Ecolabeling and Green Certification for Effective Fisheries Management – An Analysis

Authors: A. Ramachandran

Abstract:

Nowadays there is a growing environmental concern and the business communities have slowly started recognising environmental protection and sustainable utilization of natural resources into their marketing strategies. This paper discusses the various Ecolabeling and Certification Systems developed world over to regulate and introduce Fair Trade in Ornamental Fish Industry. Ecolabeling and green certification are considered as part of these strategies implemented partly out of compulsion from the National and International Regulatory Bodies and Environmental Movements. All the major markets of ornamental fishes like European Union, USA and Japan have started putting restrictions on the trade to impose ecolabeling as a non tariff barrier like the one imposed on seafood and aqua cultured products. A review was done on the available Ecolabeling and Green Certification Schemes available at local, national and international levels for fisheries including aquaculture and ornamental fish trade and to examine the success and constraints faced by these schemes during its implementation. The primary downside of certification is the multiplicity of ecolabels and cost incurred by applicants for certification, costs which may in turn be passed on to consumers. The studies reveal serious inadequacies in a number of ecolabels and cast doubt on their overall contribution to effective fisheries management and sustainability. The paper also discusses the inititive taken in India to develop guidelines for Green Certification of Fresh water ornamental fishes.

Keywords: Ecolabeling in fisheries, Fair trade, Green Certification, Sustainable Ornamental fish trade.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1080302

References:

