Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30234
The Effect of Ambient Occlusion Shading on Perception of Sign Language Animations

Authors: Nicoletta Adamo-Villani, Joe Kasenga, Tiffany Jen, Bryan Colbourn

Abstract:

The goal of the study reported in the paper was to determine whether Ambient Occlusion Shading (AOS) has a significant effect on users' perception of American Sign Language (ASL) finger spelling animations. Seventy-one (71) subjects participated in the study; all subjects were fluent in ASL. The participants were asked to watch forty (40) sign language animation clips representing twenty (20) finger spelled words. Twenty (20) clips did not show ambient occlusion, whereas the other twenty (20) were rendered using ambient occlusion shading. After viewing each animation, subjects were asked to type the word being finger-spelled and rate its legibility. Findings show that the presence of AOS had a significant effect on the subjects perception of the signed words. Subjects were able to recognize the animated words rendered with AOS with higher level of accuracy, and the legibility ratings of the animations showing AOS were consistently higher across subjects.

Keywords: Animation, Deaf education, Sign Language, Ambient Occlusion Shading

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1081241

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1346

References:


[1] Burgstahler, S. (1994). Increasing the representation of people with disabilities in science. Journal of Information Technology and Disability 24(4).
[2] GRI Demographics (2007). Available at: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/Demographics/
[3] Wilbur, R. B. (2000). The use of ASL to support the development of English and literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5: 81- 104.
[4] Hoffmeister, R. (2000). A piece of the puzzle: ASL and reading comprehension in deaf children. In C. Chamberlain, J. P. Morford, & R. I. Mayberry (eds.), Language acquisition by eye, pp. 143-164. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[5] Elliott, R., Glauert, JRW, Kennaway, JR, Marshall, I (2000). The Development of Language Processing Support for the ViSiCAST Project. Proc. of ASSETS 2000, pp. 101-108.
[6] Vcom3D. Available at: http://www.vcom3d.com/
[7] TERC. Available at: http://www.terc.edu/
[8] eSIGN. Available at: http://www.visicast.cmp.uea.ac.uk/eSIGN/index.html
[9] Sims, E. (2000). SigningAvatars. Final Report for SBIR Phase II Project, U.S. Department of Education.
[10] Vesel, J. 2005. Signing Science. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32 (8): 30-31.
[11] Signing Science (2007). Available at: http://signsci.terc.edu/
[12] Adamo-Villani, N., Wilbur, R. (2008). Two Novel Technologies for Accessible Math and Science Education. IEEE Multimedia ¶Çé▒ Special Issue on Accessibility, October -December 2008, pp. 38-46.
[13] Adamo-Villani, N., Wilbur, R. (2010). Software for Math and Science Education for the Deaf. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 115-124.
[14] Gaitatzes, A., Yiorgos C., and Papaioannou, G. (2008). "Presampled Visibility for Ambient Occlusion." Computer Graphics Group. Retrieved 5 Nov. 2009 from: graphics.cs.aueb.gr/graphics/docs/papers/PreseampledVisibilityforAmbi entOcclusionWSCG2008.pdf.
[15] Tarini, Marco. (2006). Ambient Occlusion and Edge Cueing to Enhance Real Time Molecular Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 12, No. 5. Retrieved from Tarini_FinalVersionElec.pdf.
[16] Mendez-Feliu, A., Sbert, M. (2009). From obscurances to ambient occlusion: A survey. Visual Computer (2009) 25, pp. 181¶Çé▒196.
[17] Flodin, M. (1994). Signing Illustrated: The Complete Learning Guide. Berkley Publishing Group.
[18] Battison, R. (1978). Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD. Linstok Press.
[19] Kantowitz, B.H., Roediger, H.L., Elmes, D.G. (2009). Experimental Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
[20] Adamo-Villani, N. (2008). 3D rendering of American Sign Language finger-spelling: a comparative study of two animation techniques. Proc. of ICCIT 2008 - 5th International Conference on Computer and Instructional Technologies, 29-31 October 2008, Venice, Italy, Vol. 34, pp. 808- 812.
[21] Adamo-Villani, N., Wilbur, R., Eccarius, P., Abe-Harris, L. (2009). Effects of character geometric model on the perception of sign language animation. IEEE Proc. of IV09 -13th International Conference on Information Visualization, 14-17 July, Barcelona.