Effect of the Internet on Social Capital
Internet access is a vital part of the modern world and an important tool in the education of our children. It is present in schools, homes and even shopping malls. Mastering the use of the internet is likely to be an important skill for those entering the job markets of the future. An internet user can be anyone he or she wants to be in an online chat room, or play thrilling and challenging games against other players from all corners of the globe. It seems at present time (or near future) for many people relationships in the real world may be neglected as those in the virtual world increase in importance. Internet is provided a fast mode of transportation caused freedom from family bonds and mixing with different cultures and new communities. This research is an attempt to study effect of Internet on Social capital. For this purpose a survey technique on the sample size amounted 168 students of Payame Noor University of Kermanshah city in country of Iran were considered. Degree of social capital is moderate. With the help of the Multi-variable Regression, variables of Iranian message attractive, Interest to internet with effect of positive and variable Creating a cordial atmosphere with negative effect be significant.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1076482Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1286
 Wellman B., Hasse, A.Q., Witte, J. & Hampton, K. (2002). Capitalizing on the Internet: Network capital, participatory capital and sense of community. In B. - Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (eds.), The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
 Bourdieu, P. (1985). The Forms of Capital. In J.G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook for Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
 Coleman, J. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, Issue Supplement: S95-120.
 Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
 Woolcook, M. (1998). Social Capital and Economic Development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27: 151-208.
 Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital. A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Wacquant, L.J.D. & Wilson, J. (1989). The Cost of Racial and Class Exclusion in the Inner City. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 501: 8-25.
 Weiss, R. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of social and emotional isolation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 Markey, P. M., Wells, S. M., & Markey, C. N. (2002). Social and personality psychology in the culture of cyberspace. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.). Advances in psychology research (Vol. 9). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
 Manasian, D. (2003). Digital dilemmas: a survey of the Internet society. Economist.
 Paper presented at ISTR Fourth International Conference: "The Third Sector: For What and for Whom?" Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, July 5-8. Retrieved Oct 1, 2004from http://www.jhu.edu/~istr/conferences/dublin/workingpapers/siisiainen.p df.
 Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Keisler, S., & Scherlis, W. (2000). Information and communication: alternate uses of the Internet in households. Information Systems Research.
 McKenna, Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
 Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: new ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 Tamaschke, L. (2003). The Role of Social Capital in Regional Innovation: Seeing both the wood and the trees. In Huysman, M., Wenger, E., & V. Vulf (eds.). Proceedings of International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T2003) (pp. 241-264), Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.74 The WELL. http://www.well.org/.
 Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J.C. (1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture (2d. edition). London: Sage Publications.
 Putnam, R.D. (1995a). Bowling Alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6: 65-78. (Online: httlp:muse.jhu.edu./demo/journal_of_democracy/v006/putnam.html).
 Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon Schuster.
 Granovetter, M.S. (1982). The Strength of Weak Ties: A network theory revisited. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (eds.), Social Structure and Network Analysis (pp. 105-130). Berverly Hills, CA: Sage.
 Siisi├ñinen, M. (2000). Two Concepts of Social Capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam.
 Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.
 Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78,1360-1380.
 Baym, N. (1995). The Emergence of Community in Computer Mediated Communication. In S.G. Jones (ed.), Cybersociety. Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 138-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
 Wellman, B. (1997). An Electronic Group is Virtually a Social Network. In S. Kiesler (ed.), The Culture of the Internet. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
 Wellman B., Hasse, A.Q., Witte, J. & Hampton, K. (2002). Capitalizing on the Internet: Network capital, participatory capital and sense of community.
 Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
 Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
 Van Gelder, L. (1991). The Strange Case of the Electronic Lover. In C. Dunlap & Kling (eds.), Computerization and Controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (pp. 364-378). San Diego: Academic Press.
 De Leon, F. (1994). Senior Circuits. Seattle Times, E1, E4. October, 23.
 Brennan, P.F., Moore, S.M. & Smyth, K.A. (1992). Alzheimer's Disease Caregivers' Use of a Computer Network. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 14: 662-73.
 Bock, P. (1994). He's not Disabled in Cyberspace. Seattle Times, Febrary, 24: pp. A1-2.
 Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19: 52- 90.