Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30063
Evaluation of Urban Development Proposals An ANP Approach

Authors: T. Gómez-Navarro, M. García-Melón, D. Díaz-Martín, S. Acuna-Dutra,

Abstract:

In this paper a new approach to prioritize urban planning projects in an efficient and reliable way is presented. It is based on environmental pressure indices and multicriteria decision methods. The paper introduces a rigorous method with acceptable complexity of rank ordering urban development proposals according to their environmental pressure. The technique combines the use of Environmental Pressure Indicators, the aggregation of indicators in an Environmental Pressure Index by means of the Analytic Network Process method and interpreting the information obtained from the experts during the decision-making process. The ANP method allows the aggregation of the experts- judgments on each of the indicators into one Environmental Pressure Index. In addition, ANP is based on utility ratio functions which are the most appropriate for the analysis of uncertain data, like experts- estimations. Finally, unlike the other multicriteria techniques, ANP allows the decision problem to be modelled using the relationships among dependent criteria. The method has been applied to the proposal for urban development of La Carlota airport in Caracas (Venezuela). The Venezuelan Government would like to see a recreational project develop on the abandoned area and mean a significant improvement for the capital. There are currently three options on their table which are currently under evaluation. They include a Health Club, a Residential area and a Theme Park. The participating experts coincided in the appreciation that the method proposed in this paper is useful and an improvement from traditional techniques such as environmental impact studies, lifecycle analysis, etc. They find the results obtained coherent, the process seems sufficiently rigorous and precise, and the use of resources is significantly less than in other methods.

Keywords: Environmental pressure indicators, multicriteria decision analysis, analytic network process.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1334776

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF

References:


