Learning Paradigms for Educating a New Generation of Computer Science Students

Authors: J. M. Breed, E. Taylor

Abstract:

In this paper challenges associated with a new generation of Computer Science students are examined. The mode of education in tertiary institutes has progressed slowly while the needs of students have changed rapidly in an increasingly technological world. The major learning paradigms and learning theories within these paradigms are studied to find a suitable strategy for educating modern students. These paradigms include Behaviourism, Constructivism, Humanism and Cogntivism. Social Learning theory and Elaboration theory are two theories that are further examined and a survey is done to determine how these strategies will be received by students. The results and findings are evaluated and indicate that students are fairly receptive to a method that incorporates both Social Learning theory and Elaboration theory, but that some aspects of all paradigms need to be implemented to create a balanced and effective strategy with technology as foundation.

Keywords: Computer Science, Education, Elaboration Theory, Learning Paradigms, Social Learning Theory.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1080746

References:

[1] A. K. Beerman, "Computer-based Multimedia: New Directions in Teaching and Learning." Department of Food Science and Nutrition, pp. 15-18, 28 June, 1996.
[2] D. Tapscott, Growing up digital: The rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
[3] D. G. Oblinger and J. L. Oblinger, Educating the Net Generation, Date of access: 28 February 2012. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf, 2005.
[4] M. Prensky, "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants" On The Horizon, vol. 9, no. 5, October, 2001.
[5] S. Bennett, K. Maton and L. Kervin, "The 'Digital Natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence." British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 39 no. 5, 2008.
[6] G. E. Kennedy, T. S. Judd, A. Churchward and K. Gray, "First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives?" Australian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp.108- 122, 2008.
[7] J. B. Caruso and G. Salaway, The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, EDUCAUSE, 2008.
[8] H. Thinyane, "Are digital natives a world-wide phenomenon? An Investigation into South African Students' use and experience with technology." Computers & Education, vol. 55, pp. 406-414, 2010.
[9] T. Kramlinger and T. Huberty, "Behaviorism Versus Humanism" , pp. 41-45. December 1990.
[10] N. Friessen, "Mind and Machine: Eithical and epistemological implications for research." AI & Society, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 83 - 92, 9 December 2009.
[11] B. F. Skinner, The Technology of Teaching, New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts, 1968.
[12] B. F. Skinner, "Teaching Machines." Science, pp. 969-977, 1958.
[13] C. Guey, Y. Chengand S. Shibata, "A Triarchal instruction model: integration of principles from Behaviorism, Cognitivism and Humanism." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 105-118, 2010.
[14] H. L. Petri and M. Mishkin, "Behaviorism, Cognitivsm and the Neuropsychology of Memory." American Scientist, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 30-37, January-February 1994.
[15] J. C. Smith, Historical Foundations of Cognitive Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer, 1990.
[16] D. C. Leonard, Learning Theories A to Z. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2002.
[17] E. Von Glaserfeld, Ernst, "Constructivism in Education" in T. Husne and T. N. Postlethwaite, eds. The International Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 162-263, 1989.
[18] L. B. Resnick, Knowing, Learning and Instruction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989.
[19] D. N. Perkins, "Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They make a Marriage?" Education Technology, pp. 18-23, May 1991.
[20] V. Richardson, "Constructivist Pedagogy." Teachers College Record, vol. 105, no 9, pp.1623-1640, December 2003.
[21] S. Barab and K. Squire, "Design-Based Research: Putting a stake in the ground." The Journal of the learning sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2004.
[22] P. Cobb, J. Confrey, A. Disessa, R. Lehrer, and L. Schauble, "Design Experiments in Educational Research." Educational Researcher, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 9-13, Jan/Feb 2003.
[23] A. Collins, D. Joseph and K. Bielaczyc, "Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues." The Journal of the learning sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15-42, 2004.
[24] A. Collins, "Towards a design science of education." in E. Scanlon, and T. O'Shea, eds. New directions in educational technology, Berlin: Springer. pp. 15-22, 1992.
[25] W. Huitt, Humanism and open education. Date of access: 8 August 2012. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/affect/humed.html, 2009.
[26] N. Gage, and D. Berliner, Educational Psychology. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1991.
[27] G. R. Taylor, Practical application of Social Learning theories in educating young African-American Males. Lanham: University Press of America, 2003.
[28] A. Bandura, "Social Cognitive theory." in R. Vasta, ed. Annals of child development, Greenwich: JAI Press, vol. 6, pp. 1-60, 1989.
[29] A. Bandura, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, 1986.
[30] R. Wood and A. Bandura, "Social Cognitive Theory of organizational Management." The Academy of Management review, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 361-384, July 1989.
[31] A. Bandura, "Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action." in W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gerwitz, eds. Handbook of moral behaviour and development, Hillsdale: Erlbaum, vol. 1, pp. 45-103 1991.
[32] C. M. Reigeluth, Instructional-Design Theories and models. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
[33] G. Morrison, S. Ross, E. Kemp and H. Kalman, Designing Effective Instruction. Chennai: Wiley and Sons, 2004.
[34] R. Mayer, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[35] D. A. Norman, Things that makes us smart: Defending Human attributes in the age of the machine. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1993
[36] C. C. Schroeder, "New Students - New Learning Styles." Change, pp. 21-26, September/October 1993.