Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31108
Stakeholder Analysis: Who are the Key Actorsin Establishing and Developing Thai Independent Consumer Organizations?

Authors: P. Ondee, S. Pannarunothai


In Thailand, both the 1997 and the current 2007 Thai Constitutions have mentioned the establishment of independent organizations as a new mechanism to play a key role in proposing policy recommendations to national decision-makers in the interest of collective consumers. Over the last ten years, no independent organizations have yet been set up. Evidently, nobody could point out who should be key players in establishing provincial independent consumer bodies. The purpose of this study was to find definitive stakeholders in establishing and developing independent consumer bodies in a Thai context. This was a cross-sectional study between August and September 2007, using a postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up. The questionnaire was designed and used to obtain multiple stakeholder assessment of three key attributes (power, interest and influence). Study population was 153 stakeholders associated with policy decision-making, formulation and implementation processes of civil-based consumer protection in pilot provinces. The population covered key representatives from five sectors (academics, government officers, business traders, mass media and consumer networks) who participated in the deliberative forums at 10 provinces. A 49.7% response rate was achieved. Data were analyzed, comparing means of three stakeholder attributes and classification of stakeholder typology. The results showed that the provincial health officers were the definitive stakeholders as they had legal power, influence and interest in establishing and sustaining the independent consumer bodies. However, only a few key representatives of the provincial health officers expressed their own paradigm on the civil-based consumer protection. Most provincial health officers put their own standpoint of building civic participation at only a plan-implementation level. For effective policy implementation by the independent consumer bodies, the Thai government should provide budgetary support for the operation of the provincial health officers with their paradigm shift as well as their own clarified standpoint on corporate governance.

Keywords: Civic Participation, Civil Society, Stakeholder Analysis, consumerprotection, independent organization, policy decision-making

