Effect of Different Treatments on the Periphyton Quantity and Quality in Experimental Fishponds
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Effect of Different Treatments on the Periphyton Quantity and Quality in Experimental Fishponds

Authors: T. Kosáros, D. Gál, F. Pekár, Gy. Lakatos


Periphyton development and composition were studied in three different treatments: (i) two fishpond units of wetland-type wastewater treatment pond systems, (ii) two fishponds in combined intensive-extensive fish farming systems and (iii) three traditional polyculture fishponds. Results showed that amounts of periphyton developed in traditional polyculture fishponds (iii) were different compared to the other treatments (i and ii), where the main function of ponds was stated wastewater treatment. Negative correlation was also observable between water quality parameters and periphyton production. The lower trophity, halobity and saprobity level of ponds indicated higher amount of periphyton. The dry matter content of periphyton was significantly higher in the samples, which were developed in traditional polyculture fishponds (2.84±3.02 g m-2 day-1, whereby the ash content in dry matter 74%), than samples taken from (i) (1.60±2.32 g m-2 day-1, 61%) and (ii) fishponds (0.65±0.45 g m-2 day-1, 81%).

Keywords: Artificial substrate, fishpond, periphyton, waterquality

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1078044

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1403


[1] A. L. Behning, Zur Erforschung der am Flussboden der Wolga lebenden Organismen, Monogr. volz. Biol. Stanc., Saratow, 1924.
[2] M. E. Azim, M. C. J. Verdegem, A. A. Van Dam and M. C. M. Beveridge, Periphyton and Aquatic Production, Ed. Periphyton Ecology, Exploitation and Management, CABI Publishing, London, UK. 2005, pp. 1-14, 179-188.
[3] D. L. Kirchman, L. Mazzella, R. S. Alberte and R. Mitchell, "Epiphytic bacterial production on Zostera marina," Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., vol. 15, pp. 117-123, Jan, 1984.
[4] R. K. Neely and R. G. Wetzel, "Autumnal production by bacteria and autotrophs attached to Typha latifolia L. detritus," J. Freshwater Ecol., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 253-267, Jun, 1997.
[5] G. Lakatos, K. M. Kiss and P. Juhász, "Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Hungary," Water Science Technology, vol. 33, pp. 331-336, 1997.
[6] R. L. Welcomme, "An evaluation of the acadjas method of fishing as practised in the coastal lagoons of Dahomey (West Africa)," J. Fish. Biol., vol. 4, pp. 39-55, 1972.
[7] K. M. Shankar, C. V. Mohan and M. C. Nandeesha, "Promotion of substrate based microbial biofilms in ponds - a low cost technology to boost fish production," The ICLARM Quarterly NAGA, vol. 21, pp. 18- 22, 1998.
[8] M. A. Wahab and M. G. Kibria, "Katha and kua fisheries - unusual fishing methods in Bangladesh," Aquaculture News, vol. 18, pp. 24, 1994.
[9] L. Felföldy, The biological water qualification, (A biol├│giai v├¡zminős├¡tés) VIZDOK, Budapest, 1987, pp. 153-198.
[10] L. A. Hansson, "Factors regulating periphytic algal biomass," Limnol. Oceanogr., vol. 37, pp. 322-328. 1992.