Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30685
Why Traditional Technology Acceptance Models Won't Work for Future Information Technologies?

Authors: Carsten Röcker

Abstract:

This paper illustrates why existing technology acceptance models are only of limited use for predicting and explaining the adoption of future information and communication technologies. It starts with a general overview over technology adoption processes, and presents several theories for the acceptance as well as adoption of traditional information technologies. This is followed by an overview over the recent developments in the area of information and communication technologies. Based on the arguments elaborated in these sections, it is shown why the factors used to predict adoption in existing systems, will not be sufficient for explaining the adoption of future information and communication technologies.

Keywords: Ambient intelligence, Ubiquitous and pervasive computing, Technology diffusion, Technology AcceptanceModels

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1078965

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1787

References:


[1] Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., Todd, P.A. (1992). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, pp. 227 - 247.
[2] Agarwal, R., Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. In: Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 204 - 215.
[3] Agarwal, R., Prasad, J. (1999). Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies? In: Decision Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 361 - 391.
[4] Ajzen I., Madden T. J. (1986). Prediction of Goal Directed Behaviour: Attitudes, Attitudes, and Perceived Behavioral Control. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 453 - 474.
[5] Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Action: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In: J. Kuhl, J. Beckmann (Eds.): Action Control From Cognition to Behavior. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 11 - 39.
[6] Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[7] Alshare, K., Grandon, E., Miller, D. (2004). Antecedents of Computer Technology Usage: Considerations of the Technology Acceptance Model in the Academic Environment. In: Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 164 - 180.
[8] Barnes, S. J., Huff, S. L. (2003). Rising Sun: iMode and The Wireless Internet. In: Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46, No. 11, pp. 78 - 84.
[9] Beier, G., Spiekermann, S., Rothensee, M. (2006). Die Akzeptanz zuk├╝nftiger Ubiquitous Computing Anwendungen. In: A. M. Heinecke, H. Paul (Eds.): Mensch & Computer 2006: Mensch und Computer im Struktur-Wandel. Oldenbourg Verlag, M├╝nchen, Germany, pp. 145 - 154.
[10] Benham, H. C., Raymond, B. C. (1996). Information Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Voice Mail Introduction. In: ACM SIGCPR Computer Personnel, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 3 - 25.
[11] Bohn, J., Coroama, V., Langheinrich, M., Mattern, F., Rohs, M. (2003). Disappearing Computers Everywhere - Living in a World of Smart Everyday Objects. Paper presented at the Conference on New Media, Technology and Everyday Life in Europe, London, UK, April 2003.
[12] Bohn, J., Coroama, V., Langheinrich, M., Mattern, F., Rohs, M. (2004). Living in a World of Smart Everyday Objects - Social, Economic, and Ethical Implications. In: Journal of Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 763 - 786.
[13] Bohn, J., Coroama, V., Langheinrich, M., Mattern, F., Rohs, M. (2005). Social, Economic, and Ethical Implications of Ambient Intelligence and Ubiquitous Computing. In: W. Weber, J. Rabaey, E. Aarts (Eds.): Ambient Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 5 - 29.
[14] Burton-Jones, A., Hubona, G. S. (2005). Individual Differences and Usage Behavior: Revisiting a Technology Acceptance Model Assumption. In: ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 58 - 77.
[15] Chang, M. K. (1998). Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17, pp. 1825 - 1834.
[16] Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model. In: Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 185 - 204.
[17] Chau, P. Y. K., Lai, V. S. K. (2003) An Empirical Investigation of the Determinants of User Acceptance of Internet Banking. In: Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 123 - 145.
[18] Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L. (2001). Adoption, Diffusion, and Infusion of IT: The Future of Diffusion Research. In: ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 7 - 12.
[19] Chin, W. W., Todd, P. A. (1995). On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 237 - 246.
[20] Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills. In: Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 118 - 143.
[21] Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A., Huff, S. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 145 - 158.
[22] Cooper, R. B., Zmud, R. W. (1990). Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach. In: Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 123 -139.
[23] Davis, F. (1986) A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[24] Davis, R. D., Bagozzi, R. R., Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. In: Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982 - 1003.
[25] Dishaw, M. T., Strong, D. M. (1998). Assessing Software Maintenance Tool Utilization Using Task-Technology Fit and Fitness-for-Use Models. In: Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 151 - 179.
