Technology Enhanced Learning: Fostering Cooperative Learning Through the Integration of Online Communication as Part of Teaching and Learning Experience
This paper discusses ways to foster cooperative learning through the integration of online communication technology. While the education experts believe constructivism produces a more positive learning experience, the educators are still facing problems in getting students to participate due to numerous reasons such as shy personality, language and cultural barriers. This paper will look into the factors that lead to lack of participations among students and how technology can be implemented to overcome these issues.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1075551Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1238
 Elby, A (2000) What students' learning of representations tells us about constructivism The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Volume 19, Issue 4, 4th Quarter 2000, pp. 481-502.
 Gillies, R.M. & Boyle, M., (2009) Teachers Reflection on Cooperative Learning : Issues of Implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education.
 Nayir, O.Y, Yildirim, B & Ko┼ƒtur, H.I. (2009), Pre-service teachers- opinions about constructivism. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 1, Issue 1 pp. 848-851.
 Zhu,C., Valcke,M. & Schellens, T. (2009). A cross-cultural study of online collaborative learning. Multicultural Education and Technology Journal. Volume 3, Issue 1.
 Ewens, W. (2003). Teaching Using Discussion. IRC Teaching Resources Guide. http://www.irc.uci.edu/trg/77.html
 Kasim,H & Ali, F (2004) English Communicative Events and Skills Needed At the Workplace : Feedback from the Industry. English for Specific Purposes 2010.
 Chang, M (2004). Why some graduates are more marketable than others? (Powerpoint Slides). http://www.epu.gov.my/seminars
 Tracey, R. (2009), Instructivism, constructivism or connectivism. Training and Development in Australia. Surry Hills: Dec 2009. Vol. 36, Issue. 6; pp. 8.
 Wresch, W., Arbaugh, J.B., & Rebstock, M. (2005) International online management education courses: A study of participation patterns, The Internet and Higher Education, Volume 8, Issue 2, 2nd Quarter; pp.131-144.
 Caspi, A., Chajut, E., Saporta, K. & Beyth-Marom, R. (2006) The influence of personality on social participation in learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp. 129-144.
 Marlina, R (2009), "I don-t talk or I decide not to talk? Is it my culture?"ÔÇöInternational students- experiences of tutorial participation. International Journal of Educational Research, Volume 48, Issue 4, 2009, pp. 235-244.
 Townsend, J.S (1998) Silent voices: What happens to quiet students during classroom discussions? English Journal. Volume 87, Number 2.
 The AFS Intercultural Exchanges website. http://afsweb.afs.org/HongKong.nsf/pages/1about
 Gillette, D. H (2001) Extending traditional classroom boundaries. American Economist. Volume 45, Number 2.
 Eastman, J. K & Swift, C. Enhancing collaborative learning: Discussion boards and chat rooms as project communication tools Business Communication Quarterly Volume 65, Number 3.
 Larry, G (1991) Trends in Education: Enliven Your Teaching Management Accounting Volume 73.
 Wood, M. M (2001) Preventing school failure: A teacher's current conundrum Preventing School Failure. Volume 45, Number 2.
 Jackson, J (2002), Reticence in second language case discussions: anxiety and aspirations, System, Volume 30, Issue 1, March 2002, pp. 65-70.
 Liu, M. (2006) Anxiety in Chinese EFL students at different proficiency levels,System, Volume 34, Issue 3, September 2006, pp. 301-316.
 Fu, D & Townsend, J.S (1998) Quiet Students across Cultures and Contexts. English Education, Volume 31, Number 1.
 Baldwin, G & James, R (1997). Tutoring and Demonstrating A guide for the University of Melbourne - Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/bookpages/chap4.html
 Koh, H (2009). Successful Global Online Group Projects from Online Discussion. Proceedings of 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System.
 Knowlton, D. S & Knowlton, H, M (2001) The context and content of online discussions: Making cyber-discussions viable for the secondary school curriculum American Secondary Education. Volume 29, Number 4.
 Northover, M. (2002), On-line discussion boards - friend or foe. Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Australasian Society for computers in learning in tertiary education, ASCILITE 2002, UNITEC Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand (2002), pp. 477-484.
 Curtin University Internet Base Learning Construction Kit - Computer Mediated Communication (Some students prefer CMC to F2F communication) http://www.curtin.edu.au/home/allen/we3/igm/12010702.html
 Suler, J (2003). Extending the Classroom into Cyberspace The Discussion Board. Psychology of Cyberspace. (Hypertext Book)
 Newton, D & O'Reilly, M. (2002). Interaction online: Above and beyond requirements of assessment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 18 Number 1.
 Ho, S. (2002). Encouraging online participation? In Focusing on the Student. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 5-6 February 2002. Perth: Edith Cowan University.
 Howard, J. R (2002). Do college students participate more in discussion in traditional delivery courses or in interactive telecourses?: A preliminary comparison .The Journal of Higher Education. Volume 73, Number 6.
 Hirschheim, R (2005), The internet-based education bandwagon: look before you leap. Communications of the ACM, v.48 n.7, pp.97-101.
 Berge, Z. L & Collins, M. P (1996). Facilitating Interaction in Computer Mediated Online Courses. http://emoderators.com/moderators/flcc.html
 Berge, Z. L & Collins, M. P (2000). Perceptions of e-moderators about their roles and functions in moderating electronic mailing list. Distance education: An international Journal. Volume 21, Number 1.
 Bowman, L (2001) Interaction In The Online Classroom. Teachers.Net Gazzette. Volume 2 Number 7.