[1] Cloquell-Ballester, V., Monterde-Diaz R., Cloquell-Ballester V.,Santamarina-Siurana M., Systematic comparative and sensitivity analyses of additive and outranking techniques for supporting impact significance assessments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Volume 27. Issue 1. January 2007. Pages 62-83.
[2] Hasse J. y Lathrop R.. Land Resource Impact Indicators or Urban Sprawl. Rowan University and Collage Farm Road. United State. 2003
[3] Brilly. M. R. Simon y A. Vidmar. Monitoring The Impact of Urbanisation on the Glinscica Stream. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. Parts A/B/C. Volume 31. Issue 17. 2006.
[4] Chace J. y Walsh J.. Effect on Native Avifauna: A Review. Villanova University and University of Washingtonl. United State. 2004
[5] Zhang. Y.. Y. Zhifeng y L. Wei. Analyses of urban ecosystem based on information entropy. Ecological Modelling. Volume 197. Issues 1-2. August 2006
[6] Zhang. Y.. Y. Zhifeng y Y. Xiangyi. Measurement and evaluation of interactions in complex urban ecosystem. Ecological Modelling. Volume 196. Issues 1-2. 10 July 2006
[7] Brown A.L.. Increasing the utility of urban environmental quality information. Landscape and Urban Planning 65 (2003) 85-93
[8] Discoli Carlos A. Urban environmental impact matrices development: assessment indices incorporation Building and Environment 40 (2005) 915-928
[9] Rojas R.I.. Modelos de evaluaci├│n de impacto ambiental en la planeaci├│n urbana . Informaci├│n Tecnol├│gica. Volume 9. Issue 5. 1998. Pages 19-28
[10] Hermann. B.G.; Kroeze. C.; Jawjit. W. Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment. multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators: Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (2007)18. p. 1787 - 1796.
[11] S├│lnes J.. Enviromental Quality Indexing of Large Industrial Development Alternatives using AHP. University of Iceland. 2003
[12] Lundin Margareta and Gregory M. Morrison. A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems. Urban Water. Volume 4. Issue 2. . June 2002. Pages 145-152.
[13] Köne A├ç. B├╝ke T. An Analytical Network Process (ANP) evaluation of alternative fuels for electricity generation in Turkey. Energy Policy 2007; 35; 5220-5228
[14] Bosch Peter. Martin B├╝chele. David Gee. Edith Smeets and Rob Weterings. Technical report No 25. Environmental indicators:Typology and overview. European Environment Agency. ┬®EEA. Copenhagen. 1999
[15] Pinter. L.. Cressman. D.R. & Zahedi. K. (1999). Capacity Building for Integrated Environmental Assessment and Reporting: Training Manual. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) & Ecologistics International Ltd.
[16] Leskinen P. Comparison of alternative scoring techniques when assessing decision maker's multi-objective preferences in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management. 2007 October 85(2):363-70.
[17] Garc├¡a-Mel├│n M., Ferr├¡s-O├▒ate J.. Aznar J.. Aragonés-Beltr├ín P.. Poveda-Bautista R. Farmland appraisal: an Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach. Journal of Global Optimization (in press). DOI 10.1007/s10898-007-9235-0. 2007
[18] Wolfslehner Bernhard. Harald Vacik and Manfred J. Lexer. Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management. Volume 207. Issues 1-2. Decision Support in Multi Purpose Forestry. 7 March 2005. Pages 157-170.
[19] Bojórquez-Tapia Luis A. Sánchez-Colon Salvador. Florez Arturo. Building consensus in environmental impact assessment through multicriteria modeling and sensitivity analysis. Environ Manage 2005;36(3):469-81.
[20] Saaty. Th.. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Planning. Priority Setting. Resource Allocation.. Pittsburgh: RWS Publcations. 1996.
[21] Saaty. Th.. Decision Making with interdependence and feedback. The Analytic Network Process: RWS Publications. Pittsburg 2001
[22] Neaupane K.M. and M. Piantanakulchai. Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation. Engineering Geology. Volume 85. Issues 3-4. . 21 June 2006. Pages 281-294.
[23] Leskinen Pekka and Jyrki Kangas. Multi-criteria natural resource management with preferentially dependent decision criteria. Journal of Environmental Management. Volume 77. Issue 3. November 2005. Pages 244-251.
[24] Belton V. y Stewart T. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis an Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers. United Kingdom. 2002
[25] Barba-Romero. S.. Pomerol. J.Ch. Decisiones Multicriterio. Fundamentos Teóricos y Utilización Práctica. Serv. Public. Universidad de Alcalá de Henares.1997
[26] Ramzan, N., Degenkolbe, S., Werner, W., Evaluating and improving environmental performance of HC's recovery system: A case study of distillation unit, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2007, doi 10.1016/j.cej.2007.09.042
[27] RoyB., Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1996
[28] Brans, J.P,; Vincke, P.; Mareschal, B. (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE Method. Eur. J. Opl. Res. 24, 228 238.
[29] Beccali M., Cellura M., Mistretta M., Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renew Energy 2003; 28:2063-87
[30] Georgopoulou E., Sarafidis Y., Mirasgedis S, Zaimi S, Lalas DP. A multicriteria decision-aid approach in defining national priorities for greenhouse emissions reduction in the energy sector. European Jouranl of Operational Research, 2003, 146, 199-215
[31] Keeney Raiffa Keeney R.L., Raiffa H., Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York, 1976
[32] Cheng EWL. Li H. Analytic network process applied to project selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2005; 131; 459-466.
[33] Wey WM. Wu KY. Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2007; 46; 985-1000.
[34] Erdo─ƒmu┼ƒ ┼×. Aras H. Ko├º E. Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2006; 10; 269-279.
[35] Partovi FY. Corredoira RA. Quality function deployment for the good of soccer. European Journal of Operational Research 2002; 137; 642-656.
[36] Raisinghani. H.S.. Meade. L.. Schkade. L. Strategic e-business decision analysis using Analytic Network Process. IEEE transactions on Engineering Management 2007. 54 (4); 673-686.
[37] Aragonés-Beltr├ín P.. Aznar J.. Ferr├¡s-O├▒ate J.. Garc├¡a-Mel├│n M. Valuation of urban industrial land: an Analytic Network Process approach. European Journal of Operational Research 2008; 185-1; 322- 339
[38] Haktan─▒rlar B. Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey. Energy 2005; 30; 1146-1161.
[39] Niemira MP. Saaty TL. An Analytic Network Process model for financial-crisis forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting 2004; 20; 573-587.
[40] Garc├¡a Mel├│n, M. Aragonés Beltr├ín, P. Gonz├ílez-Cruz, M. An AHPbased evaluation procedure for Innovative Educational Projects: A faceto- face vs. computer-mediated case study, Omega,36, 5, 2008, 754-765