Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30184
Influence of Drought on Yield and Yield Components in White Bean
Authors: Gholamreza Habibi
Abstract:In order to study seed yield and seed yield components in bean under reduced irrigation condition and assessment drought tolerance of genotypes, 15 lines of White beans were evaluated in two separate RCB design with 3 replications under stress and non stress conditions. Analysis of variance showed that there were significant differences among varieties in terms of traits under study, indicating the existence of genetic variation among varieties. The results indicate that drought stress reduced seed yield, number of seed per plant, biological yield and number of pod in White been. In non stress condition, yield was highly correlated with the biological yield, whereas in stress condition it was highly correlated with harvest index. Results of stepwise regression showed that, selection can we done based on, biological yield, harvest index, number of seed per pod, seed length, 100 seed weight. Result of path analysis showed that the highest direct effect, being positive, was related to biological yield in non stress and to harvest index in stress conditions. Factor analysis were accomplished in stress and nonstress condition a, there were 4 factors that explained more than 76 percent of total variations. We used several selection indices such as Stress Susceptibility Index ( SSI ), Geometric Mean Productivity ( GMP ), Mean Productivity ( MP ), Stress Tolerance Index ( STI ) and Tolerance Index ( TOL ) to study drought tolerance of genotypes, we found that the best Stress Index for selection tolerance genotypes were STI, GMP and MP were the greatest correlations between these Indices and seed yield under stress and non stress conditions. In classification of genotypes base on phenotypic characteristics, using cluster analysis ( UPGMA ), all allels classified in 5 separate groups in stress and non stress conditions.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1079518Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1705
 Acosta Gallegos, J. A., and Adams. M. W. 1991. Plant traits and yield stability of dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) cultivars under drought stress. J. Agric. Sci. 117:213-219.
 Ahmadi. J., H. Zeinali_Khanghah., M. Rostami., R. Chogan. and H. R. 2000. Evaluation tolerance index and use by plot methods in hybrid maize. Iran J. Agri. J. of Iran. 31: 513-523.
 Azizi, F., Rezaei, A. M., and Meybody. M. 2001. evaluation genotypic and phenotypic diversity and factor analysis of morphological characters in bean genotypes. Iranian Journal. Sci. Techology &. Natur. Resour. Vol. 5(3):140-127.
 Baigorri, H., Antolini, M.C., Sanchez-diaz, M. 1999. Reproductive response of two morphological different pea cultivars to drought. European Journal of Agronomy. v.10. p.119-128.
 Barrios, N. A., Hoogenboom, G., and Nesmith, S. D. 2005. Drought stress and the distribution of vegetative and reproductive traits of a bean cultivar. Sci. Agric. v.62. n.1. p.18-22.
 Beaver, J.S. and J.C. Rosas. 1998. Heritability of the length of reproductive period and rate of seed mass accumulation in common bean. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 123:407-411.
 Beizaei. A. 2002. evaluation qualitative and quantitative characters and theirs relation with seed yield in White, Red and Pinto bean genotypes. M.Se thesis of Agriculural Islamic Azad University, Iran_ Kraj.
 Blum, A., B .Sinmene, and Ziv, O. 1985. An evaluation of seed and seedling drought tolerance screening test in wheat .Euphytica. 22:727- 736.
 Bramel, P. L., Hinz, P. N., Green, D. E., and Shibles, R. M. 1984. Use of principal factor analysis in the study of three stem termination types of soybean. Euphytica 33:387-400.
 COSTA-FRANCA, M.G., THI, A.T., PIMENTEL, C., PEREYRA, R.O., ZUILY-FODIL, Y., LAFFRAY, D. 2000. Differences in growth and water relations among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induced drought stress. Environmental Experiment Botany.v.43. p.227- 237.
 Denis, J. C., and Adams, M. W. 1972. A factor analysis of plant variables related to yield in dry beans. I. Morphological traits. Crop Sci. 18:71-78.
 FARAH, S.M. 1981. An examination of the effect of water stress on leaf growth of field beans, crop growth and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.96, p.327-336.
 Fernandez, G. C. J. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing of plant stress tolerance. In adaptation of Food Crop to Temperature and water stress. (ed. Kue, C. G.), AVRDC. Shanhua, Tawian. pp. 257-270.
 ] Fisher, R. A., and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat, cultivar, I grain yield responses .Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29:897- 912.
 Foster, E.F., A. Pajarito, and J. Acosta-Gallegos. 1995. Moisture stress impact on N partitioning, N remobilization and N-use efficiency in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 124:27-37.
