Communicative Competence: Novice versus Professional Engineers' Perceptions

Authors: Ena Bhattacharyya

Abstract:

The notion of communicative competence has been deemed fuzzy in communication studies. This fuzziness has led to tensions among engineers across tenures in interpreting what constitutes communicative competence. The study seeks to investigate novice and professional engineers- understanding of the said notion in terms of two main elements of communicative competence: linguistic and rhetorical competence. Novice engineers are final year engineering students, whilst professional engineers represent engineers who have at least 5 years working experience. Novice and professional engineers were interviewed to gauge their perceptions on linguistic and rhetorical features deemed necessary to enhance communicative competence for the profession. Both groups indicated awareness and differences on the importance of the sub-sets of communicative competence, namely, rhetorical explanatory competence, linguistic oral immediacy competence, technical competence and meta-cognitive competence. Such differences, a possible attribute of the learning theory, inadvertently indicate sublime differences in the way novice and professional engineers perceive communicative competence.

Keywords: Communicative competence, technical oral presentation, linguistic competence, rhetorical competence.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1075308

References:

[1] Jablin, F. M., & Sias, P. M. (2001). The New Handbook of Organizational Competence:Advances in theory, research and methods. In Fredric M. Jablin & Linda L. Putnam (Eds.), Part IV: Communication behavior in organizations - Communicative competence (pp. 1-911). Thousand Oaks, California, : Sage Publications.
[2] Leung, C. (2005). Convivial communication:Recontextualizing communicative competence. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 119-144.
[3] Lailawati Mohd. Salleh. (2007). Communication competence of Malaysian leaders as a function of emotional intelligence and cognitive complexity. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Scripps College of Communication Ohio University, Ohio.
[4] Jung, M. N. (2005). Perceptions of Korean college students and teachers about communication-based English instruction: Evaluation of a college EFL curriculum in South Korea. Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy Degree Doctor of Philosophy, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA. Retrieved from http://etd.ohiolink.edu/view.cgi?acc_num=osu1110161814
[5] Hafizoah Kassim, & Fatimah Ali. (2010). English communicative events and skills needed at the workplace:Feedback from the industry English for Specific Purposes, 29(3), 168-182.
[6] Morton, J. (2012). Communities of practice in higher education:A challenge from the discipline of architecture. Linguistics and Education 23, 100-111.
[7] Rusinaru, D., Popescu, D., & Nistorescu, C. P. (2010). Curricular tools for Professional Communication Skills development of engineering students within University of Craiova. Paper presented at the Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments, 2010 IEEE Dublin.
[8] Bhattacharyya, E., Shahrina Mohd Nordin, & Rohani Salleh. (2009). Internship students' workplace communication skills:Workplace practices and university preparation. Paper presented at the CIEC Conference, Florida, Orlando, USA.
[9] Dannels, D. P., & Norris Martin, K. (2008). Critiquing critiques:A genre analysis of feedback across novice to expert design studios. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, 133-159.
[10] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning:Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Bordieu, P., Chamboredon, J.-C., & Passeron, J.-C. (1991). The Craft of Sociology:Epistemological preliminaries (R. Nice, Trans.). Berlin,Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Co.,
[12] Lailawati Mohd. Salleh. (2008). Communicative Competence:A Malaysian Perspective. Human Communication. A Publication of the Pacific and Asian Communication Association, 11(3), 303-312.
[13] Morton, J. (2009). Genre and disciplinary competence:A case study of contextualisation in an academic speech genre. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 217-229.
[14] Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C.-J., & Cragnolini, V. (2004). Ivory tower to concrete jungle revisited. Journal of Education and Work, 17(1), 47-70.
[15] Figueiredo, A. D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of engineering. Paper presented at the Workshop on Philosophy & Engineering (WPE 2008), Royal Engineering Academy, London.
[16] Venkatesan, P., & Ravenell, R. (2011). What is the most important skill/quality in the engineering workplace?
[The way I see it] Potentials, IEEE Xplore, 30(3), 6-8.
[17] Eisner, S. (2010). Grave new world? Workplace skills for today's college graduates. American Journal of Business Education, 3(9), 1-24.
[18] Tang, S. H., Wong, S. L., Tho, P. Y. S., & Hanafi Atan. (2005). Employers' perceptions and expectations of Malaysian engineering graduates in the workforce. International Journal of Learning, 12(8), 313-318.
[19] Bhattacharyya, E. (2011). Communicative competence in technical oral presentation in engineering education:Stakeholder perceptions in a Malaysian context. Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(8), 1291-1296.
[20] Hovde, M. R. (2005). Preparing students for global engineering workplace communication. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Indiana Sectional Conference DeKalb, IL.
[21] Rowley-Jolivet, E., & Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions:Context,argument and interaction International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45 -70.
[22] Kalaimani, R., & Kaliamoorthy, S. (2007). Using IT to improve the oral and aural performance of Tamil language students by developing metacognitive skills. In Chitra Shegar & Ridzuan Bin Abdul Rahim (Eds.), Redesigning pedagogy:Voices of practitioners (pp. 157). Singapore: Pearson Education South Asia.
[23] Zarefsky, D. (2005). Public speaking:Strategies for success (4th ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
[24] Dannels, D. P., Gaffney, A., & Martin, K. (2008). Beyond content, deeper than delivery:What critique feedback reveals about communication expectations in Design Education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 1-16.
[25] Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited:How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21, 385-395.
[26] Dannels, D. P. (2002). Communication Across the Curriculum and in the Disciplines:Speaking in Engineering. Communication Education, 51(3), 254-268.
[27] Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thoiusand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
[28] Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound. A practical handbook. London: Sage Publications.
[29] Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
[30] Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design:Qualitative,quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
[31] Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Desgining and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. California: SAGE Publications.
[32] Dannels, D. P. (2009). Features of success in engineering design presentations:A call for rhetorical knowledge. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23, 399-427.
[33] Montero-Fleta, B. (2012). Looking Beyond Linguistic Outcomes: Active Learning and Professional Competencies in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1812-1819. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.384.
[34] Andersen, A. (2004). Preparing engineering students to work in a global environment to co-operate, to communicate and to compete. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 549-558. doi: 10.1080/03043790410001711243
[35] Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. Harmondsworth, Middlesex,England: Penguin Books.
[36] Arnó-Macià, E., & Rueda-Ramos, C. (2011). Promoting reflection on science, technology, and society among engineering students through an EAP online learning environment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(1), 19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.12.004
[37] Bernama. (2011). Undergraduates need to enhance soft skills -Khaled, The STAR online. Retrieved from http://my.news.yahoo.com/undergraduates-enhance-soft-skills-khaled- 20110407-091316-668.html