Characteristics of Wall Thickness Increase in Pipe Reduction Process using Planetary Rolls

Authors: Yuji Kotani, Shunsuke Kanai, Hisaki Watari

Abstract:

In recent years, global warming has become a worldwide problem. The reduction of carbon dioxide emissions is a top priority for many companies in the manufacturing industry. In the automobile industry as well, the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions is one of the most important issues. Technology to reduce the weight of automotive parts improves the fuel economy of automobiles, and is an important technology for reducing carbon dioxide. Also, even if this weight reduction technology is applied to electric automobiles rather than gasoline automobiles, reducing energy consumption remains an important issue. Plastic processing of hollow pipes is one important technology for realizing the weight reduction of automotive parts. Ohashi et al. [1],[2] present an example of research on pipe formation in which a process was carried out to enlarge a pipe diameter using a lost core, achieving the suppression of wall thickness reduction and greater pipe expansion than hydroforming. In this study, we investigated a method to increase the wall thickness of a pipe through pipe compression using planetary rolls. The establishment of a technology whereby the wall thickness of a pipe can be controlled without buckling the pipe is an important technology for the weight reduction of products. Using the finite element analysis method, we predicted that it would be possible to increase the compression of an aluminum pipe with a 3mm wall thickness by approximately 20%, and wall thickness by approximately 20% by pressing the hollow pipe with planetary rolls.

Keywords: Pipe-Forming, Wall Thickness, Finite-element-method

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1080352

References:

[1] T.Ohashi, K.Hayashi, Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol.138 (2003) 560-563.
[2] T. Ohashi, K.Matsui, Y.Saotome, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.113 (2001) 98-102.
[3] Takuo Nagamachi, Onoda Yoshitomi, Kimura Sadao, Kitawaki Takeo, Materials Transactions, Vol.45, No.4 (2004) 1328-1334.
[4] A. Shirayori, S. Fuchizawa, H. Ishigure, M. Narazaki, Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol.139 (2003) 58-63.
[5] Manabu KIUCHI, Ken SHINTANI, Joaunal of JSTP Vol.38 no.433(1997-2) 177-182.
[6] Yuji Kotani, Hisaki Watari and Akihiko Watanabe, Advanced Materials Research Vol. 320 (2011) 456-461.