Effect of Wood Vinegar for Controlling on Housefly (Musca domestica L.)
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Effect of Wood Vinegar for Controlling on Housefly (Musca domestica L.)

Authors: U. Pangnakorn, S. Kanlaya, C. Kuntha

Abstract:

Raw wood vinegar was purified by both standing and filtering methods. Toxicity tests were conducted under laboratory conditions by the topical application method (contact poison) and feeding method (stomach poison). Larvicidal activities of wood vinegar at four different concentrations (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 %) were studied against second instar larvae of housefly (Musca domestica L.). Four replicates were maintained for all treatments and controls. Larval mortality was recorded up to 96 hours and compared with the larval survivability by two methods of larvicidal bioassay. Percent pupation and percent adult emergence were observed in treated M. domestica. The study revealed that the feeding method gave higher efficiency compared with the topical application method. Larval mortality increased with increasing concentration of wood vinegar and the duration of exposure. No mortality was found in treated M. domestica larvae at minimum 10% concentration of wood vinegar through the experiments. The treated larvae were maintained up to pupa and adult emergence. At 30% maximum concentration larval duration was extended to 11 days in M. domestica for topical application method and 9 days for feeding method. Similarly the pupal durations were also increased with increased concentrations (16 and 24 days for topical application method and feeding method respectively at 30% concentration) of the treatments.

Keywords: Housefly (Musca domestica L.), wood vinegar, mortality, topical application, feeding

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1054869

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3089

References:


[1] Armes, N.J., Jadhav, D.R., Bond, G.S. and A.B.S. King. 1992. Insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera in South India. Pesticide Science. 34:335-364.
[2] Alstein, M. Ahronson, N. and J.J. Menn. 1993. Overview:new targets for insect management in crop protection. Archive of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 22, 5-12.
[3] Apai W., Tongdeethare S. 2001. Wood vinegar the new organic compound for agriculture in Thailand. 4th Conference Toxicity Division, Department of Agriculture, pp 166-169.
[4] Clark, J. M., J. G. Scott, F. Campos, and J. R. Bloomquist. 1995. Resistance to avermectins: extent, mechanisms, and management implications. Annu. Rev. Entomol 40: 1-30.
[5] Gilbert, L.I. 1964. Physiology of growth and development. Endocrine aspects, pp.150-152. In M. Rockstein (Eds.). The Physiology of Insects, Vol.1. Academic Press, New York. Pp.640.
[6] Hummelbrunner, L.A. and M.B. Isman. 2001. Acute, sublethal, antifeedant, and synergistic effects of monoterpenoid essential oil compounds on the tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lep: Noctuidae). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 49, 715-720.
[7] Hoffmann, K.H.and M.W. Lorenz. 1998. Recent advances in hormones in insect pest control. Phytoparasitica.26,4,1-8.
[8] Iwasa, M., S. Makino, H. Asakura, H. Kobori, and Y. Morimoto. 1999. Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) at a cattle farm in Japan. J. Med. Entomol 36: 108-112.
[9] Leatemia, J.A. and M.B. Isman. 2004. Toxicity and antifeedant activity of Annona squamosa (Annonaceae) against lepidopteran pests and natural enemies. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 24, 150-158.
[10] Liu, N. and X. Yue. 2000. Insecticide resistance and cross-resistance in the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Econ. Entomol 93: 1269-1275.
[11] Liu, H., Chen, Y., Cui, G., Wu, Q. and J. He .2005.Regulating expressions of cyclin D1, pRb, and anti-cancer effects of deguelin on human Burkitt"s lymphoma Daudi cells in vitro. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 26:7, 873-880.
[12] Kristensen, M., J. B. Jespersen, and M. Knorr. 2004. Cross-resistance potential of fipronil in Musca domestica. Pest Manag. Sci 60: 894-900.
[13] Kumar, N.S., Murugan, K. and W. Zhang. 2007. Additive interaction of Helicoverpa armigera Nucleopolyhedrovirus and Azadirachtin. BioControl. (in press).
[14] Marçon, P. C., G. D. Thomas, B. D. Seigfried, J. B. Campbell, and S. R. Skoda. 2003. Resistance status of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from southeastern Nebraska beef cattle feedlots to selected insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol 96: 1016-1020.
[15] Mitchell, E. R., Tingle, F. C. and D. A. Carlson. 1975. Effect of muscalure on house fly traps of different color and location in poultry houses. J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 10: 168-174.
[16] Murugan, K., Sivaramakrishnan, S., Senthil Kumar, N., Jeyabalan, D. and S. Senthil Nathan. 1999. Potentiating effect of neem seed kernel extract and neem oil on nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) on Spodoptera litura Fab. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insect Science Applied. 19,229-235.
[17] Pangnakorn U. 2008. Utilization of Wood Vinegar By-product from Iwate kiln for Organic Agricultural System. Proceedings of Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Development Conference (TISD2008) The Sofitel Raja Orchid, Khon Kaen, Thailand, January 28-29,2008. Page 17-19.
[18] Panhwar, F. 2005. The Neem tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss), a natural pesticide practice in Pakistan. www. ChemLin.com.
[19] Sharma, A.K. and R. K. Seth. 2005. Combained effect of gamma radiation and Azadirachtin on the growth and development of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Current Science. 89, 1027-1031.
[20] Schmutterer, H. 1990. Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the Neem tree, Azadirachta indica. Annual Review of Entomology.35, 271-297.
[21] Singh, U., Wadhwani, A.M. and B.M. Johri. 1996. Dictionary of economic plants in India. Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi. According to Armes et al. (1992) larval mortality was recorded in the larvae after 96 h.
[22] Yoshimura, H. and Hayakawa, T. 1991. Acceleration effect of wood vinegar from Quercus crispula on the mycelial growth of some basidiomycetes. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan 32: 55-64.