[26] Dishaw, M. T., Strong, D. M. (1998). Supporting Software Maintenance with Software Engineering Tools: A Computed Task-Technology Fit Analysis. In: Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 44, pp. 107 - 120.
[27] Dishaw, M. T., Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs. In: Information and Management, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 9 - 21.
[28] Dishaw, M. T., Strong, D. M. (2003). The Effect of Task and Tool Experience on Maintenance CASE Tool Usage. In: Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 1 - 16.
[29] Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA.
[30] Gallivan, M. J. (2001). Adoption, Diffusion, and Infusion of IT: Organizational Adoption and Assimilation of Complex Technological Innovations: Development and Application of a new Framework. In: ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 51 - 85.
[31] Gefen, D., Straub, D. (1997). Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 389 - 400.
[32] George, J., Nunamaker, J. F., Valacich, J. S. (1992). Electronic Meeting Systems as Innovation: A Study of the Innovation Process. In: Information and Management, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 187 - 195.
[33] Goodhue, D. L. (1992). User Evaluations of MIS Success: What Are We Really Measuring? In: Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, pp. 303 - 314.
[34] Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems. In: Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 1827 - 1844.
[35] Goodhue, D. L. (1998). Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information Systems. In: Decision Sciences, Vol. 29, No.1, pp. 105 - 138.
[36] Hausenblas, H., Carron, A., Mack, D. (1997). Application of the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior to Exercise Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. In: Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, Vol. 19, pp. 36 - 51.
[37] Hendrickson, A. R., Massey, P. D., Cronan, T. P. (1993). On the Test- Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 227 - 230.
[38] Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 279 - 305.
[39] Iivari, J. (1993). From a Macro Innovation Theory of IS Diffusion to a Micro Innovation Theory of IS Adoption: An Application to CASE Adoption. In: D. Avison, J. E. Kendall, J. I. DeGross (Eds.): Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development. Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 295 - 315.
[40] Johnson, R. A., Hardgrave, B. C., Doke, E. R. (1999). An Industry Analysis of Developer Beliefs about Object-Oriented Systems Development. In: Database, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 47 - 64.
[41] Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 183 - 213.
[42] Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P. (2003). Why Do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model. In: Information and Management, Vol. 40, pp. 191 - 204.
[43] Leonard-Barton, D., Deschamps, I. (1998). Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology. In: Management Science, Vol. 14, pp. 1252 - 1265.
[44] Liu, L., Ma, Q. (2006). Perceived System Performance: A Test of an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. In: ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 37, No. 2-3, pp. 51 - 59.
[45] Lucas, H. C., Ginzberg, M. J., Schultz, R. L. (1990). Information Systems Implementation: Testing a Structural Model. Ablex Press, Norwood, NJ, USA.
[46] Ma, Q., Liu, L. (2004). The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta- Analysis of Empirical Findings. In: Journal of End User Computing, Vol. 16, pp. 59 - 72.
[47] Mao, E., Palvia, P. (2006). Testing an Extended Model of IT Acceptance in the Chinese Cultural Context. In: ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 37, No. 2-3, pp. 20 - 32.
[48] Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, pp. 173 - 191.
[49] Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources. In: The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 86 - 112.
[50] Mattern, F. (2003). Allgegenwärtiges Rechnen - Die Vision von der Informatisierung der Welt. In: Login, No. 125, pp. 10 - 13.
[51] Mattern, F. (2004). Ubiquitous Computing: Eine Einf├╝hrung mit Anmerkungen zu den sozialen und rechtlichen Folgen. In: J. Taeger, A. Wiebe (Eds.): Mobilit├ñt, Telematik, Recht. Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, Köln, Germany, pp. 1 - 34.
[52] Mattern, F. (2004). Ubiquitous Computing: Szenarien einer informatisierten Welt. In: A. Zerdick, A. Picot, K. Schrape, J.-C. Burgelman, R. Silverstone, V. Feldmann, D. K. Heger, C. Wolff (Eds.): E-Merging Media - Kommunikation und Medienwirtschaft der Zukunft. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 155 - 174.
[53] Mattern, F. (2005). Ubiquitous Computing: Scenarios From an Informatised World. In: A. Zerdick, A. Picot, K. Schrape, J.-C. Burgelman, R. Silverstone, V. Feldmann, C. Wernick, C. Wolff (Eds.): E-Merging Media - Communication and the Media Economy of the Future. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 145 - 163.
[54] Mattern, F. (2005). Leben und Lernen in einer von Informationstechnologie durch-drungenen Welt - Visionen und Erwartungen. In: M. Franzen (Ed.): Lernplattformen (Web-Based Training 2005). EMPA-Akademie, D├╝bendorf, Switzerland, pp. 39 - 61.
[55] Mattern, F. (2007). Acht Thesen zur Informatisierung des Alltags. In: F. Mattern (Ed.): Die Informatisierung des Alltags - Leben in smarten Umgebungen. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 11 - 16.
