Usability and Affordances: Examinations of Object-Naming and Object-Task Performance in Haptic Interfaces

Authors: Mia Sorensen

Abstract:

The introduction of haptic elements in a graphic user interfaces are becoming more widespread. Since haptics are being introduced rapidly into computational tools, investigating how these models affect Human-Computer Interaction would help define how to integrate and model new modes of interaction. The interest of this paper is to discuss and investigate the issues surrounding Haptic and Graphic User Interface designs (GUI) as separate systems, as well as understand how these work in tandem. The development of these systems is explored from a psychological perspective, based on how usability is addressed through learning and affordances, defined by J.J. Gibson. Haptic design can be a powerful tool, aiding in intuitive learning. The problems discussed within the text is how can haptic interfaces be integrated within a GUI without the sense of frivolity. Juxtaposing haptics and Graphic user interfaces has issues of motivation; GUI tends to have a performatory process, while Haptic Interfaces use affordances to learn tool use. In a deeper view, it is noted that two modes of perception, foveal and ambient, dictate perception. These two modes were once thought to work in tandem, however it has been discovered that these processes work independently from each other. Foveal modes interpret orientation is space which provide for posture, locomotion, and motor skills with variations of the sensory information, which instructs perceptions of object-task performance. It is contended, here, that object-task performance is a key element in the use of Haptic Interfaces because exploratory learning uses affordances in order to use an object, without meditating an experience cognitively. It is a direct experience that, through iteration, can lead to skill-sets. It is also indicated that object-task performance will not work as efficiently without the use of exploratory or kinesthetic learning practices. Therefore, object-task performance is not as congruently explored in GUI than it is practiced in Haptic interfaces.

Keywords: Affordances, Graphic User Interface, HapticInterfaces, Tool-Use, Object-Naming, Object-Task Performance

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1054976

References:

[1] Greeno, J. 1991, Number Sense as Situated Knowing in a Conceptual Domain, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 170-218
[2] Harré, R. 1999, "Nagel"s Challenge and the Mind-Body Problem", Philosophy, Vol. 74, No. 288, pp. 247-270.
[3] Greeno, J. 1991, Ibid.
[4] Hodges, J., Spatt, J., Patterson, K. 1999, What and How: Evidence for the Dissociation of Object Knowledge and Mechanical Problem-Solving Skills in the Human Brain, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 96, No. 16, pp. 9444- 9448
[5] Liebowitz, H.W., & Post, R.B. 1982, The Two Modes of Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
[6] Neisser, U. 1989, Direct Perception and Recognition as Distinct Perceptual System, Cognitive Science Society, August, 1989, Ann Arbor, Michigan
[7] Greeno, J. 1991, Ibid..
[8] Krippendorff, K 1989, On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That Design is Making Sense, Design Issues, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 9-39
[9] Norman, D. 2005. Human-Centered Design Considered Harmful. In Interactions, 12. 4, (July + August, 2005), 14-19. M. Young, The Techincal Writers Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.
[10] Greeno, J. 1991, Ibid..
[11] Adolph, K., Eppler, M., Gibson, E. 1993, "Crawling versus Walking Infants" Perception of Affordances for Locomotion over Sloping Surfaces", Child Development, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 1158-1174.
[12] Adolph, K., Eppler, M., Gibson, E. 1993, Ibid.
[13] Lockman, J. 2000, A Perception-Action Perspective on Tool Use Development, Child Development, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 137-144
[14] Lockman, J. 2000, Ibid.
[15] Zebrowitz, L. 2002, The Affordances of Immersive Virtual Environment Technology for Studying Social Affordances, Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 143-145
[16] Zebrowitz, L. 2002, Ibid.
[17] Adolph, K., Eppler, M., Gibson, E. 1993, Ibid.
[18] Krippendorf, K 1989, Ibid.
[19] Sorensen, M. 2009, Making a Case for Biological and Tangible Interfaces, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Physicality, September, 2009, Human Computer Interaction, Cambridge, UK, 2-6.
[20] Djajadingrat, T., Wensveen, S. Frens, J., Overbeek, K. 2004. Tangible Products: redressing the balance between appearance and action. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing vol. 8, no. 5, 294-309.
[21] Momo (web video), 2007, USA, Vimeo
[22] Wang, C., O'Friel, K. 2007, Momo: A Haptic Navigation Device
[online], 1, Available from: http://www.momobots.com (Accessed: 12.1.2010).
[23] Hansell, S. 2007, Object-Oriented Objects at N.Y.U (online), New York Times, 1, Available from: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/18/object-oriented-objects-at-nyu/
[Accessed: 12.1.2010]
[24] Morowati, T., Wright, J., Lotan, G., Croft, C. 2005, Pulse Presence
[online], ITP Winter Show, 2005, 1, Available from: http://itp.nyu.edu/show/winter2005/detail.php? project_id=467
[Accessed: 12.1.2010]
[25] Morowati, T., Wright, J., Lotan, G., Croft, C. 2005, Pulse Presence
[online], Pulse Wall, 1, Available from: http://itp.nyu.edu/~rcc273/pcomp/pulse/ (Accessed: 12.1.2010)
[26] Cassinelli, A., Reynolds, C. and Ishikawa, M. 2006, Meta Perception: Human Interface (online), Ishikawa Komuro Laboratory, 1, Available from: http://www.k2.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ perception/HapticRadar/indexe. html (Accessed: 12.1.2010)
[27] Cassinelli, A., Reynolds, C. and Ishikawa, M. 2006, Ibid.
[28] Koffka, K. 1935, Principles of Gestalt Psychology, Routledge, London, UK
[29] Melanson, D. 2009, Apple Patent Applications Offer Glimpse of Haptic Screens, RFID Readers, Fingerprint ID (online), Engadget, 1, Available from: http://labs.nortd.com/ touchkit/ (Accessed: 12.1.2010)
[30] Sorensen, M. 2009, Ibid.