Do Students Really Understand Topology in the Lesson? A Case Study

Authors: Serkan Narli

Abstract:

This study aims to specify to what extent students understand topology during the lesson and to determine possible misconceptions. 14 teacher trainees registered at Secondary School Mathematics education department were observed in the topology lessons throughout a semester and data collected at the first topology lesson is presented here. Students- knowledge was evaluated using a written test right before and after the topology lesson. Thus, what the students learnt in terms of the definition and examples of topologic space were specified as well as possible misconceptions. The findings indicated that students did not fully comprehend the topic and misunderstandings were due to insufficient pre-requisite knowledge of abstract mathematical topics and mathematical notation.

Keywords: Mathematics Education, Teacher Education, Topology.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1079220

References:

[1] Doran, R. L. (1972). Misconceptions of selected science concepts held by elementary school students. Journal of Reserach in Science Teaching, 9 (2), 127-137.
[2] Wittrock, M.C. (1974). Learning as a generative process, Educational Psychology, 11, 87-95.
[3] Albert, E. (1978). Development of the concept of heat in children. Science Education, 63, 389-99.
[4] Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children-s science. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.
[5] Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children-s ideas in science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
[6] Hilton, P. (1971), Topology in the High School, Educational Studies in Mathematics, voI.3, pp.436-453.
[7] Yates, D.S. (1971), The Development and Evaluation of a Text in the Topology of the Plane for Secondary Teachers, Unpublished thesis for the PhD The Florida State University , Florida, USA
[8] Paul J. Kelly (1971), Topology and Transformations in High School Geometry Educational Studies in Mathematics 3 477-481.
[9] Wallrabenste─▒n, H. (1973), Experiments in Teaching Intuitive Topology in the 5th and 6th Grades, Educational Studies in Mathematics, voI.5, pp.91-108.
[10] Ramesh Kapadia (1974) A Critical Examination of Piaget-Inhelder-s View on Topology, Educational Studies in Mathematics 5, 419-424
[11] Bess, J. L. (1977), The Entering FreshmenTopology: Guidlines fort he Design of a Student Data Collection System and Its Use in Teaching and Administration, report. Teachers Collage, Columbia University, New York, USA
[12] Wilhelm Schipper (1983) The Topological Primacy Theses: Genetic and Didactic Aspects, Educational Studies in Mathematics 14, 285-296
[13] Marshall, J. (1987), Examination of a Learning Style Topology, Research in Higer Education, voI.26-4, pp.417-429.
[14] Mahoney, M.W. (1991), Intuitive Topology for the High School Geometry Classroom, Unpublished thesis for Master Degree. Kean College of New Jersey , USA
[15] Smith, H. (2001), A Student-Oriented Approach to Topology, Unpublished thesis for the PhD. University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, Illinois, USA
[16] Hairstone S.E., (2003), R.L. Moore Radical Constructivism, Unpublished thesis for the Ph D. University of Incarnate Word, USA
[17] Lewis, A.C., (2004), The beginnings of the R.L. Moore school of topology, Historia Mathematica 31 (2004) 279-295
[18] Padraig M., McLoughlin M. M., (2008), Inquiry Based Learning: A Modified Moore Method Approach to Encourage Student Research, 11th Annual Legacy of R. L. Moore Conference, University of Pennsylvania, Kutztown
[19] Padraig M., McLoughlin M. M., (2008), Crossing the Bridge to Higher Mathematics: Using a Modified Moore Approach to Assist Students Transitioning to Higher Mathematics, Annual Meeting of the Mathematical Association of America, University of Pennsylvania, Kutztown, San Diego.U.S.A.
[20] Karasar,N (2003). Bilimsel Ara┼ƒt─▒rma Yöntemi, ISBN:975-591-046-8 Nobel Yay─▒n Da─ƒ─▒t─▒m 12. Bask─▒, ANKARA