Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30184
Similarity Measure Functions for Strategy-Based Biometrics
Abstract:Functioning of a biometric system in large part depends on the performance of the similarity measure function. Frequently a generalized similarity distance measure function such as Euclidian distance or Mahalanobis distance is applied to the task of matching biometric feature vectors. However, often accuracy of a biometric system can be greatly improved by designing a customized matching algorithm optimized for a particular biometric application. In this paper we propose a tailored similarity measure function for behavioral biometric systems based on the expert knowledge of the feature level data in the domain. We compare performance of a proposed matching algorithm to that of other well known similarity distance functions and demonstrate its superiority with respect to the chosen domain.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1076062Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1277
 M. Badizadegan, Texas Hold'em Flop Types, Goldstar Books, Los Angeles, California, 1999.
 P. M. Baggenstoss, Class-specific classifier: avoiding the curse of dimensionality, Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, Jan 2004, pp. 37- 52.
 C. Barral, J. Coron and D. Naccache, Externalized Fingerprint Matching, Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2004.
 H. Eidenberger, Evaluation and Analysis of Similarity Measures for Content-based Visual Information Retrieval, ACM Multimedia Systems Journal, 2006.
 A. K. Jain, R. Bolle and S. Pankanti, BIOMETRICS: Personal Identification in Networked Society, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
 T. Kinnunen and I. ainen, Class-discriminative weighted distortion measure for VQ-based speaker identification, In Proc. Joint IAPR International Workshop on Statistical Pattern Recognition, Windsor, Canada, August 6-9, 2002, pp. 681-688.
 K. Lee and H. Park, A New Similarity Measure Based on Intraclass Statistics for Biometric Systems, ETRI Journal, Oct. 2003, pp. 401-406.
 H. Lei, S. Palla and V. Govindaraju, ER2: An Intuitive Similarity Measure for On-Line Signature Verification, IWFHR '04: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (IWFHR'04), IEEE Computer Society, 2004, pp. 191--195.
 O. Mut and M. Gökt├╝rk, Improved Weighted Matching for Speaker Recognition, The Third World Enformatika Conference, WEC'05, Istanbul, Turkey, April 27-29, 2005, pp. 229-231.
 M. Neuhaus and H. Bunke, An error-tolerant approximate matching algorithm for attributed planar graphs and its application to fingerprint classification, Proc. Joint IAPR Int. Workshops Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition, 2004, pp. 180 -189.
 Poker-edge.com, Stats and Analysis, Available at: http://www.pokeredge. com/stats.php, Retrieved June 7, 2006.
 A. Schwaighofer, Sorting it out: Machine learning and fingerprints, Telematik, 2002, pp. 18-20.
 A. Sturn, Cluster Analysis for Large Scale Gene Expression Studies, Masters Thesis. The Institute for Genomic Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA, December 20, 2000.
 Wikipedia, Mahalanobis Distance, Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahalanobis_distance, Retrieved August 22, 2006.
 R. V. Yampolskiy, Behavior Based Identification of Network Intruders, 19th Annual CSE Graduate Conference (Grad-Conf2006), Buffalo, NY, February 24, 2006.
 R. V. Yampolskiy and V. Govindaraju, Use of Behavioral Biometrics in Intrusion Detection and Online Gaming, Biometric Technology for Human Identification III. SPIE Defense and Security Symposium, Orlando, Florida, 17-22 April 2006.
 S. Yang and I. Verbauwhede, A Secure Fingerprint Matching Technique, In Proc. ACM Workshop on Biometrics Methods and Applications, 2003, pp. 89-94.