[56] Mattern, F. (2008). Allgegenwärtige Informationsverarbeitung - Technologietrends und Auswirkungen des Ubiquitous Computing. In: A. Rossnagel, T. Sommerlatte, U. Winand (Eds.): Digitale Visionen - Zur Gestaltung allgegenwärtiger Informations-technologien. Springer- Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 11 - 38.
[57] McCloskey, D. (2003). Evaluating Electronic Commerce Acceptance with the Technology Acceptance Model. In: Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 49 - 57.
[58] Moore, G. (1965). Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits. In: Electronics, Vol. 38, No. 8, pp. 114 - 117.
[59] Moore, G. C., Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. In: Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 192 - 222.
[60] Moore, G. C., Benbasat, I. (1996). Integrating Diffusion of Innovations and Theory of Reasoned Action Models to Predict Utilization of Information Technology by End-Users. In: K. Kautz, J. Pries-Heje (Eds.): Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology. Chapman and Hall, London, England, pp. 132 - 146.
[61] Prescott. M. B., Conger, S. A. (1995). Information Technology Innovations: A Classification by IT Locus of Impact and Research Approach. In: ACM SIGMIS Database Archive, Vol. 26, No. 2-3, special double issue: Diffusion of Technological Innovation, pp. 20 - 41.
[62] Rawstorne, P., Jayasuriya, R., Caputi, P. (2000). Issues in Predicting and Explaining Usage Behaviors with the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior when Usage is Mandatory. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS-00), pp. 35 - 44.
[63] Riemenschneider, C. K., Harrison, D. A., Mykytyn, P. P. (2003). Understanding IT Adoption Decisions in Small Business: Integrating Current Theories. In: Information & Management, No. 40, pp. 269 - 285.
[64] Röcker, C. (2009). Acceptance of Future Workplace Systems: How the Social Situation Influences the Usage Intention of Ambient Intelligence Technologies in Work Environments. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Work With Computer Systems (WWCS-09), Beijing, China.
[65] Röcker, C. (2009). Ambient Intelligence in the Production and Retail Sector: Emerging Opportunities and Potential Pitfalls. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation, Management and Technology (ICIMT'09), May 27-29, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1393 - 1404.
[66] Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd Edition). The Free Press, New York, USA.
[67] Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th Edition). The Free Press, New York, USA.
[68] Ryan, B., Gross, N. C. (1943). The Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn in Two Iowa Communities. In: Rural Sociology, Vol. 8, pp. 15 - 24.
[69] Saga, V., Zmud, R. (1994). The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, Routinization, and Infusion. In: L. Levine (Ed.): Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology. Elsevier Science Publications, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp. 67-86.
[70] Segars, A. H., Grover, V. (1993). Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 517 - 525.
[71] Shiode, N. (2004). When Space Shrinks - Digital Communities and Ubiquitous Society: Digitally United? A Case Study on the Penetration of Wireless and Ubiquitous Information Technologies in Japan. In: Proceedings of the Winter International Symposium on Information and Communication Technologies (WISICT-04), pp. 1 - 6.
[72] Straub, D., Keil, M., and Brenner, W. (1997). Testing the Technology Acceptance Model Across Cultures: A Three Country Study. In: Information & Management, Vol. 33, No.1, pp. 1 - 11.
[73] Strong, D. M., Dishaw, M. T., Bandy, D. B. (2006). Extending Task Technology Fit with Computer Self-Efficacy. In: ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 37, No. 2-3, pp. 96 - 107.
[74] Subramanian, G. H. (1994). A Replication of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Measurement. In: Decision Science, Vol. 25, No. 5-6, pp. 863 - 874.
[75] Szajna, B. (1994). Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 319 - 324.
[76] Taylor, S., Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. In: Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, pp. 144 - 176.
[77] Taylor, S., Todd, P. A. (1995). Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 561 - 570.
[78] Tennenhouse, D. (2000). Proactive Computing. In: Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 43 - 50.
[79] Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 239 - 260.
[80] Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. In: Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 342 - 365.
[81] Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. In: Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186 - 204.
[82] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. (2000). Why Don-t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 115 - 139.
[83] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425 - 478.
[84] Weiser, M. (1991). The Computer for the Twenty-First Century. In: Scientific American, Vol. 265, No. 3, pp. 94 - 104.
[85] Wynekoop, J. L., Senn, J. A., Conger, S. A. (1992). The Implementation of CASE Tools: An Innovation Diffusion Approach. K. E. Kendall, K. Lyytinen, J. I. DeGross (Eds.): The Impact of Computer-Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development. Elsevier Science Publications, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp. 25 - 41.