The Influence of Institutional Shareholder Activism as a Corporate Governance Monitoring Mechanism in Malaysia
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
The Influence of Institutional Shareholder Activism as a Corporate Governance Monitoring Mechanism in Malaysia

Authors: Maizatul A. Musa

Abstract:

Not many studies have been undertaken on shareholder activism in emerging economies, including Malaysia. Shareholder activism in emerging economies is on the rise. This paper seeks to comprehend the elements of this activism that are unique to Malaysia, specifically with respect to how the agency problem is controlled through shareholder activism in improving corporate governance practices within target companies. Through shareholder activism, shareholders make contact with a target company to voice their dissatisfaction, suggestions, or recommendations. This paper utilises agency theory to explain institutional shareholder activism. This theory has been extensively used within literature on corporate governance with regards to shareholder activism. The effectiveness of shareholder activism in improving corporate governance will be examined as well. This research provides a further understanding of shareholder activism in emerging economies, such as Malaysia; this research also has the potential to enhance shareholder activism and corporate governance practices in general.

Keywords: Agency Theory, Corporate Governance, Emerging Economies, Institutional Shareholder Activism, Malaysia.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1075334

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 4999

References:


[1] Armour, J. & Cheffins, B. R. 2009. 'The Rise and Fall (?) of Shareholder Activism by Hedge Funds.' SSRN eLibrary.
[2] Stowell, D. P. 2010. 'Shareholder Activism and Impact on Corporations.' An Introduction to Investment Banks, Hedge Funds, and Private Equity: 241-56. San Diego: Academic Press.
[3] Renneboog, L. & Szilagyi, P. G. 2011. 'The role of shareholder proposals in corporate governance.' Journal of Corporate Finance, 17:1, 167-88.
[4] Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. 1976. 'Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.' Journal of Financial Economics, 3:4, 305-60.
[5] Brav, A. & Mathews, R. D. 2011. 'Empty voting and the efficiency of corporate governance.' Journal of Financial Economics, 99:2, 289-307.
[6] Abdul Jalil, A. & Abdul Rahman, R. 2010. 'Institutional investors and earnings management: Malaysian evidence.' Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 8:2, 110-27.
[7] Brav, A., Jiang, W. E. I., Partnoy, F. & Thomas, R. 2008. 'Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance.' The Journal of Finance, 63:4, 1729-75.
[8] Arafat, M. & Dallas, G. 2011. 'Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: Why It Matters to Investors- and What They Can Do About It.' Global Corporate Governance Forum, 1:22.
[9] Gillan, S. L. & Starks, L. T. 1998. 'A Survey of Shareholder Activism: Motivation and Empirical Evidence ' Contemporary Finance Digest, Vol. 2:No. 3, 10-34.
[10] Guay, T., Doh, J. P. & Sinclair, G. 2004. 'Non-governmental Organisations, Shareholder Activism and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications.' Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 52, 125-39.
[11] Gillan, S. L. & Starks, L. T. 2000. 'Corporate governance proposal and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors.' Journal of Financial Economics, 57:1, 275-305.
[12] Hadani, M., Goranova, M. & Khan, R. 2011. 'Institutional investors, shareholder activism, and earnings management.' Journal of Business Research, 64:12, 1352-60.
[13] Fama, E. F. & Jensen, M. C. 1983. 'Separation of Ownership and Control.' Journal of Law and Economics, 26:1, 301-25.
[14] Firth, M. 1979. 'The Profitability of Takeovers and Mergers.' The Economic Journal, 89:354, 316-28.
[15] Gillan, S. L. & Starks, L. T. 2003. 'Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective.' Journal of Applied Finance, 13:4, 4-22.
