Comparison of Response Surface Designs in a Spherical Region

Authors: Boonorm Chomtee, John J. Borkowski

Abstract:

The objective of the research is to study and compare response surface designs: Central composite designs (CCD), Box- Behnken designs (BBD), Small composite designs (SCD), Hybrid designs, and Uniform shell designs (USD) over sets of reduced models when the design is in a spherical region for 3 and 4 design variables. The two optimality criteria ( D and G ) are considered which larger values imply a better design. The comparison of design optimality criteria of the response surface designs across the full second order model and sets of reduced models for 3 and 4 factors based on the two criteria are presented.

Keywords: design optimality criteria, reduced models, response surface design, spherical design region

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1077303

References:

[1] Mathworks Inc., Matlab Version 7.1, 2010.
[2] Chipman, H.A., "Baysian variable selection with related predictors," The Canadian Journal of Statistics, vol. 24, pp.17-36, 1996.
[3] Borkowski, J.J. and Valeroso, E.S., "Comparison of design optimality criteria of reduced models for response designs in the hypercube," Technometrics, vol. 43, pp. 468-477, 2001.