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1571


[1] Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2550. (August 24, 2007). Government gazette. 124(47). pp. 24-25.
[2] Constitution of Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2540. (October 11, 1997). Government gazette (in Thai). 114(55). p. 13.
[3] Kulsomboon, V., Sriwiriyanuparb, W., and Limsathit, Ph. (2005). Guideline on establishing an independent organization for consumer protection according to section 57 of the 1997 Constitution of Kingdoms of Thailand (in Thai). Bangkok: Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University.
[4] Office of the Council of State. (October 2002). Official Document No. 629/2002 of the Office of the Council of State: Drafting a particular law for establishing the independent organizations according to section 57 of the 1997 Constitution of Kingdoms of Thailand (in Thai).
[5] Office of the Council of State. (April 2002). Official Document No. 189/2002 of the Office of the Council of State: Opinions in establishing the independent organizations according to section 57 of the 1997 Constitution of Kingdoms of Thailand (in Thai).
[6] Wongwattanasan, C. (2000). Consumer protection law (in Thai). Bangkok: Winyuchon.
[7] Wankaew, Ch. B., Thabchumpon, N., Rattanadilok Na Puket, P., Samakkeetham, S., Katasila, S., Chiangsen, U., et al. (2004). Civic participation in economic and social development processes under the Constitution of 1997 (in Thai). Nonthaburi: King Pradjadhipok's Institute.
[8] Siamwalla, A., Nikomborirak, D., Winitchaboot, S., Jitmanchaitham, R., Cheewasitthiyanon, S., and Naewmalee, K. (2003). Politics and interests under the Constitution of 1997 (in Thai). Nonthaburi: King Pradjadhipok's Institute.
[9] Chuengsatiansup, K. (2003). Power and corruption: Decoding bureaucratic culture in public health administration (in Thai). Bangkok: Amarin, p. 50.
[10] Pongsapich, A., and Kuwinpant, P. (Eds.). (2002). Patronage system (3rd ed.) (in Thai). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.
[11] Justice, J. (1989). Policies, plan, and people: Foreign aid and health development. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[12] Office of the Consumer Protection Board. (2007, August 1). Vision and missions. (Online). Available: vision.asp
[13] Rabibhadana, A., M.R. (Lecturer). (March 9, 2005). Patronage system and social development: A changing dimension in Thai society (in Thai). Bangkok: Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University.
[14] Tunsiri, V. (2004). Political culture and reforms (2nd ed.) (in Thai). Bangkok: Sukhum Lae Boot.
[15] Neher, C. D. (Ed.). (1981). Modern Thai politics: From village to nation. Cambridge: Schenkman.
[16] Embree, J. F. (1950). Thailand: A loosely structured social system. American Anthropologist, 52(2), 181-193.
[17] Dhiravegin, L. (2006). Thai politics (7th ed.) (in Thai). Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.
[18] Studwell, J. (2007). Asian godfathers: Money and power in Hong Kong and Southeast Asia. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, p. 152.
[19] Phongpaichit, P., and Baker, C. (2004). Thaksin: The business of politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, p. 53.
[20] Chiangkul, W. (2006). Government economic policy and conflict of interest problem (in Thai). Nonthaburi: King Pradjadhipok's Institute.
[21] Suphawong, Ch., and Kardkarnklai, Y. (Eds.). (1997). Civil society: Thai thinkers- attitudes (in Thai). Bangkok: Matichon.
[22] Samutwanit, Ch. (1992). 100 years of bureaucratic reform: Evolution of state power and political power
[in Thai]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
[23] Munger, F. (2007). Constitutional reform, legal consciousness, and citizen participation in Thailand. Cornell International Law Journal, 40(2), 455-475.
[24] Arphagaro, S. (Op-oon). (2004). Network: Nature, knowledge and management (in Thai). Bangkok: Learning Promotion Program for Community to Happiness.
[25] Archavanitkul, K., Poungsomlee, A., Jarusomboon, W., and Chansomwong, A. (1999). Introduction: Thai civil society: The making of Thai citizens. In A. Poungsomlee and K. Archavanitkul (Eds.), Thai civil society: The making of Thai citizens (pp. xxvii-lviii). Bangkok: Amarin Printing & Publishing.
[26] Chuengsatiansup, K. (2005). Deliberative action: Civil society and health systems reform in Thailand. Nonthaburi: Society and Health Institute.
[27] Eawsriwong, N. (2004). Reading: Thai political culture (in Thai). Bangkok: Matichon.
[28] Noiheet, S. (2007, November 11). Civil society and democratic development in the context of Thai society. (Online). Available:
[29] Laothamatas, A. (1999). Civil society in a western perspective: Reading and teaching at John Hopkins (in Thai). Bangkok: Civicnet Institute.
[30] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
[31] Brugha, R., and Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 239-246.
[32] Schmeer, K. (2000). Stakeholder analysis guideline. In S. Scribner and D. Brinkerhoff (Eds.), Policy toolkit for strengthening health sector reform (pp. 2:1-43). Bethesda: Abt Associates.
[33] Grimble, R., Chan, M. K., Aglionby, J., and Quan, J. (1995). Trees and trade-offs: A stakeholder approach to natural resource management. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
[34] International Institute for Environment and Development. (2005, March 4). Stakeholder power analysis, p. 6. (Online). Available: www.policypowertools. org/Tools/Understanding/docs/stakeholder_power_tool_engl ish.pdf
[35] Tungsiripat, R., and Tangcharoensathien, V. (2003). Stakeholder analysis (in Thai). Journal of Health Science, 12(6), 865-875.
[36] Allen, W., and Kilvington, M. (2001, September 24,). Stakeholder analysis. (Online). Available:
[37] Reich, M. R. (1995). The politics of health sector reform in developing countries: Three cases of pharmaceutical policy. Health Policy, 32(1-3), 45-77.
[38] Scribner, S., and Brinkerhoff, D. (2000). Section 1: Introduction to the toolkit and the policy process. In S. Scribner and D. Brinkerhoff (Eds.), Policy toolkit for strengthening health sector reform (pp. 1:1-8). Bethesda: Abt Associates.
[39] Flagestad, A., and Hope, C. A. (2004, June 23). Stakeholders in a winter sports destination: Identification and prioritization. (Online). Available: s/2004/Booklet_04=21.pdf
[40] Chevalier, J. (2001). Stakeholder analysis and natural resource management. Ottawa: Carleton University, p. 9.
[41] Tungsiripat, R., and Tangcharoensathien, V. (2003). Regulation of organ transplantation in Thailand: Does it work. Nonthaburi: International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, p. 13.
[42] Buanes, A., Jentoft, S., Karlsen, G. R., Maurstad, A., and Soreng, S. (2004). In whose interests? An exploratory analysis of stakeholders in Norwegian coastal zone planning. Ocean & Coastal Management, 47(3), 207-223.
[43] Mills, A., Brugha, R., Hanson, K., and McPake, B. (2002, November 4). Approaches for improving service delivery in the non state sector: what is the evidence on what works, where and why? (Online). Available: setalWDR.pdf
[44] Walt, G. (2001). Health policy: An introduction to process and power. London: Zed Books.
[45] Vivanichakul, N., and Udomsri, C. (1990). Business research method discipline. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
[46] Lertpaithoon, S. (1999). Civic movement: Legal and policy implication. In A. Poungsomlee and K. Archavanitkul (Eds.), Thai civil society: The making of Thai citizens (pp. 211-232) (in Thai). Bangkok: Amarin Printing & Publishing.
[47] Klausner, W. J. (2002). Thai culture in transition (4th ed.). Bangkok: Amarin Printing & Publishing.
[48] Hermans, L. M., and Thissen, W. A. H. (2008, April 4). Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts. (Online). Available: