Compressive Properties of a Synthetic Bone Substitute for Vertebral Cancellous Bone

Authors: H. N. Mehmanparast, J.M. Mac-Thiong., Y. Petit

Abstract:

Transpedicular screw fixation in spinal fractures, degenerative changes, or deformities is a well-established procedure. However, important rate of fixation failure due to screw bending, loosening, or pullout are still reported particularly in weak bone stock in osteoporosis. To overcome the problem, mechanism of failure has to be fully investigated in vitro. Post-mortem human subjects are less accessible and animal cadavers comprise limitations due to different geometry and mechanical properties. Therefore, the development of a synthetic model mimicking the realistic human vertebra is highly demanded. A bone surrogate, composed of Polyurethane (PU) foam analogous to cancellous bone porous structure, was tested for 3 different densities in this study. The mechanical properties were investigated under uniaxial compression test by minimizing the end artifacts on specimens. The results indicated that PU foam of 0.32 g.cm-3 density has comparable mechanical properties to human cancellous bone in terms of young-s modulus and yield strength. Therefore, the obtained information can be considered as primary step for developing a realistic cancellous bone of human vertebral body. Further evaluations are also recommended for other density groups.

Keywords: Cancellous bone, Pedicle screw, Polyurethane foam, Synthetic bone

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1077803

References:

[1] F. Denis, "The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries",Spine, vol.8(8),pp. 817-831, 1983.
[2] R.F. McLain, E. Sparling and D.R. Benson, "Early failure of shortsegment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. A preliminary report",The Journal of bone and joint surgery, American vol. 75(2), pp. 162, 1993.
[3] T.A. Zdeblick, D. N. Kunz, et al., "Pedicle screw pullout strength: correlation with insertional torque",Spine, vol. 18(12), pp. 1673, 1993.
[4] M. M. Panjabi, "Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework",Spine, vol.13(10), pp. 1129, 1988.
[5] B.Sandén, et al., "The significance of radiolucent zones surrounding pedicle screws: Definition of screw loosening in spinal instrumentation",Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British vol.86(3), pp. 457,2004.
[6] S.I. Esses, B.L. Sachs, and V. Dreyzin, "Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members",Spine, vol. 18(15), pp. 2231, 1993.
[7] C. A. Dickman, et al., "Transpedicular screw-rod fixation of the lumbar spine: operative technique and outcome in 104 cases".Journal of neurosurgery, vol.77(6), pp. 860-870, 1992.
[8] R. A. Lehman Jr, et al., "Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis",Spine, vol. 28(18),pp. 2058, 2003.
[9] M.H. Krag, et al., "Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation",Spine, vol. 13(1), pp. 27, 1988.
[10] T. Lund, et al., "Interbody cage stabilisation in the lumbar spine: biomechanical evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density",Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British vol.80(2),pp. 351, 1998.
[11] J. Aerssens, et al., "Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research",Endocrinology, vol.139(2), pp. 663, 1998.
[12] ASTM.F 1839-01,"Standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopedic devices and instruments", 2007.
[13] A.G.Au, et al., "A New Bone Surrogate Model for Testing Interbody Device Subsidence",Spine, vol. 36(16), pp. 1289-1296, 2011.
[14] R. F. McLain, et al., "The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability: A synthetic model",Spine, vol. 22(13),pp. 1454, 1997.
[15] J. Szivek, M. Thomas, and J. Benjamin, "Technical note. Characterization of a synthetic foam as a model for human cancellous bone",Journal of Applied Biomaterials, vol. 4(3),pp. 269-272, 1993.
[16] J.A. Szivek, J.D. Thompson, and J.B. Benjamin, "Characterization of three formulations of a synthetic foam as models for a range of human cancellous bone types",Journal of Applied Biomaterials, vol. 6(2),pp. 125-128, 1995.
[17] M.S. Thompson, et al., "Compressive and shear properties of commercially available polyurethane foams",Journal of biomechanical engineering, vol.125,pp. 732, 2003.
[18] R.P. Heaney,"Is there a role for bone quality in fragility fractures?"Calcified Tissue International, vol. 53,pp. 3-6, 1993.
[19] M. D. Grynpas, D. Chachra, and K. Lundon, "Bone quality in animal models of osteoporosis",Drug development research, vol. 49(3),pp. 146- 158, 2000.
[20] G.Bell, et al., "Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis",Calcified Tissue International, vol. 1(1),pp. 75- 86, 1967.
[21] E.F.Morgan, et al., "Nonlinear behavior of trabecular bone at small strains",Journal of biomechanical engineering, vol. 123,pp. 1, 2001.
[22] K.Dupuis, "├ëtude des facteurs influen├ºant l-évaluation du comportement mécanique de l-os par tomodensitométrie", M.Sc. Dissertation, ├ëcole de Technologie Superieure, Unpublished.
[23] T.M. Keaveny, et al., "Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone",Journal of orthopaedic research, vol. 15(1),pp. 101-110, 1997.
[24] T. M. Keaveny, et al., "Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains",Journal of biomechanics, vol. 27(9),pp. 1127-1129, 1131-1136, 1994.
[25] ASTM.D 1621-00,"Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties Of Rigid Cellular Plastics", 2007.
[26] P. Patel, D. Shepherd, and D. Hukins, "Compressive properties of commercially available polyurethane foams as mechanical models for osteoporotic human cancellous bone",BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 9(1),pp. 137, 2008.
[27] D.L. Kopperdahl, and T.M. Keaveny, "Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone",Journal of biomechanics, vol. 31(7),pp. 601-608, 1998.
[28] R. M.Lin, K. H. Tsai, and G.L. Chang, "Distribution and regional strength of trabecular bone in the porcine lumbar spine",Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 12(5),pp. 331-336, 1997.
[29] J. Teo, et al., "Relationship between CT intensity, micro-architecture and mechanical properties of porcine vertebral cancellous bone",Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 21(3),pp. 235-244, 2006.
[30] B.Li, and R.M. Aspden, "Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis",Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 12(4),pp. 641-651, 1997.