[1] Deere, Carolyn L. Eco-labeling and Sustainable Fisheries, IUCN: Washington, D.C and FAO: Rome, 1999.
[2] Teisl, M.F., Roe, B. and Hicks, R.L. Can Eco-labels Tune a Market? Evidence rom Dolphin-Safe Labeling, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002, 43, 339-359.
[3] Brown, J. An account of the dolphin-safe tuna issue in the UK, Marine Policy, 2005, 29, 39-46.
[4] Wynne, R.D.) The emperor-s new eco-logos ?: a critical review of the Scientific Certification Systems environmental report card and the Green Seal certification mark programs. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 1994, 14: 51- 149.
[5] Macfadyen, G. & Huntington, T. Certification and Sustainable Fisheries. Poseidon/United Nations Environment Program, 2008, 91p.
[6] Wessells, C.R.; Cochrane, K.; Deere, C.; Wallis, P.; Willmann, R. 2001. Product certification and ecolabeling for fisheries sustainability. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 422. Rome, FAO. 2001. 83p
[7] Anon. 2009. Elements, News letter of Singapore Environmental Council, Issue No. 1 of 2009, pp. 3-11
[8] Poulain, F. Recent Trends in Environmental Labeling and Certification in Fisheries, Forestry and Organic Agriculture. Information Paper prepared for the Expert Consultation on the development of International Guidelines for Eco-labeling of Fish and Fish Products from Marine Capture Fisheries, October, Rome Italy, 2003, 14-17, 32 pp.
[9] ISO.Guide 62, General Requirements for bodies operating assessment and certification/registration of quality systems, International Organization for Standards, Geneva, Switzerland, 1996.
[10] FAO. The State Of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, 2006, FAO. Rome, 2007.162 p.
[11] UNCED. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 3-14 June, Rio de Janeiro, 1992.
[12] FAO. Committee on Fisheries, Sub-Committee on Fish Trade: Outcome of Expert Consultation on Eco-labeling. Ninth Session, February 2004, Germany, FAO, Rome, 2004, 4 p
[13] FAO. Guidelines for the Ecolabeling of Fish and Fishery Products from Marine Capture Fisheries, FAO, Rome, 2005, 90p.
[14] FAO. Report of the Technical Consultation on the Feasibility of Developing Non-Discriminatory Technical Guidelines for Eco- Labeling of Products from Marine Capture Fisheries, Rome, Italy, 21- 23 October FAO Fisheries Report No.594. 1998.
[15] Potts, T. & Haward, M. International Trade, Ecolabeling, and Sustainable Fisheries - recent issues, Concepts and Practices, Environment, Development and Sustainability 2007, 9: 91-106.
[16] Birnie, P.W. and Boyle, A. Basic Documents on International Law and the Environment, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995, 375 p.
[17] IISD. Global Green Standards: ISO 14000 and Sustainable Development Winnipeg, International Institute for Sustainable Development, 1996, 100 p.
[18] Roheim, C.A. and J. Sutinen. "Trade and Marketplace Measures to Promote Sustainable Fishing Practices," ICTSD Natural Resources, International Trade and Sustainable Development Series Issue Paper No. 3, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and the High Seas Task Force, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
[19] Staffin, Elliot... "Trade Barrier or Boon? A Critical Evaluation of Environmental Labeling and its Role in the ÔÇÿGreening- of World Trade." Columbia Journal of International Environmental Law, 1996, 21:205-286.
[20] UNCTAD/FIELD. Legal and Policy Issues in the Market Access Implications of Labeling for Environmental Purposes, Project on Building Capacity for Improved Policy Making and Negotiation on Key Trade and Environment Issues, Sub Regional Brain Storming Workshop on Trade and Environment Issues Contained in the Paragraphs 31 and 32 of the WTO Doha Ministerial Declaration, UNCTAD/FIELD, 30th July to 1st August, Bangkok, 2003, 24 p.
[21] Phillips B., Ward T., Chaffee C. Eco-labeling in Fisheries: What Is It All About? Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2003.
[22] MSC. Marine Stewardship Council Annual Report-2007-08, London, U.K., 2008, 28 p.
[23] Lunn, K.E. & Moreau, M.A. Unmonitored trade in marine ornamental fishes: the case of Indonesia-s Banggai cardinal fish (Pterapogon kauderni), Coral Reefs, 2004, 23 (3) 344-351.
[24] Alencastro,A.L., Degner,R.L and. Larkin,S.L. Hobbyists- preferences for marine ornamental fish: A discrete choice analysis of ecolabeling and selected product attributes SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin #15, 2005, pp.19-22.
[25] MAC. Marine Aquarium Council Member-s report on activities to ICRI, International Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI) General Meeting, Tokyo, Japan, April 23rd-24th, 2007, 9 p.
[26] Chao, N, L., Petry, P., Sonneschien, L, Tlusty, M. Conservation and Management of Ornamental Fish Resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, Brazil. (Project Piaba, Bio-Amazonia Conservation International, 1295 William St.Baltimore, 1230-1800 USA, 2001, 250 p.
[27] FAO. Ornamental fishing in Latin America - Status, Trends and Challenges Ahead, Commission for Inland Fisheries of Latin America, Eleventh Session, FAO, , 1-4, September, Manaus, Brazil, 2009.
[28] Chao, N.L & Prang,G. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation, Vol. 1 (2), 1997, pp. 105-111.
