Simulation of Organic Matter Variability on a Sugarbeet Field Using the Computer Based Geostatistical Methods
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Simulation of Organic Matter Variability on a Sugarbeet Field Using the Computer Based Geostatistical Methods

Authors: M. Rüstü Karaman, Tekin Susam, Fatih Er, Servet Yaprak, Osman Karkacıer


Computer based geostatistical methods can offer effective data analysis possibilities for agricultural areas by using vectorial data and their objective informations. These methods will help to detect the spatial changes on different locations of the large agricultural lands, which will lead to effective fertilization for optimal yield with reduced environmental pollution. In this study, topsoil (0-20 cm) and subsoil (20-40 cm) samples were taken from a sugar beet field by 20 x 20 m grids. Plant samples were also collected from the same plots. Some physical and chemical analyses for these samples were made by routine methods. According to derived variation coefficients, topsoil organic matter (OM) distribution was more than subsoil OM distribution. The highest C.V. value of 17.79% was found for topsoil OM. The data were analyzed comparatively according to kriging methods which are also used widely in geostatistic. Several interpolation methods (Ordinary,Simple and Universal) and semivariogram models (Spherical, Exponential and Gaussian) were tested in order to choose the suitable methods. Average standard deviations of values estimated by simple kriging interpolation method were less than average standard deviations (topsoil OM ± 0.48, N ± 0.37, subsoil OM ± 0.18) of measured values. The most suitable interpolation method was simple kriging method and exponantial semivariogram model for topsoil, whereas the best optimal interpolation method was simple kriging method and spherical semivariogram model for subsoil. The results also showed that these computer based geostatistical methods should be tested and calibrated for different experimental conditions and semivariogram models.

Keywords: Geostatistic, kriging, organic matter, sugarbeet.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1523


[1] D.C., Reicosky and M.J. Lindstrom. "Impact of fall tillage on short-term carbon dioxide flux," p. 177-187. In: R.Lal, J. Kimble, E. Levine, and B.A. Stewards (Eds.) Soils and Global Change. Lewis Publisher, Chelsea, Michigan, 1995.
[2] H. DeCourt, P.L. Darius and J.D. Baerdemaeker. "The spatial variability of topsoil fertility in two Belgian Fields," Computers and Electronics in Agr., Vol: 14, 1996, pp 179-196.
[3] E.J. Sadler, W.J. Busscher, P.J. Bauer and D.J. Karlen. "Spatial scale requirements for precision farming: A case study in the southeastern,". Agronomy Journal, Vol: 90, 1998, pp. 191-197.
[4] C. Okano, A. Nishimune, M. Fukuhara, K. Okamoto and M. Hayasaka, "Sugarbeet nutritional diagnosis using remote sensing," In T. Ando et al., (ed) Plant nutrition for sustainable food production and environment. Kluwer Acad. Publishing, Tokyo, 1997.
[5] S.M. Eltaib, M.S.amin, m.M. Hanafi, A.R.Shariff and A. Wayayok "Spatial variability of N, P and K in rice field in Sawah sempadan, Malaysia" Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., Vol:24, 2002, pp. 321-328.
[6] B.B. Trangmar, R.S. Yost and G. Uehara, "Aplication of Geostatistics to spatial Studies of Soil Properties," Advances in Agronomy, Vol.38, 1985, pp. 45-93.
[7] D. Mallants, P.M. Binayak, J. Diederik and J. Feyen, "Spatial Variability of Hydraulic Properties in a Multi-Layered Soil Profile," Soil Science, Vol:161, 1996, pp.167-180.
[8] E.H. Ishaaks and R.M. Sriwastawa, "An Introduction to Applied Jeostatistics," Oxford University Press. New York, 1989.
[9] R. Webster, "Quantitative Spatial Analysis of Soils in The Field," Advances in Soil Science, Vol:3, 1985, pp. 65-69.
[10] R. Sunila and K.Kollo, A comparison of geostatistics and fuzzy application for digital elevation model. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol: 34
[11] R. Webster and M. Oliver, Geostatistics for environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, U.K., 2001.
[12] ESRI, "Geostatiscial Analysis Module Hand Book," ESRI Inc. Publication, The Netherland, 2005.
[13] StatMost, "Dataxiom Software Inc. User-s Guide: StatMost," 5th Ed. Dataxiom Soft. Inc., LA., USA, 1995.
[14] S.R. Olsen, C.V. Cole, F.S. Watanable. and L.A. Dean, "Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate," Agricultural Handbook, U.S. Soil Dept. 939, Washington D.C., 1954.
[15] L.A. Richards, "Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils," USDA Agricultural Handbook, 60, Washington, D.C., 1954
[16] L.E. Allison and C.D. Moodie, "Carbonate, In: Methods of Soil Analysis," Part 2., Agronomy J., Vol:9, 1965, pp. 1379-1400.
[17] M.L. Jackson, "Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentica-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs", New Jersey, USA, 1958.
[18] A. Walkley, "A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and inorganic soil constituents," Soil Sci. Vol:63, 1947, pp. 251-263.
[19] H.D. Chapman and F.P. Pratt. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters, Univ. of California Div. Agr. Sci. USA, 1961.
[20] Kerry, R. and Oliver, M.A., 2007. Determining the effect of skewed data on the variogram. II. Outliers. Computers and Geosciences (Accepted for Publ.).
[21] M.R. Karaman, T. Susam, S. Yaprak and and F. Er. "Computer based geostatistical strategies in assessing of spatial variability of agricultural phosphorus on a sugarbeet field," IACSIT International Association of Computer Sci. and Information Technology, Proceedings of ICIME, 2009, pp. 201-205, Malaysia.