear-Swerling, L. (2006). Preventing and remediating difficulties with reading fluency: LD Online. Accessed October 1 2012 at http://www.idonline.org.spearswerling/8811
[15] Chrisman, T.A (2005). The effects of repeated reading and types of test on oral reading fluency: Ph.d Dissertation University of Pittsburgh.
[16] Kuhn, M.R & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency a review of developmental and remedial practices: Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (1) 3 - 21
[17] Wolf, M. & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention; Scientific Studies of Reading 5 211 - 238
[18] Therrein, W.J (2004). Fluency and comprehension goals as a result of repeated reading: A Meta - analysis: Remedial and Special Education 25 (4) 252 - 261
[19] Nelson, J.S., Alber, S.R. & Gordy, A. (2004) The effects of error correction and repeated reading on the reading achievement of students with learning disabilities;. Education and Treatment of Children; 27, 186 - 198
[20] Chalfouleas, S.M., Martens, B.K., Dobson, R.L, Weinstein, K.S.& Gardner, K.B (2004). Fluent Reading as the Improvement of Stimulus Control: Additive Effects of Performance Based Interventions to Repeated Reading on Students Reading and Error Rates. Journal of Behavioural Education; 13; 67 - 81
[21] Alber, S.R. Ramp, E, Martin, C. M & Anderson, L. (2005). The effects of repeated readings and prediction on the reading performance of students with EBD; Thirty first annual convention of the association for behaviour analysis; Chicago: IL.
[22] Feazell, V (2004). Reading accelerated programme: A school wide intervention. International Reading Association 58 (1) 66 - 72
[23] Heckleman, R. G. (1986). N.I.M revisited: An update on the neurological impress method and the presenting technique Academic Therapy 21, 411 - 421
[24] Barden, O (2009). From acting reading to reading for acting: A case study of the transformational power of reading. Journal of Adolescence and Adult Literacy, 53 (4) 293 - 302
[25] Learning Disabilities Association of America (1998) Reading methods and learning disabilities Pittsburgh: LDA New briefs March/ April 38 No 4
[26] Therrien, W.J. & Kubina, R.M. (2006). Developing reading fluency with repeated reading: Intervention in School and Clinic 41 (3) 156 - 160
[27] Hasbrouck, J & Tindal, G. A. (2006) Oral Reading Fluency Norms: A Valuable Assessment Tool for Reading Teacher. The Reading Teacher; 59(7) 636 - 644.