Diversity and Public Decision Making

Authors: Karin Hansson, Göran Cars, Mats Danielson, Love Ekenberg, Aron Larsson

Abstract:

Within the realm of e-government, the development has moved towards testing new means for democratic decisionmaking, like e-panels, electronic discussion forums, and polls. Although such new developments seem promising, they are not problem-free, and the outcomes are seldom used in the subsequent formal political procedures. Nevertheless, process models offer promising potential when it comes to structuring and supporting transparency of decision processes in order to facilitate the integration of the public into decision-making procedures in a reasonable and manageable way. Based on real-life cases of urban planning processes in Sweden, we present an outline for an integrated framework for public decision making to: a) provide tools for citizens to organize discussion and create opinions; b) enable governments, authorities, and institutions to better analyse these opinions; and c) enable governments to account for this information in planning and societal decision making by employing a process model for structured public decision making.

Keywords: Negotiation games, Agenda setting, Multi-criteria decision analysis, Elicitation method.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1077525

References:

[1] O. Renn, Risk Analysis and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[2] L. Ekenberg, A. Larsson, J. Idefeldt, and S. Bohman, "The Lack of Transparency in Public Decision Processes," International Journal of Public Information Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2009.
[3] D. Rios Insua, G. E. Kersten, and J. Rios, "Towards Decision Support for Participatory Democracy," Information Systems and E-Business Management, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161-191, 2007.
[4] M. J. Dutta-Bergman, "New Media & Society community satisfaction," New Media & Society, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 89-109, 2005.
[5] Norris, Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 2001.
[6] Å. Grönlund, "Framing electronic government: e-mc3: in Search of Strong Inscriptions," in DEXA 03, 2003.
[7] E. Karamagioli and V. Koulolias, "Challenges and barriers in implementing e-participation tools. One year of experience from implementing Gov2demoss in 64 municipalities in Spain," International Journal of Electronic Governance, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 434-451, 2008.
[8] M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, J. Idefeldt, and A. Larsson, "Using a Software Tool for Public Decision Analysis: The Case of Nacka Municipality," Decision Analysis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 76-90, Jun. 2007.
[9] M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, and A. Riabacke, "A Prescriptive Approach to Elicitation of Decision Data," Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 157-168, Mar. 2009.
[10] M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, A. Larsson, and M. Riabacke, "Transparent Public Decision Making - Discussion and Case Study in Sweden," in e- Democracy, vol. 5, D. Rios Insua and S. French, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010, pp. 263-281.
[11] M. Riabacke, M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, and A. Larsson, "A Prescriptive Approach for Eliciting Imprecise Weight Statements in an MCDA Process," in Algorithmic Decision Theory, vol. 5783, F. Rossi and A. Tsoukias, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 168-179.
[12] K. Hansson, "Reflexive technology for collaborative environments," International Journal of Public Information Systems, vol. 2012, no. 1, pp. 11-28, 2012.
[13] K. Hansson, H. Verhagen, P. Karlström, and A. Larsson, "Reputation and Online Communication: Visualizing Reputational Power to Promote Collaborative Discussions Abstract," in HICSS-46 - Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2012, p. 11.
[14] K. Hansson, P. Karlström, A. Larsson, and H. Verhagen, "Actory: A Tool for Visualizing Reputation as a Means to Formalize Informal Social Behavior," in The Second International Conference on Reputation: "Society, Economy, Trust" ICORE 2011, 2011, p. 16.
[15] K. Hansson, H. Verhagen, P. Karlström, and A. Larsson, "Formalizing informal social behavior - developing a visual tool to support collaborative discussions," in The Seventh International Conference on Collaborative Computing, 2011, p. 8.
[16] A. Larsson, J. Johansson, L. Ekenberg, and M. Danielson, “Decision Analysis with Multiple Objectives in a Framework for Evaluating Imprecision”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol.13, no.5, pp. 495–509, 2005.
[17] M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, J. Johansson
[Idefeldt], and A. Larsson, “Investment Decision Analysis: a case study at SCA Transforest,” in IKE’03: Proceedings of the international conference on information and knowledge engineering: Vols. 1 and 2, 2003, pp. 79–85.
[18] M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, Å. Grönlund, and A. Larsson, “Public Decision Support - Using a DSSto Increase Democratic Transparency,” International Journal of Public Information Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3– 25, 2005.
[19] L. Ekenberg, M. Boman, and M. Danielson, “A Tool for Coordinating Autonomous Agents with Conflicting Goals”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems ICMAS ’95, pp.89– 93, AAAI/MIT Press, 1995.
[20] A. Larsson, L. Ekenberg, and M. Danielson, “Decision Evaluation of Response Strategies in Emergency Management Using Imprecise Assessments,” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, vol. 7, no. 1, 2010.
[21] O. Björkqvist, J. Idefeldt, and A. Larsson, “Risk assessment of new pricing strategies in the district heating market,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2171–2178, May 2010.
[22] G. Cars, Ed., Urban governance, institutional capacity and social milieux. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.