Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30574
Faculty-Industry R&D Joint Ventures: Barriers VS Incentives for Developing Nations
Abstract:The aspiration of this research article is to target and focus the gains of university-Industry (U-I) collaborations and exploring those hurdles which are the obstacles for attaining these gains. University-Industry collaborations have attained great importance since 1980 in USA due to its application in all fields of life. U-I collaboration is a bilateral process where academia is a proactive member to make such alliances. Universities want to ameliorate their academic-base with the technicalities of technobabbles. U-I collaboration is becoming an essential lane for achieving innovative goals in this century. Many developed nations have set successful examples to prove this phenomenon as a catalyst to reduce costs, efforts and personnel for R&D projects. This study is exploits amplitudes of UI collaboration incentives in the light of success stories of developed countries. Many universities in USA, UK, Canada and various European Countries have been engaged with enterprises for numerous collaborative agreements. A long list of strategic and short term R&D projects has been executed in developed countries to accomplish their intended purposes. Due to the lack of intentions, genuine research and research-oriented environment, the mentioned field could not grow very well in developing countries. During last decade, a new wave of research has induced the institutes of developing countries to promote R&D culture especially in Pakistan. Higher Education Commission (HEC) has initiated many projects and funding supports for universities which have collaborative intentions with industry. Findings show that rapid innovation, overwhelm the technological complexities and articulated intellectual-base are major incentives which steer both partners to establish faculty-industry alliances. Everchanging technologies, concerned about intellectual property, different research environment and culture, research relevancy (Basic or applied), exposure differences and diversity of knowledge (bookish or practical) are main barriers to establish and retain joint ventures. Findings also concluded that, it is dire need to support and enhance cooperation among academia and industry to promote highly coordinated research behaviors. Author has proposed a roadmap for developing countries to promote R&D clusters among faculty and industry to deal the technological challenges and innovation complexities. Based on our research findings, Model for R&D Collaboration for developing countries also have been proposed to promote articulated R&D environment. If developing countries follow this phenomenon, rapid innovations can be achieved with limited R&D budget heads.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1076210Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1562
 Johan Bruneela,b, Pablo D-Esteb, Ammon Salter a ,2010, "Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration", Research Policy 39, 858-868
 von Hippel, E., von Krogh, G., 2003. Open source software and the "Private- Collective" innovation model. Organization Science 14, 208- 223.
 Geuna, A., Steinmeuller, W., Salter, A.J. (Eds.), 2003. Science and Innovation: Changing Rationales for the Public Funding of Research. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
 Rosenberg, N., 2002. America-s University/Industry Interfaces 1945- 2000. Working paper, Department of Economics, Stanford University.
 Yong S. Lee, 2000, "The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment ", Journal of Technology Transfer, 25: 111-133
 Brown, J.S., Duguid, P., 2000. The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
 Bishop, K., D-Este, P., Neely, A., 2011. Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 40, 1, pp. 30-40.
 Hall, B.H., Link, A.N., Scott, J.T., 2003. Universities as research partners. Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 485-491.
 Hertzfeld, H.R., Link, A.N., Vonortas, N.S., 2006. Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy 35, 825-838.
 Gunasekara, A.. 2006, "Reafirming the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems", Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 101-113.
 Abramo, G., D-Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F., 2011,"University- industry research collaboration. A model to assess university capability", Higher Education, 62(2), 163-181.
 Nissani, M. (1997), Ten cheers for interdisciplinary: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. Social Science Journal, 34, 2, 201-216
 Teece, D. (2000), Managing Intellectual Capital, New York: Oxford University Press
 Chesbrough, H. (2003), The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property, California Management Review. 2003. 45 (3): 33- 58.
 Hall, B.H., Link, A.N. and Scott, J.T. (2001), Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 1-2, 87-97.
 Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1, 128-152.
 Van Dierdonck, R. and Debackere, K. (1988), Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian Universities. R&D Management, 18, 4, 341-353.
 USA National Science Board, 2008
 Roberto Fontana, Aldo Geunab, Mireille Matt (2006), Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signaling, Research Policy Vol. 35(2006), Page 309-323
 Hong, W., (2006), Technology transfer in Chinese universities: is ÔÇÿmode 2- sufficient for a developing country? In: New Technologies in Global Societies. World Scientific Publishers, New Jersey, pp.21-50
 Bruhn, J.G. (1995), Beyond discipline: Creating a culture for interdisciplinary research. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science , 30, 4, 331-341.
 Cyert, R.M. and Goodman, P.S. (1997), Creating effective universityindustry alliances: An organizational learning perspective. Organizational Dynamics , 25, 4, 45-57.
 Pavitt, K. (1998), The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy, 27, 8, 793- 805.
 Lopez-Martinez, R.E, Medellin, E., Scanlon, A.P. and Solleiro, J.L. (1994), Motivations and obstacles to university industry cooperation (UIC): A Mexican case. R&D Management, 24,1, 17-31
 Dasgupta, P. and P. David, 1994, Towards a New Economics of Science, Research Policy 23, 487-522.
 Robert W. Gracy (2011), " Enhancing International Research Collaborations: A University Perspective" Asia Pacific Research Executive Forum 2011,Strategic Collaboration to further strengthen Universities in Asia Pacific, June 8th, 2011
 Lindholm Dahlstrand, A. (1999), Technology-based SMEs in the Göteborg region: Their origin and interaction with universities and large firms. Regional Studies, 33, 4, 379-389.
 Behrens, T.R. and Gray, D.O. (2001), Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship of climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy, 30, 2, 179-199.
 Veugelers, R., Cassiman, B., 2005. R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23, 355-379.
 Allen, J.T., 1984. Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. MIT, Press, Cambridge (MA).
 von Hippel, E., 1987. Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading. Research Policy 16, 291-302.
 Durrani, T.S. and Forbes, S.M. (2004) The three-legged stool : new modes of university-industry-government collaboration. In: 13th International Conference on Management of Technology, 2004-04-03 - 2004-04-07, Washington
 Hong, W., (2006), Technology Hippel, E., 1987. Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading. Research Policy 16, 291-302.
 Paul C. Irwin Crookes, 2009,"China-s embrace of the market economy: understanding its innovation strategy", European View 8:133-141
 Freeman, R. E., The Stakeholder Approach Revisited, Zeitschrift f├╝r Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2004, pp. 228-241.