Vapor Bubble Dynamics in Upward Subcooled Flow Boiling During Void Evolution
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Vapor Bubble Dynamics in Upward Subcooled Flow Boiling During Void Evolution

Authors: Rouhollah Ahmadi, Tatsuya Ueno, Tomio Okawa

Abstract:

Bubble generation was observed using a high-speed camera in subcooled flow boiling at low void fraction. Constant heat flux was applied on one side of an upward rectangular channel to make heated test channel. Water as a working fluid from high subcooling to near saturation temperature was injected step by step to investigate bubble behavior during void development. Experiments were performed in two different pressures condition close to 2bar and 4bar. It was observed that in high subcooling when boiling was commenced, bubble after nucleation departed its origin and slid beside heated surface. In an observation window mean release frequency of bubble fb,mean, nucleation site Ns and mean bubble volume Vb,mean in each step of experiments were measured to investigate wall vaporization rate. It was found that in proximity of PNVG vaporization rate was increased significantly in compare with condensation rate which remained in low value.

Keywords: Subcooled flow boiling, Bubble dynamics, Void fraction, Sliding bubble.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1079308

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2047

References:


[1] S. C. Lee and S. G. Bankoff, Prediction of the onset of flow instability in transient subcooled flow boiling, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 139, 1993, pp. 149-159
[2] P. G. Kroeger, N. Zuber, An analysis of the effects of various parameters on the average void fractions in subcooled boiling, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 11, 1968, pp. 211-233.
[3] S. C. Lee and S. G. Bankoff, A Comparison of Predictive Models for the Onset of Significant Void at Low Pressures in Forced-Convection Subcooled Boiling, KSME International Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1998, pp. 504-513
[4] S. Levy, Forced convection subcooled boiling prediction of vapor volumetric fraction, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 10, 1967, pp. 951-965.
[5] P. Saha, N. Zuber, Point of net vapor generation and vapor void fraction in subcooled boiling, Proceedings of the 5th Heat Transfer Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 1974, pp. 175-179.
[6] Bowring, R. W., 1962, Physical Model Based on Bubble Detachment and Calculation of Steam Voidage in the Subcooled Region of a Heated Channel, HPR-10, Institutt for Atomenergi, Halden, Norway.
[7] J.T. Rogers, M. Salcudean, Z. Abdullah, D. McLeod, D. Poirier, The onset of significant void in up-flow boiling of water at low pressure and velocities, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 30, 1987, pp. 2247-2260.
[8] J.G. Collier, J.R. Thome, Convective Boiling and Condensation, third ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994. pp. 325-374.
[9] G. R. Warrier & V. K. Dhir , Heat Transfer and Wall Heat Flux Partitioning During Subcooled Flow Nucleate BoilingÔÇöA Review, Journal of Heat Transfer 128, 2006, pp. 1243-1256.
[10] R. Ahmadi, T. Ueno, T. Okawa, Bubble dynamics at boiling incipience in subcooled upward flow boiling, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55 (1-3), 2012, pp. 488-497.
[11] Dix, G. E., Vapor Void Fraction For Forced Convection with Subcooled Boiling at Low Flow Rates, 1971, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
[12] E.L. Bibeau, M. Salcudean, A study of bubble ebullition in forcedconvective subcooled nucleate boiling at low pressures, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 37, 1994, pp. 2245-2259.
[13] T. Okawa, T. Ishida, I. Kataoka, M. Mori, Bubble rise characteristics after the departure from a nucleation site in vertical upflow boiling of subcooled water, Nuclear Engineering and Design 235, 2005, pp. 1149- 1161.
[14] O. Zeitoun, M. Shoukri, Bubble behavior and mean diameter in subcooled flow boiling, Transactions of ASME, Journal of Heat Transfer 118, 1996, pp. 110-116