[29] Prang, G. Aviemento and the ornamental fishery of the Rio Negro Brazil: Implications of sustainable resources use. In: Chao, NL, Petry, P, Prang, G, Sonneschien, L and Tlusty, M (Eds) (2001). Conservation and management of ornamental fish resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, Brazil. Edua, Manaus. 2001, 302pp
[30] Schaefer, A. S. Conservation and Management of Ornamental Fish Resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, BrazilÔÇöProject Piaba, Copeia, 2003, (3):672-675.
[31] OATA. Genetically Modified Ornamental fish: "an unwelcome addition to the Market place", http://www.ornamentalfish.org/index.php, Ornamental Aquatic Trade Association, Westbury, 2010.
[32] Silas,EG, Ramachandran, A. et al. Report of the Task Force on Guidelines for Green Certification of Ornamental Fish, as the Member of the National Task Force of Marine Products Export Development Authority, Ministry of Commerce, Government of India, 2010, 86 p.
[33] Ramachandran, A. Scanning of Ornamental Fish Marketing Environment and Development of Strategies for expansion and diversification of markets, paper presented in the International workshop on Green Certification of Ornamental Fish, 14th to 18th October, organized Marine Products Export Development Authority, project PIABA, Brazil and UNCTAD , Kochi, India, 2008.
[34] Ramachandran, A. Market Enhancement and Value Addition of Ornamental Fishes through proper Market Mix Strategies and Certification, In: Kurup et al (Eds.), Ornamentals Kerala 2010 Souvenir Government of Kerala and Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Cochin, India, 2010, pp.83-92.
[35] Ramachandran, A. An overview of the significance of Ecolabeling and Green Certification in Ornamental Fish Trade, Paper presented in the International Seminar on Ornamental Fish Breeding, Farming and Trade, organized by Government of Kerala and Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, 13-15th February Cochin, India, 2010.
[36] Baum├╝ller,H. Fisheries - Environmental impacts of trade liberalization, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2007, 5 p.
[37] Wessells, C.R., Johnston, R.J. & Donath, H. Assessing consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood: the influence of species, certifier, and household attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999, 81: 1084-1089.
[38] Hall, K.C. & Bellwood, D.R. Histological effects of cyanide, stress, and starvation on the intestinal mucosa of Pomacentrus coelestis, a marine aquarium fish species. Journal of Fish Biology, 1995, 47: 438- 454.
[39] UNEP,http://www.unep.ch/ETB/publications/Ecolabelpap141005f.pdf- 22-2-2010).
[40] Suwanrangsi, S. "Experiences in the Application of HACCP for Export and Local Markets: The case of Thai Fisheries," in E. Hanak, E. Boutrif, P. Fabre and M. Pineiro (eds.), Food Safety Management in Developing Countries. Proceedings of the International Workshop, CIRAD-FAO, December 11-13, 2000, Montpellier, France, CIRADFAO. CIRAD CD-ROM,Montpellier, France, 2002.
[41] Pongthanapanich, T. and E. Roth. "Toward Environmental Responsibility of Thai Shrimp Farming through a Voluntary Management Scheme," IME Working Paper 70/06, Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark, 2006.
[42] (Potts, T & Haward, M. International Trade, Eco-labeling and Sustainable-Recent Issues, Concepts AND Practices, Environment, Development and Sustainability Jl., 2007, 9 (1), 91-106.
[43] Rhodes, S.P. Analysis of Blue Angel environmental seal-of-approval criteria for workstation Computers The IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, ISEE; Orlando, FL; USA; 01-03 May, 1995, pp. 295-300.
[44] Bjerner,M., Boonyaratapalin,M., Mungkung,R and Wennberg,N. Study on Eco-labeling of Aquatic Products: General view and future considerations for the ASEAN region, Regional Technical Consultation on International Fish Trade Related Issues Bangkok, Thailand, 20-22 February, 2006, 21 p.
[45] Brécard, D., Hlaimi, B., Sterenn Lucas, S., Perraudeau, Y., and Salladarré, F. Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe, Ecological Economics, 2009, 69 (1), pp. 115-125.
[46] Lunn, K.E. & Moreau, M.A. Unmonitored trade in marine ornamental fishes: the case of Indonesia-s Banggai cardinal fish (Pterapogon kauderni), Coral Reefs, 2004, 23 (3), 344-351.
[47] Anon MAC Certified chain of custody from reef to retail becomes reality, SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin #11, 2003, p. 56.
[48] Alencastro, L.A. Hobbyists- preferences for marine ornamental fish: discrete choice analysis of source, price, guarantee and ecolabeling attributes. Unpublished Master of Science thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 2004, 110 p.
[49] Gardiner, P.R. & Viswanathan, K.K Ecolabeling and fisheries management, Vol. 27, World Fish Centre, Penang, Malaysia, 2004.
[50] Ramachandran, A. Acts, Legislations and Fishing Rights - Impact on the Development of Ornamental Fish Industry in India, paper presented in the International workshop on Green Certification of Ornamental Fish, 14th to 18th October, organized Marine Products Export Development Authority, project PIABA, Brazil and UNCTAD , Kochi, India. 2008.