 Frahm, M.A., J.C. Rosas, N. Mayek-Pérez, E. L┘Ä pez-Salinas, J.A. Acosta-Gallegos, J. D. Kelly. 2004. Breeding Beans for Resistance to Terminal Drought in the Lowland Tropics. Euphytica 136: 223-232.
 Habibi. G. R., M. R. Ghanadha, A. R. Sohani and H. R. Dory. 2006. Evaluation of relation of seed yield with important agronomic traits of Red bean by different analysis methods in stress water condition. J. Agri. Sci. Nat. Res. 38: 44-58.
 Haurd EA ( 1976 ) Plant breeding for drought resistance. In: Koslowski, T. T. (ed.). Water Deficits and Plant Growth. Academic Press. New York. USA. 4: 317-353.
 Johnson, R. A., and Wichern, D. W. 1982. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall Internat. Inc., New york. 26 . Mouhouche, B., Ruget, F., and Delecolle, R. 1998. Effects of water Stress Applied at different Phenological phases on yield components of dwarf bean. Agronomic 18: 3, 197-207.
 Mc clean, P.E., Myers, J.R., and Hammond, J.J. 1993. Coefficient of parentage and Cluster analysis of
 North America dry bean cultivars. Crop Sci: Vol.33 (1): 190-197.
 Mohamadi, A., Ahmadi, J. Habibi, D. 2005. selection indices for drought tolerance in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum). Iranian Journal of Agronomy & Plant. Breeding. Vol. 1, No. 1: 47-62
 Mwanamwenge, J., Loss, S.P., Siddique, K.H.M., Cochs, P.S. 1999. Effect of water stress during floral initiation, flowering and podding on the growth and yield of faba bean ( Vicia faba L.). European Journal of Agronomy. v.11. p.1-11.
 Ramirez-Vallejo. P& j. D. Kelly ( 1998 ) traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica 99:127-136.
 Rosielle, A, A. & J. Hamblin ( 1981 ) Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments, Crop Sci 21:943-946.
 Santalla, M., Eseribano, M. R., and Ron, A. M. 1993. Correlation between agronomic and immature pod characters in population of French bean. Abs. On plant Breed. Vol.63(4):495.
 Schneder, K. A., Rosales-Serna, R., Ibarra -Perez F., Cazares -Enriquez, B., Acostagallegos, J. A., Rmirez-vallejo, P., Wassimi, N., and Kelly, J. D. 1997. Improving common bean performance under drought stress, Crop Sci. 37:43-50.
 Schoonhoven, A. Van and Voysest, O. 1991. Common beans research for crop improvement C.A.B International in Association with CIAT.
 Singh, S.P. 1995. Selection for water-stress tolerance in interracial populations of common bean. Crop Sci. 35:118-124.
 Singh, S. P., Ter├ín. H., and Gutiérrez, J. A. 2001b. Registration of SEA 5 and SEA 13 drought tolerant dry bean germplasm. Crop Sci. 41: 276- 277
 Subbarao, G., C. Johansen, A. Slinkard, R. Nageswara, N. Saxena, and Y. Chauhan. 1995. Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Critical review in Plant Science. 14(6):469-523.
 Szilagyi, L. 2003. Influence of drought on seed yield components in common bean, Blug. J. Plant Phsio., Special Issue. 320-330.
 Teran, H., and Singh, S. P. 2002.Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Sci. 42(1).
 Walton, P. D. 1971. The use of factor analysis in determining characters for by yield selection in wheat. Euphytica. 20: 416-421.
 Wang, W., B. Vinocur, A. Altman, 2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta, 218, 1-14.
 WEIN, H.C., SANDSTED, R.F., WALLACE, D.H. 1973. The influence of flower removal on growth and seed yield of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. v.98. p.45-49.
 White, J.W., R. Ochoa, F. Ibarra and S.P. Singh. 1994. Inheritance of seed yield, maturity and seed weight of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under semi-arid rainfed conditions. J. of Agricultural Science 122:265-273.
 ] White, J.W. and S.P. Singh. 1991. Breeding for adaptation to drought p. 501-551. In A. van Schoonhoven and O. Voysest (ed.) Common beans: Research for crop improvement. C.A. B. International. Wallingford, U.K. and CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
 XIA, M.Z. , 1997.Effect of soil drought during the generative development phase on seed yield and nutrient uptake of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, v.48, p.447-451.
 Zlatev, S. Z., and Yordanov, I. T. 2005. Effects of soil drought on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in bean plants. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 30 ( 3-4 ). 3-18.