Impact of the Amendments of Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (2007) on Governance of GLCs and Performance
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Impact of the Amendments of Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (2007) on Governance of GLCs and Performance

Authors: Azmi Hamid, Rozainun Aziz


The study aims to investigate the impact on board and audit committee characteristics and firm performance before and after the revision of MCCG (2007) on GLCs over the period 2005-2010. We used Return on Assets (ROA) as a proxy for firm performance. The data consists of two groups; data collected before and after the amendments of MCCG (2007). Findings show that boards of directors with accounting / finance qualifications (BEXP) are statistically significant with performance for period before the amendments. As for audit committee members with accounting or finance qualifications (ACEXP), correlation results indicate a negative association and non-significant results for the years before amendments. However, the years after the amendments show positive relationship with highly significant correlations (1%) to ROA. This indicates that the amendments of MCCG 2007 on the audit committee members- literacy in accounting have impacted the governance structures and performance of GLCs.

Keywords: BOD and Audit Committees, firm performance, GLCs.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2546


[1] Treasury Circular, Ministry of Finance, Malaysia, 1993.
[2] Treasury Circular, Ministry of Finance, Malaysia, 1986.
[3] Mokhtar, A. 2005. The Malay Way of Business Change. Economist, 376(8480): 50.
[4] GLCs Transformation Manual, Putrajaya High Committee Group, Section I - IV, 2004.
[5] Malaysian Code Of Corporate Governance, Malaysian Law Journal Sdn Bhd, Malaysia, 2000.
[6] Auditor General Report, Malaysia, (2010)", Retrieved 8 September 2011,
[7] Mohamad Ariff, A., Ibrahim, M.K., & Othman, R.. Determinants of firm level governance: Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance, Vol.7, No.5, 2007, pp.562-573.
[8] Che Haat, M.H., Abdul Rahman, R., & Mahenthiran, S. Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian Companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol.23, No.8, 2008, pp.744-778.
[9] Abdul Wahab, E.A., How, J.C.Y., & Verhoeven, P. ,The Impact of the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance: Compliance, Institutional Investor and Stock Performance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, Vol.3, No.2, (2007). Pp106-129.
[10] Abdul Rahman, Rashidah, Mohammad, Noraini, Syed Ahmad and Syed Noh "How Independent are the Malaysia Independent Directors-,A Research Report at Institute Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam, (2007).
[11] Hamid., Azmi, Corporate Governance Structures of GLCs and NGLCs and Firm Performance, PhD Thesis, Exeter University, UK., 2008.
[12] Muhammad Sori, Z., Mohammad, S., Abdul Hamid, M.A.and Nassir, A., "The effectiveness of the audit committee: The Chairman Perception", Akauntan Nasional, February, (2001).
[13] Cadbury Committee, Report on the Financial Aspect of Corporate Governance, GEC, London, 1992.
[14] Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. "Theory of the fir: managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure", Journal of Financial Economic, Vol. 3 No. 3, 1976, pp. 305-60.
[15] Zahra, S.A. and Pearce, J.A. II "Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model", Journal of Management, Vol. 15 No. 2, 1989, pp. 229-308.
[16] David, L. and Charles, M.W, "Governance Structure, Size and Corporate Performance in UK Firms", Management Decision, Vol. 37, (1999), pp. 457-464.
[17] Rosenstein, S. and Wyatt, J.G. ,Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth, Journal of Financial Economic, Vol. 26, No.2, 1990, pp. 175-1.
[18] Chaganti, RS. Mahajan, V. and Sharma, S. "Corporate board size, composition and corporate failures in the retailing industry", Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 22, 1985, pp. 24-37.
[19] Rashidah, A.R. "Effective Corporate Governance", University Publication Center (UPENA), UiTM, (2007).
[20] Zubaidah, Z.A., Nurmala, M.K. and Jusoff, K. , Board Structure and Corporate Performace, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 1 No.1, 2009, pp. 150-164.
[21] Dehaene, A., De Vuyst, V. and Ooghe, H. , Corporate Performance and Board Structure in Belgian Companies, Long Range Planning, 34, 3, 2001, pp. 383-398.
[22] Dahya, J. and McConnell, J.J. Outside Directors and Corporate Board Decision, Journal of Corporate Finance, Article in Press, Corrected Proof, 2003
[23] Lee, Y.S., Rosenstein, S. and Wyatt, J.G., The Value of Financial Outside Directors on Corporate Boards, International Review of Economics and Finance, 8, 4, 1999, pp. 421-431.
[24] Agrawal, A. and Knoeber, C.R., "Firm performance and mechanism to control agenproblemsbetween managers and shareholders", Journal of Financial and Qualitative Analysis, Vol. 31 No. 3, 1996, pp. 337-97.
[25] Bhagat and Black, "Board independence and long term performance", working paper, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO., 1998.
[26] Public Oversight Board (POB). ,"In the Public Interest: A special Report by the Public Oversight Board of the SEC Practices Section", Stamford, CT: POB., 1993).
[27] Ruzaidah, R. and Takiah, M. I., the Effectiveness of Audit Committee in Monitoringthe Quality of Corporate Reporting, a Chapter in Corporate Governance: AnInternational Perspective. MICG Publication: 2004, pp154-175.
[28] Field, A., Discovering statistics; Using SPSS for windows, SAGE Publications, ISBN 0-7619-5754-5. 2001.
[29] Donaldson, L & Davis, JH, 'Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns', Australian Journal of Management, vol. 16, 1991, pp. 49-64.