Computer-aided Sequence Planning of Shearing Operations in Progressive Dies

Authors: Alan C. Lin, Dean K. Sheu

Abstract:

This paper aims to study the methodology of building the knowledge of planning adequate punches in order to complete the task of strip layout for shearing processes, using progressive dies. The proposed methodology uses die design rules and characteristics of different types of punches to classify them into five groups: prior use (the punches must be used first), posterior use (must be used last), compatible use (may be used together), sequential use (certain punches must precede some others) and simultaneous use (must be used together). With these five groups of punches, the searching space of feasible designs will be greatly reduced, and superimposition becomes a more effective method of punch layout. The superimposition scheme will generate many feasible solutions, an evaluation function based on number of stages, moment balancing and strip stability is developed for helping designers to find better solutions.

Keywords: Manufacturing systems, advances in metal forming, computer-aided design, progressive die.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1076362

References:

[1] Korneli Michael, 1999. Designing progressive dies - Reviewing the basics of progressive tooling. Stamping Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, January/February
[2] Lange Kurt, 1991. Handbook of Metal Forming,. NY: McGraw-Hill
[3] Paguin J. R. and Crowley R. E., 1987. Die Design Fundaments, NY: Industrial Press
[4] Wilson F. W. and Harvey P. H., 1963. Die Design Handbook, NY: McGraw-Hill
[5] Schubert P. B., 1967. Die Methods: Design, Fabrication, Maintenance, and Application, NY: Industrial Press
[6] Schaffer G., 1971. Computing design of progressive die. American Machinist, No. 22, pp. 73-75
[7] Nakahara S., Toshio K., Tamura K., Asuke F., Soda C. and Nakamura T., 1978. Computer aided progressive die design. Proceedings of the 19th Machine Tool Design Research Conference, London: McMillan, pp. 171-176
[8] Bergstrom K., Kivivuori S., Osenius S. and Korhonen A., 1988. Computer aided design of progressive die. Chersot In J. L. and Ohate E. (eds.), Modeling of Metal Forming Processes, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 155-162
[9] Choi J. C., Kim B. M. and Kim Chul, 1999. An Automated Progressive Process Planning and Die Design and Working System for Blanking or Piercing and Bending of a Sheet Metal Product. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, No. 15, pp.485-497
[10] Thanapandi C. M.,Walairacht A., and Ohara S., 2001. Genetic Algorithm for bending process in sheet metal industry. IEEE Electrical and Computer Conference, Toronto, Vol. 2, pp.957-962
[11] Tor S. B., Britton G. A. and Zhang W. Y., 2005. Development of an object-oriented blackboard model for stamping process planning in progressive die design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16, pp.499-513
[12] Zhang W. Y., Tor S. B. and Britton G. A., 2004. A Hybrid Intelligent System for Stamping Process Planning in Progressive Die Design. Innovation in Manufacturing Systems and Technology, January 2004, Available from: Http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3905
[accessed 20 Mar 2010]
[13] Ong S. K., DeVin L. J., Nee A. Y. C. and Kals H. J. J., 1997. Fuzzy set theory applied to bend sequencing for sheet metal bending. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, No. 69, pp.29-36.
[14] Lin Z. C. and Chang J. M., 2001. Application of the torque equilibrium method in the study of offset displacement in the upper and lower dies in a shearing-cut progressive die. International Journal of Material Production Technology, No. 16, pp. 528-544.