Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32716
The Results of the Fetal Weight Estimation of the Infants Delivered in the Delivery Room At Dan Khunthot Hospital by Johnson-s Method

Authors: Nareelux Suwannobol, JintanaTapin, Khuanchanok Narachan

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy to estimation fetal weight by Johnson-s method and compares it with actual birth weight. The sample group was 126 infants delivered in Dan KhunThot hospital from January March 2012. Fetal weight was estimated by measuring fundal height according to Johnson-s method. The information was collected by studying historical delivery records and then analyzed by using the statistics of frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Finally, the difference was analyzed by a paired t-test.The results showed had an average birth weight was 3093.57 ± 391.03 g (mean ± SD) and 3,455 ± 454.55 g average estimated fetal weight by Johnson-s method higher than average actual birth weight was 384.09 grams. When classifying the infants according to birth weight found that low birth weight (<2500 g) and the appropriate birth weight (2500-3999g) actual birth weight less than estimate fetal weight . But the high birth weight (> 4000 g) actual birth weight was more than estimated fetal weight. The difference was found between actual birth weight and estimation fetal weight of the minimum weight in high birth weight ( > 4000 g) , the appropriate birth weight (2500-3999g) and low birth weight (<2500 g) respectively. The rate of estimates fetal weight within 10% of actual birth weight was 35.7%. Actual birth weight were compared with the found that the difference is statistically significant (p <.000). Employing Johnson-s method to estimate fetal weight can estimate initial fetal weight before passing to special examinations, which may require excessive high cost. A variety of methods should be employed to estimate fetal weight more precisely, which will help plan care for mother-s and infant-s safety.

Keywords: Johnson's method, Fetal weight estimate, Delivery Room, Student nurse.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1079992

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2280

References:


[1] Cunningham, F.G.; McDonald, P.C.; Gant, N.F. 1993. Williams Obstetrics, 19th ed. Prentice-Hall Int., Norwalk, CT, USA.
[2] Kamudhamas A, Torudom P. The Ability of Medical Students in the Prediction of Birth Weight. Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology June. 2001, Vol. 13, No.2, pp.91-98.
[3] Altenfelder Mário de M. Clinical formulas, mother-s opinion and ultrasound in predicting birth weight. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008; 126(3):145-9
[4] Belete W, Gaym A. Clinical estimation of fetal weight in low resource settings: comparison of Johnson's formula and the palpation method. Ethiop Med J.2008Jan;46(1):37-46.
[5] Khani s et al. Comparison of abdominal palpation, Johnson's technique and ultrasound in the estimation of fetal weight in Northern Iran. Midwifery. 2011 Feb; Vol. 27 (1), pp. 99-1033.
[6] Numprasert, W. A study in Johnson-s Formula: Fundal Height Measurement for Estimation of Birth Weight. AU J. T. 2004; 8(1): 15- 20.