Aligning IS Development with Users- Work Habits
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32795
Aligning IS Development with Users- Work Habits

Authors: Abbas Moshref Razavi, Rodina Ahmad


As a primitive assumption, if a new information system is able to remind users their old work habits, it should have a better opportunity to be accepted, adopted and finally, utilized. In this paper some theoretical concepts borrowed from psychodynamic theory e.g. ego defenses are discussed to show how such resemblance can be made without necessarily affecting the performance of the new system. The main assertion is a new system should somehow imitate old work habits, not literally, but through following their paces in terms of the order of habitual tensional states including stimulation, defensive actions and satisfactions.

Keywords: information Systems, users' habits, psychodynamic

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1297


[1] Jeff W. Johnson, Emily E. Duehr, Sarah A. Hezlett, John P. Muros, and Kerri L. Ferstl, Modeling the Direct and Indirect Determinants of Different Types of Individual Job Performance, Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Inc, Under contract for United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Technical Report 1236, June 2008.
[2] H. Laughlin. The Ego and its Defenses. Meredith Corporation, New York, 1970.
[3] C. Brenner. An Elementary Textbook of Psychoanalysis. International Universities Press, 1955.
[4] A. Moshref Razavi, R. Ahmad, "Organization as system, psychic dynamism as equilibration: a conceptualization", International Conference on Computer, Electrical, Systems, Science and Engineering (ICCESSE 2010), World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Year 6, Issue 69, August 2010, pp. 86-96.
[5] A. Moshref Razavi, R. Ahmad, "What People Introject in and Project to Information Systems: A psychodynamic view of User-System Interactions", International Conference on Economics and Finance Research, ICEFR 2011, Singapore, 26-28 Feb 2011, To be Published.
[6] A. Moshref Razavi, R. Ahmad, "Information System and its Users as a Single System: A Discussion on its Nature and Level of Granularity", International Conference on Economics and Finance Research, ICEFR 2011, Singapore, 26-28 Feb 2011, To be Published.
[7] A. Moshref Razavi, R. Ahmad, "Motivation and Satisfaction with IS", International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT 2011), World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Penang, 22-24 Feb 2011, To be published.
[8] A. Moshref Razavi, R. Ahmad, "Aligning IS Design with Users- Mind Contents: Recommendations from a Psychodynamic Point of View", International Conference on Economics and Finance Research, ICEFR 2011, Singapore, 26-28 Feb 2011, To be Published.
[9] A. Moshref Razavi, R. Ahmad, "Dealing with Human Issues throughout Systems Implementation: Guidelines from a Psychodynamic Perspective", International Conference on Managemnent Technology and Applications (ICMT 2010), Singapore, 10-12 September, 2010, pp. 96-104. doi:10.3850/978-981-08-6884-0_C020.
[10] A. Kersten, Organizing for powerlessness. "A Critical Perspective on Psychodynamics and Dysfunctionality". Journal of Organizational Change Management. Vol. 14 Issue 5, 2001, pp.452 - 467.
[11] D. Wastell. Learning Dysfunctions in Information Systems Development: Overcoming the Social Defenses with Transitional Objects, MIS Quarterly, 1999, 23(4), pp. 581-600.
[12] Y. Gabriel, and A. Carr. "Organizations, Management and Psychoanalysis: An Overview", J. Managerial Psychology, vol. 17, No. 5, 2002, pp. 348-365.
[13] Y. Gabriel. The Psychoanalysis of Organizations. Sage Publications Ltd, 1999.
[14] L. Lapointe, and S. Revard. "A Multilevel Model of resistance to Information Technology Implementation", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3, September 2005, pp. 461-491.
[15] L. Lapointe, and S. Rivard. "A Triple Take on Information System Implementation". Organization Science, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2007, pp. 89- 107.
[16] L. Markus. "Power, politics, and MIS implementation". Communications of ACM, Vol 26, Issue 6, pp. 430-444, 1983.
[17] E. Davidson, and W. Chismar. "The Interaction of Institutionally Triggered and Technology-Triggered Social Structure Change: An Investigation of Computerized Physician Order Entry". MIS Quarterly, Vol 13, No. 4, pp. 739-758, 2007.
[18] W. Bovey, and A. Hede, "Resistance to organisational change: the role of defence mechanisms", Journal of Managerial Psychology .Vol. 16 Issue 7, 2001, pp.534 - 548.
[19] H. Kim, and A. Kankanhalli. "Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2009.
[20] Ivar Jacobson, Grady Booch, James Rumbaugh, The Unified Software Development Process, Addison-Wesley Professional, February 1999.
[21] P. Sobreperez, E. Ferneley, and F. Wilson, "Tricks or Trompe L'Oeil? An Examination Workplace Resistance in an Information Rich Managerial Environment", Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, Regensburg, Germany. 2005. Paper 41. pp. 484-494.