[16] Pinto, M. 2006. 'The Role of Institutional Investors in the Corporate Governance.' German Working Papers in Law and Economics, Vol. 2006:Paper 1.
[17] Noe, T. 2002. 'Investor activism and financial market structure.' Review of Financial Studies, 1:15, 289-317.
[18] Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. 1986. 'Large shareholders and corporate control.' Journal of Political Economy, 1:52, 227-52.
[19] Gillan, S. L. & Starks, L. T. 2007. 'The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States.' Journal of Corporate Finance, 19:1, 55- 73.
[20] Lee, D. W. & Park, K. S. 2009. 'Does institutional activism increase shareholder wealth? Evidence from spillovers on non-target companies.' Journal of Corporate Finance, 15:1, 488-504.
[21] Bainbridge, S. M. 2008. 'Investor Activism: Reshaping the Playing Field?' SSRN eLibrary.
[22] Bainbridge, S. M. 2000. 'Constraints on Shareholder Activism in the United States and Slovenia.' SSRN eLibrary.
[23] Ruiz-Mallorquí, M. V. & Santana-Martín, D. J. 2011. 'Dominant institutional owners and firm value.' Journal of Banking and Finance, 35:1, 118-29.
[24] Starks, L. 2007. The Influence of Institutional Investors on Financial Markets through Their Trading and Governance Monitoring. FMA Doctoral Seminar.
[25] Singam, K. 2003. 'Corporate Governance in Malaysia.' Bond Law review, 15:1, 314-44.
[26] Claessens, S. & Djankov, S. 1999. 'Who Controls East Asian Corporations?' SSRN eLibrary. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Joseph, F. & Larry, L. 1999. 'The expropriation of minority shareholders: Evidence from East Asia.' Washington, DC. : World Bank.
[27] Abdul Wahab, E. A. & Abdul Rahman, R. 2009. 'Institutional investors and director remuneration: do political connections matter?' Advance in Financial Economics, 13:1, 139-69.
[28] Mohd Ghazalli, N. A. 2007. 'Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: some Malaysian evidence.' Corporate Governance, Vol. 7:No. 3, 251-66.
[29] Satkunasingam, E. & Shanmugam, B. 2006. 'The Consequences of Culture on Shareholder Activism in Malaysia.' Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 4:1, 45-56.
[30] Thilainathan, R. 1999. 'Corporate Governance & Restructuring in Malaysia.' World Bank/ OECD
[31] Abdul Rahman, R. & Mohamed Ali, F. H. 2006. 'Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence.' Managerial Auditing Journal, 21:7, 783-804.
[32] Abdul Wahab, E. A., How, J. & Verhoeven, P. 2008. 'Corporate Governance and Institutional Investors: Evidence From Malaysia.' Asian Academy of Management of Accounting and Finance, 4:2, 64-90.
[33] Ahmad, R., Aliahmed, H. J. & Ab Razak, N. H., Sr. 2008. 'Government Ownership and Performance: An Analysis of Listed Companies in Malaysia.' SSRN eLibrary.
[34] Sulong, Z. & Mat Nor, F. 2008. 'Dividends, Ownership Structure and Board Governance on Firm Value: Empirical Evidence From Malaysian Public Listed Company.' Malaysian Accounting Review, 7:2, 55-94.
[35] Li, D., Moshirian, F., Pham, P. K. & Zein, J. 2004. 'When Financial Institutions are Large Shareholders- The Role of Corporate Governance Environments.' University of New South Wales.
[36] Hashim, H. A. & Devi, S. S. 2007. 'Corporate Governance, Ownership Structure and Earnings Quality: Malaysian Evidence.' In M. Tsamenyi & S. Uddin (Eds.) Research in Accounting in Emergence Economies: 97- 123. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[37] Employees Provident Fund 2010. 'Voting Guidelines.' Kuala Lumpur: Employees Provident Fund.
[38] Retirement Fund Incorporated 2011. 'Annual Report 2011.' Kuala Lumpur: Retirement Fund Incorporated.
[39] Thomas, R. S. 2008. 'The Evolving Role of Institutional Investors in Corporate Governance and Corporate Litigation.' Vanderbilt Law Review, 61:2, 300-13.
[40] Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C. & Schwart, S. H. 2005. 'Culture, Law, and Corporate Governance ' International Review of Law and Economics:25, 229-55.
[41] Admati, A. R., Pfleiderer, P. & Zechner, J. 1994. 'Large Shareholder Activism, Risk Sharing, and Financial Market Equilibrium.' Journal of Political Economy, 102:6, 1097-130